View Single Post
Old 10 April 2022, 03:31 AM   #2329
Vince_76
"TRF" Member
 
Vince_76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyp View Post
There's definitely an issue, but I don't think your description is quite accurate. It's not as though this is a movement that operates normally, but outside of Rolex/COSC standards. Those operating outside of those standards have a different flaw, causing abnormal wear on some watches. Those not experiencing the flaw run within spec (by and large), while those that are experiencing it are way, way off. It's not as though Rolex simply produced a movement that is outside of spec when operating normally. Somewhat different.
I never claimed that, at the point of production, the movement was outside of COSC specs. In fact, to the contrary, the movement was fine. My movement is still “fine” per the COSC standards but I wouldn’t be surprised if it falls out of specs (and it definitely is trending that way).

My point is this - Rolex knows of this systemic issue, and they haven’t addressed it in a systemic manner. For a luxury company, to keep customers in the dark like this, is pretty disappointing. You know that Rolex knows about this issue. Yet, what have they done on a company-wide basis?
__________________
AP 15500ST (Silver) // ♛ Rolex 126334 (Blue Roman, Fluted, Jubilee) // Ω Moonswatch (Mission to Pluto) // G-Shock GA2100-1A1
Vince_76 is offline   Reply With Quote