ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Today, 05:51 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: Texas
Posts: 25
|
I would go with the 5711. I am not a fan of complications in sports watches. Plus, the setting portal on the 5712 cuts the waterproofness to about 80 meters, a big drop from the 120 M on the 5711. I would not take the 5712 in water so what's the point. I would prefer that fine movement in a dress watch.
|
Today, 06:26 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,855
|
I prefer the 5712, but its entirely up to you.
If you want in investment get a low cost S&P ETF, if you don't believe me ask Warren or Charlie (RIP). I was very lucky I sold during the madness for triple what I paid. I suspect this sort of gain won't been seen again
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.