Quote:
Originally Posted by amanbra
Okay here are my results for the 124270
I full wound it up yesterday morning, waited 24 hrs measured, then full find again waited 15 mins and measured. The waiting 15 mins means that the 300~ amp reduces.
This movement is weird in that 9h position the watch runs fast… matches real world experience where on a recent holiday i rest it crown down over night and it’s running fast…
BE always under 0.2, generally 0.1
My repaired DJ will be available tomorrow.
 |
According to your data.
With your watch, all indications are that you will simply get better results with timekeeping on the wrist(day to day usage) where attitudes are are moving feast and amplitudes are better(if that's actually a requirement with this movement?).
What is the timekeeping like on the wrist for your watches long term?
Is it acceptable?
It doesn't change the fact that we are simply looking for acceptable stability in long term(10 years +) timekeeping out of these watches. Or at least, comparable performance levels to 31xx movements whilst setting power reserve aside.
Otherwise we may as well just buy watches with Seagull movements and save a s**t load of money and heartache
