ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
Today, 07:33 AM | #91 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Europe
Watch: Anything
Posts: 2,570
|
Oh my ! . I thought this was done to death years ago ,Xeramic over on vintage Rolex forums did a big write up some years ago pointing out how these are all incorrect . I guess some ppl just want to pretend they have something unique and different .
🙈🙈🙈 |
Today, 09:45 AM | #92 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,281
|
Quote:
Let me just say that you lost me with xer's comment. Are you saying because he said they are fake, incorrect or whatever he called them, that this is fact? I don't care to get involved with this "blueberry" controversy but I do know there are some reputable collectors that believe they are genuine. Only Rolex can solve the mystery of the blueberry insert not speculation by the collecting community or any one individual unless they are privy to inside information from Rolex.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
Today, 04:21 PM | #93 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 2,546
|
Quote:
|
|
Today, 05:40 PM | #94 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,858
|
For the sake of balance I have spoken to some "reputable collectors", dealers and London auction houses who are less than convinced with their authenticity...........so the debate is far from clear. For the record I am not a believer
Quote:
__________________
1680 1675 16800 16570 16710 17000 16613 17013 Gone but not forgotten 16610LV 1016 16234 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests) | |
Mcsmitty |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.