Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael N Q8
So, I downloaded the Timegrapher app to take readings of my BLRO. I honestly think this watch has a bigger problem than the time loss creep issue.
Since I have multiple models and some other brands, I checked all of them, and these readings march up with my observations of their daily performance.
Sea Dweller 4000 gave a rate of -3.3 s/d, amplitude of 283 and a beat error of 0.4 (Dial up)
Daytona (2005) gave a rate of 7.8 s/d, amplitude of 259 and a beat error of 0.1 (Dial up)
Daytona Ceramic (2016) gave a rate of 5.4 s/d, amplitude of 269 and a beat error of 0.3 (Dial up)
Air King (2018) gave a rate of 2.3 s/d, amplitude of 274 and a beat error of 0.9 (Dial up)
Explorer I (2018) gave a rate of 1.8 s/d, amplitude of 259 and a beat error of 0.3 (Dial up)
I recorded the results of the BLRO and the Breitling as they are both “long reserve” movements.
The values from the BLRO appear to indicate a problem, but the bizarre thing is that its keeping time within 2 sec per day while wound and worn. I’m going to leave it for 3 days and will keep checking the readings and monitor the time loss.
|
Michael,
The Brietling data is irrelevant to this poll.
Besides you're measuring in 6 positions. It's no a GS.
Honestly, I wouldn't worry about the GMT.
For all intents and purposes it seems to be running fine on the wrist.
Simply enjoy it and send it in if you notice the timing go off and it's not to your liking.
Don't over analyse it all as you'll only start poisoning your mind
