The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 April 2024, 08:47 PM   #1
Bemyself
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Singapore
Posts: 10
116655 or 126655? Advice please

Impossible to get it from an AD so going used or grey. 116655 can be purchase 22 k usd and 126655 can be bought at 27k usd. Both are used.
116655 is a 2016 model while the 126655 is a 2021 model.
My questions are:
1. Should I buy the 116655 as it about 5k usd cheaper and I’m ok missing out on the 72 hours and the glidelock
2. Thou 116655 is cheaper but it’s 8 years watch compared to the 126655 which is 3 years. Should i spend 5k more on the 126655 as the watch is still new and under guarantee while the 116655 is already 8 years which I’m worry about the wear and tear.
Your friendly and unbiased comments please. Thanks
Bemyself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2024, 08:53 PM   #2
Easy E
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 4,656
For me, I have more faith in the 11 series movement today. Also, imho, I think a long power reserve is useless if there is a chance the watch runs poorly.

Absolute worst case buy the 11, spend $1000 on a RSC service. You get 2 years warranty and save 4 bones.

Edit. The glidelock is a super nice clasp.
Easy E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2024, 09:09 PM   #3
Bemyself
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Singapore
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy E View Post
For me, I have more faith in the 11 series movement today. Also, imho, I think a long power reserve is useless if there is a chance the watch runs poorly.

Absolute worst case buy the 11, spend $1000 on a RSC service. You get 2 years warranty and save 4 bones.

Edit. The glidelock is a super nice clasp.
Thanks. Great advice! Agree on the glidelock
Bemyself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2024, 03:22 PM   #4
faimag
"TRF" Member
 
faimag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: US, SG, DK, GR
Watch: Reverso
Posts: 3,084
I'd get the one which is in better shape.
faimag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2024, 03:59 PM   #5
tramplejericho
2024 Pledge Member
 
tramplejericho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northants U.K.
Watch: 228239 blue dial
Posts: 268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bemyself View Post
Impossible to get it from an AD so going used or grey. 116655 can be purchase 22 k usd and 126655 can be bought at 27k usd. Both are used.
116655 is a 2016 model while the 126655 is a 2021 model.
My questions are:
1. Should I buy the 116655 as it about 5k usd cheaper and I’m ok missing out on the 72 hours and the glidelock
2. Thou 116655 is cheaper but it’s 8 years watch compared to the 126655 which is 3 years. Should i spend 5k more on the 126655 as the watch is still new and under guarantee while the 116655 is already 8 years which I’m worry about the wear and tear.
Your friendly and unbiased comments please. Thanks

I owned a 126655 and the glide lock was a life saver in warm weather. I know it’s more but it’s a superior watch in pretty much every way movement wise. It’s the one that got away for me, shouldn’t have traded it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
116400GV Milgauss GV Black Dial, 228235 Day Date 40 White Dial, 126655 Yachtmaster Rose 40, 126610LV Submariner
tramplejericho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2024, 05:42 PM   #6
karleone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,226
Impossible to get from AD? This gotta be one of the easiest professional to get from AD. Situation is now much better compared to a a few years ago. You should try several ADs. To reply to your question I would get the one that is in the better condition
karleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2024, 07:10 PM   #7
Bemyself
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Singapore
Posts: 10
Thanks all for the great advices. Sales didn’t go thru as the seller keeps changing her mind. Might go for a 126655.
Bemyself is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2024, 08:44 PM   #8
JSol1
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New England
Posts: 1,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by tramplejericho View Post
I owned a 126655 and the glide lock was a life saver in warm weather. I know it’s more but it’s a superior watch in pretty much every way movement wise. It’s the one that got away for me, shouldn’t have traded it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I agree. I still own the 126655 and for me the mini glidelock is a must for any OF model. I reluctantly passed on a chocolate dial Daytona before it was discontinued because of the clasp.

As others have said, it can be had at the AD relatively easy. It’s my only Rolex that isn’t in demand and I love it.
JSol1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2024, 11:48 PM   #9
StackLexus17
"TRF" Member
 
StackLexus17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Texas
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 578
Get the 126655.
The glide lock alone is worth it.

If you're keeping the watch longer than say +2 years then buy the newer model.

What's $5k extra over a couple of years of wear...??? Nothing.
__________________
♛116500LN
StackLexus17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2024, 11:57 PM   #10
alexCoub
"TRF" Member
 
alexCoub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 10
You are fortunate to have the 126655. It's a beautiful model.
alexCoub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2024, 05:52 AM   #11
Solo118
"TRF" Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,068
I much prefer the 116655. Reliable movement, and a smaller clasp. I am sure glidelock is cool to have, but not at the cost of having a massive clasp! Just my 2 cents, as I have experience with both
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2024, 06:43 AM   #12
Osmin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Germany
Posts: 421
The clasp is not massive. It’s much smaller than Submariner Glidelock.

So 126655 all the way!
Osmin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 June 2024, 05:18 PM   #13
jcdevoe26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Podgorica, MNE
Posts: 267
I currently have a TT YM40 and I am planning to upgrade to the full rose gold 126655. I had a chance a few years ago to compare the 116655 and the 126655 and the mini-glide lock really was completely worth it (I just couldnt afford the 126655 at the time from the AD so I went with the TT).
jcdevoe26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 June 2024, 11:47 PM   #14
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,702
For me, it's all about the fit as opposed to the movement.

Without hesitation, I would spend the money for the glide lock.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2024, 03:05 AM   #15
prnceofpersia23
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
prnceofpersia23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: AZ, USA
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 1,912
Glidelock is awesome.

Go with the 12.
prnceofpersia23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2024, 03:55 AM   #16
Robf52
"TRF" Member
 
Robf52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sunshine State
Watch: lots of Rolex
Posts: 4,821
I have the 11 bought new from my AD in 2019; 7.1" wrist with E/EG OF. The piece has been super, including the fit, so glidelock for me not necessary.
__________________
126610LV//116508 Daytona YG Black/Champagne
116655 YM40 Everose Oysterflex//126622 YM40 Blue//126600 SD43
126710BLNR//126711CHNR
126334 DJ41 Rhodium/Diamonds//126331 DJ41 TT Wimbledon
124300 OP41 Green//126334 DJ41Mint Green
Robf52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2024, 01:53 AM   #17
minetwang
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2024
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 1
Considering budget and longevity, choose based on your priority: save $5k with the 2016 116655, accepting older tech, or invest $5k more in the 2021 126655 for newer features and warranty security.
minetwang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2024, 01:56 AM   #18
gamingdoctor
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Michigan, US
Posts: 263
If you have the opportunity, consider seeing the watches in person or wearing them. The lack of differences may make you consider the older version more heavily; also if it fits well minus the glidelock you may have no need for it!
gamingdoctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2024, 03:24 AM   #19
jwill
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy E View Post
For me, I have more faith in the 11 series movement today. Also, imho, I think a long power reserve is useless if there is a chance the watch runs poorly.

Absolute worst case buy the 11, spend $1000 on a RSC service. You get 2 years warranty and save 4 bones.



Edit. The glidelock is a super nice clasp.


This!!
jwill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2024, 03:27 AM   #20
Robb
2024 Pledge Member
 
Robb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by StackLexus17 View Post
Get the 126655.
The glide lock alone is worth it.

If you're keeping the watch longer than say +2 years then buy the newer model.

What's $5k extra over a couple of years of wear...??? Nothing.

I agree. I have the 126655 and the glidelock is def worth the extra $. Plus, you get the updated movement and longer power reserve
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2024, 04:12 AM   #21
JettyOne
"TRF" Member
 
JettyOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 290
116655 or 126655? Advice please


There is no tangible difference between the two models except glidelock. Does it worth $5k to you?


What’s $5k? a nice 36 Explorer.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JettyOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2024, 04:31 AM   #22
worldofoyster
"TRF" Member
 
worldofoyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vincent
Location: 215
Watch: SS Sub
Posts: 2,058
which one u like better?
worldofoyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2024, 04:09 PM   #23
John Doyle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: US
Posts: 639
I would get the latest at retail only - it can be had pretty easily, so don't go grey!
John Doyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 July 2024, 03:05 PM   #24
cleansocks
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 80
does the old model have easylink?
cleansocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Coronet

Takuya Watches

Asset Appeal

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Tempomat

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.