Quote:
Originally Posted by CharlesN
I don't think I have said owning a Weishi is a "Pity" at all.
I certainly did not want to or attempt to be condescending in any way.
I am trying to be helpful and answer questions honestly and truthfully and using my own opinion based on my personal experience.
|
I already quoted the person who said it was a pity. I won't mention his name because now he's not mentioning my name and that is apparently the way mature people communicate with each other
What you did say, Charles, is that the 1900 produces "much greater information with which a much better understanding of errors can be calculated and seen." Of the 1000 you also said "I found the data I was collecting was nowhere near accurate enough for serious recording of data." I'm calling BS. You and "the other guy" have turned this movement problem into a fetish over data collection. That's great, enjoy your fancy machines. I like cool tools as well. But it's completely disingenuous to suggest that anything beyond integer values are necessary to know if these watches have a problem. That cannot be disputed. This thread would not even exist if the problem at hand were a matter of fractions of a second.