![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: Platona
Posts: 1,569
|
Patek or Audemars?? Decisions...decisions!!
First, let me start by saying, this is NOT a "which watch is better" post. Obviously, the "best" is very subjective and very personalized to ones taste. Instead, I am just curious as to which piece you would purchase if you were to chose between only these two watches.
The first is the classic Patek Phillipe Calatrava. This is no doubt a classic and an icon. Unbelievable craftsmanship and a piece that will certainly be passed down from generations to generations. The second choice is equally impressive. This is the Audemars Piguet Royal Oak in Rose Gold. This piece is unmistakable and is pure luxury. The fit and finish on the AP is near perfect and the presence on the wrist is second to none. This is equally an heirloom that will be passed from generation to generation in a family. So, which would you chose? Both have approximately the same price tag and each offer the same features (3 hands and a date function). There is no question that each is as near perfection as you could ever expect, but I am curious as to which one YOU would chose if it were your decision. Thanks in advance for taking the time to read and respond! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: --
Posts: 2,097
|
I would take the AP, it's a hard choice yes, but it all just comes down to personal taste. The Calatrava is timeless however, while the design of the Royal Oak may become dated. (who knows?) So that's something to think about.
Also, I just LOVE the decoration of the rotor on the AP. (if you haven't seen it, take a look it's beautiful) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Jim
Location: Dallas
Watch: Love them all
Posts: 225
|
I own an RO chrono and love the watch, but I'd have to give the nod to Patek for timelessness. (And I love those dauphine hands.) Also, I think Patek maintains a classier mystique as a brand by not cranking out giant ugly special editions like you find in the Royal Oak Offshore line.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Paul
Location: UK, Dorset
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,636
|
Patek for me, totaly timeless (no punn intended)
the Calatrava and Aquanaut are on my grail list, will have to wait for my kids to be fully grown up and gone before any moves. My youngest is 2 years old ![]() ![]()
__________________
Rolex Sub 1680, Rolex GMT 116710LN, Rolex Datejust 16220 Salmon Dial (the Mrs), Tudor BB58, Tudor Pelagos Blue and Several Seiko's ************************************************** ***************** "last one in the chopper is a rotten egg" Jonathan Quayle Higgins III |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
AP with leather is awesome, Patek is a little too small.
I'd get AP RO chrono, or AP Safari ROO BTW, there is another choice, VC. They have the Overseas (very similar to AP, some models even share the JLC movement), and then the patrimony line, slightly less expensive than Patek, but bigger at 40mm diameter case |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
Patek.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
|
Patek for me too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
AP for me!
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 161
|
Between those particular two, I'd go with the AP. I like many Pateks, but not that particular piece. Either way, two watches from two of the best manufacturers. You can't go wrong!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Texas
Watch: 216570 & 116660
Posts: 587
|
Patek
__________________
"The probability of anyone watching you do something is in direct proportion to the stupidity of what you are doing" - Warren Miller |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,774
|
Not the Patek I would pick...
When I think Patek I need some form of complication... Perhaps at least annual calendar. That Patek is strictly dress while the RO is a little more flexible. Really comes down to what you want and like. I think you forgot a big piece of the puzzle that being what you do, what you wear daily (is the watch going to be a daily watch?) all these and more play into my decision.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Phillip
Location: Alabama
Watch: Triple 6 SD
Posts: 1,720
|
Patek for me.
![]()
__________________
It is only with the heart that one can see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye. - Antoine de Saint Exupéry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,748
|
I would get a patek but not that particular model. If it is between those exact models I would go with the AP. Honestly you can't go wrong though these are two of the finest brands on earth.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
This is a very tough decision. I am a huge AP lover as you can see on my signature and do own the AP in gold. Go with the Patek unless you already have one.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Ken
Location: Illinois
Watch: Too many
Posts: 2,870
|
Depends on what "wearing habits" you're in, IMO. The Calatrava is an elegant, classy dress watch. If you do a lot of suit and tie action, it's perfect. The AP, while still very classy, is of a stlye that offers more flexibility. I think it can be worn in a wider variety of situations.
I have an AP ROO and a couple of PP's, so I like to rotate them around depending on what I'm wearing. If I had to choose between only having one, I'd go with the AP for versatility. My 2 c's. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
I love, love, love the AP, but the Patek is a decision you will never, ever regret. The Patek is not a watch - it is a statement, an experience, an heirloom, a.... a WIS's timepiece. Since you're asking us to choose, I'm guessing both are not an option. Buy the most exquisite example of horological artistry ever made; buy the Patek.
![]()
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() John |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,251
|
I would chose the Patek. If had the opportunity I would get an anual calendar however.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Elliott
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,145
|
Between the two I'd go with the AP but Patek complicated watches are something worth owning for generations to come. Either or, congratulations on being in such a fortunate position to be choosing between the two
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: JT
Location: in a house....:)
Watch: Hmmm......?
Posts: 1,776
|
AP for me..........good luck
__________________
WISHLIST: Too many to list...... ![]() ![]() ![]() Member #23367 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,815
|
I would hold off on either of those two and wait till I could step into a higher line of Patek--like a 5146 or even a higher AP -like a RG Dual time. As for those two models-neither work for me.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1
|
Nothing beats a Patek. The sleek and class style will never fade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: John
Location: MS & LA
Watch: Rolex Day-Date II
Posts: 1,084
|
Between those two, I'd go with the Patek!
![]()
__________________
- John >>> Rolex & Porsche Owner/Enthusiast <<< |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: Sub/Date SS 16610
Posts: 56
|
It's an unusual comparison. Why not look at a Patek Nautilus? It has the same designer as the RO. The 5711 comes in rose and yellow gold. I have the 5711/1a (steel) and just love it. The dial is amazing - pictures simply don't do it justice. Good luck.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
If it's dress wear you're looking for, nothing beats that stunning looking Patek.
JJ ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: UK
Watch: Chronomaster
Posts: 107
|
Patek for me.
__________________
Thank you and goodnight - much love! Watches: GMT-IIc, Citizen Chronomaster Friend of The Vintage Watch Specialist |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Illusive Man
Location: NYC
Watch: Omega Worldtimer
Posts: 638
|
If you are looking for dressy the Patek, a little more sport the AP. Tho I do prefer the AP, I would go AP.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,812
|
I was never big fan of AP RO chronographs, just too bulky for my taste, but recently I tried exactly the same model like the one on your pic, and it`s probably best looking watch that I ever tried!
Anyway, although I`m hardcore Pathek admirer, and I find that model very beautiful, my vote goes for AP stunner! ![]() ![]()
__________________
My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Gianmaria
Location: ny
Posts: 156
|
15300 rose gold is one of my favorite watch... AP 100%
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
Ap
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.