ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

bigmcmuffins · Yesterday, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saxo3

Thank you. You are the first to present such a set of graphs; great and much appreciated your effort to visualise your data. Graphs are worth a 1000 words.

@saxo3 Thanks for your comments.

I updated the graph now with measurements all the way through 60 hours and the information you requested. Specs are looking alright for me, given what I've seen from the graphs of other watches (amplitude vs time) after 48 hours.

Cheers

saxo3 · Today, 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigmcmuffins

@saxo3 Thanks for your comments.

I updated the graph now with measurements all the way through 60 hours and the information you requested. Specs are looking alright for me, given what I've seen from the graphs of other watches (amplitude vs time) after 48 hours.

Cheers

Well done!

View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok?
Yes, no issues	1,044	69.88%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine	62	4.15%
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d)	388	25.97%
Voters: 1494. You may not vote on this poll

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 31 (0 members and 31 guests)