ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues | 1,056 | 69.70% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine | 62 | 4.09% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) | 397 | 26.20% | |
Voters: 1515. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Yesterday, 05:43 AM | #5401 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,907
|
|
Today, 09:02 AM | #5402 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,531
|
Quote:
These movements have been around 10 years. If a company with the expertise and resources of Rolex can't come up with a permanent fix all these years later, the movement is just a dud. I've been saying variations of the following for a while. Rolex will eventually introduce a 33xx that will hopefully work out all these issues. They may come up with some way to service/regulate the 32xx watches that come in so that they run as long as possible without encountering the amplitude issue (maybe by sacrificing accuracy outside their 2s standard) as a "fix", and Rolex and everyone will move on. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (1 members and 4 guests) | |
the dark knight |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.