[Maxy]

Originally Posted by ArtNouveau

I’ve had a black 116500 since ‘19. Last spring in Vegas the WOS in Wynn’s had a 126500 black as exhibition. Trying them on and comparing side by side, there’s just not enough difference for me to seek one out.

Thanks for your response.

Originally Posted by Hkspwrsche

Your own opinion may vary so you need to decide for yourself. I have a white 116500 and based on timing, I had the choice of both when both were out. I was leary of the metal ring (from years of speedy service a the dings on the bezel) and if I wanted a zenith with thinner sub dials I would have bought that instead.
I honestly think the black looks better in photos; even my own black dial. I still think the 116500 white is the most legible ceramic stainless Daytona. Try them on back to back and you’ll know for sure. I did.

I would look very carefully at both in person. We blow up these macro photos and comparisons often make them lean toward our own preference but, on the wrist both white dials are very similar with legibility going to the 116 for me. The a-symmetrical case is not unusual for any Rolex. The heavier crown guards on the new version make it look less symmetrical to me.

That I agree that 116's porcelain white dial is the more legible and the 126 white is more matte and not as white as 116. Thanks for your reply as well!