Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy
He’s disappointed Rob, he has an agenda, ignores contradicting information and embellishes ones that support his theory.
|
A completely unfounded suspicion
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy
The issue that upset me is his bias of the posted information. For example, on mine, I posted the Amplitude readings of my watch in six different positions as taken by a certified Rolex Watchmaker, they showed excellent results in every aspect. He suggested that it was only due to the fact the watch was recently wound.
|
I just re-read all your 30 posts in this thread, these are 4,5% of all replies (674) so far, and ranks you to position 7 in quantity. Only post #111 contained data from your watchmaker. Concerning the amplitude readings, I replied the following in # 113 and you applauded in #122.
Your claim "He suggested that it was only due to the fact the watch was recently wound." is just b......t.
Your conclusion (and an excellent reply):
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheVTCGuy
I was trying to understand all this about amplitude, and beat error, and mainspring force, and molecular alignment.... Then my head exploded  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TswaneNguni
Stay calm ..and just get the pieces together .  |
My conclusion:
-> No agenda, no bias, no theory ... but in favour of measurement data and facts