View Single Post
Old 15 September 2023, 09:34 PM   #4443
TheVTCGuy
2025 Pledge Member
 
TheVTCGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Have to agree Paul but some all this checking stuff have taken over the lives, and perhaps taken the enjoyment of owning and wearing a Rolex watch.
We are of the same mindset PADi, but I was remembering some of my college physics and brought up a point about measuring error rate and bias towards failure in the results due to a stricter tolerance, I.E. the +-2 seconds day versus +6-4. Keep in mind this is back in the days of slide rulers, (really was). I think Isocoles was one of my teachers, but Easy E was kind enough to explain some points (way over my head) and said he would test the hypothesis. I am very interested in the results, see if there is anything to that thought process or not. It may be nothing, but then again it MAY explain some of the bad test results the 32 has shown in this thread, so I am looking forward to hearing what he discovers.

Easy E, don’t forget my 62% cut of all the millions we make off of this idea!
__________________
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote