Quote:
Originally Posted by saxo3
 Many thanks Charles 
A discussion about technical aspects, e.g., the isochronism described in post 3652, would be by far more interesting for me than all the other stuff like 8.64E4 seconds/day, watches as jewelry, Rolex will fix it, or other nonsensical stuff that we have read again and again in this thread. 2023 is already year 8 after the introduction of the 3235 movement in 2015.
How do you know that your 3235 movements have no problem? You observe good timekeeping? You measured amplitudes and rates? Are you sure you understand this graph?
Thanks for you feedback and interest. |
To be fair I personally have no problem. That doesn’t mean the watch isn’t as perfect as it should be. The reason I say this is because the two 3235 I have keep very accurate with the 3185 I have in the winder with them. And compared to an omega speedmaster gmt (caliber 3603) and a tag (caliber 5), the 3235 keep much more accurate time. The Omega was by far the worst of any watch I’ve ever owned.
I also submit that I may be missing something with the graph, and I don’t have the equipment to test amplitude. At the same time, I submit that nothing will ever be as accurate as a clock that continually updates itself like the clock in my phone.