ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Poodlopogus · Today, 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlyinHawaiian

Data for my GMT II 3285 movement.

What's amazing, to me, is how little timekeeping deviation there is for DU positions across time intervals. I knew it would typically be one of the two fastest, but didn't realize it could maintain consistency so much better than others.

I don't have a timegrapher, so I tried a different experiment w/my 3230 (that averages about -3.8/d): Fully wound it and rested it 3U. Will take some measurements and see what happens.

View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok?
Yes, no issues	1,046	69.83%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine	62	4.14%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d)	390	26.03%
Voters: 1498. You may not vote on this poll

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 36 (0 members and 36 guests)