![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 126710BLRO
Posts: 698
|
Pam 111 for 233?
Hey, looking for some input from members. I currently have a pam 111, J serial, so sandwich dial. I have had my eye on a 233 for several years, but have always talked myself out of it because of redundancy. I know they are overall different watches, cases, complication, etc., but the 233 almost feels like a more "complete" or "upgraded" version of a base luminor marina, and I am concerned that once I get the 233, I may not want to wear my 111.
So, would you keep the 111 and add a 233, or sell 111 and put some cash towards a 233? I can't tell whether I would miss the 111 if I had a 233 or not. I guess ultimately I can add a 233 and see if I need both, but has anyone gone through something similar? Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,632
|
Keep both, variety is the spice of life :) I have 2 Luminars, but one is a PVD case vs the SS on the 111.
__________________
116610LV / Flat Bluesy 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170 / PAM360 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 5,103
|
My 233 has essentially made the other Panerai in my collection obsolete. They get much less wrist time. 372, 416, 390, 380, 250. Part of the issue is the Rolex side of the collection.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Chi-town
Watch: Starbucks, Panerai
Posts: 1,214
|
I would put the cash towards the 233. They will be too similar imo. I’ve had both. If you want a second Pam, maybe add a rad or submersible
__________________
Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 126710BLRO
Posts: 698
|
Thanks for the feedback everyone. I think maybe I'll add for now, and then sell if I feel I am not wearing the 111 anymore. Probably the safest bet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 34,242
|
Add the 233 and see how you feel.
Personally, the 233 would do it for me and I'd sell the 111. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,359
|
Quote:
This is a good call. Suspect you’ll love the 233 and that’ll be that, but worst case scenario, room for both in the collection! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,754
|
I would definitely keep the beautiful 111! The 233 has the GMT function which I don't like while 111 is a timeless classic (Bettarini 44 , dial sandwich).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,922
|
Quote:
![]() Later down the line, prob sell the 111 and get a radiomir to complement. Something like a 45mm pam183, if size matters.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (1 members and 2 guests) | |
crazycarlitos |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.