|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
| Yes, no issues |
   
|
1,054 | 69.76% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
  
|
62 | 4.10% |
| No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
  
|
395 | 26.14% |
| Voters: 1511. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
Yesterday, 06:06 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: Rollie
Posts: 786
|
Not sure about Q1, but for Q2 I don't think the 22xx movements utilise the chronergy escapement found in the 32xx movements so that is a positive if you are concerned about the issues reported on the 32xx.
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 25 (2 members and 23 guests) | |
| jamesgames , Kalle_Alemania |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
