![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Puerto Rico
Watch: 1968 5513 Sub
Posts: 450
|
Please advise: swap 114060 for 14060?
I’m considering a straight swap of my 114060 late model 2019 Sub for a 14060? Both are in excellent condition. I stand to lose maybe 1k in the deal from the price I paid a year ago for the 114060. Why do it? I have a 1996 Datejust that I’d like to pair to a Sub of the same era. Logic and reason tells me the 114060 is the better watch (ceramic bezel, better bracelet, newer movement etc) but my mind keeps wondering. Thoughts appreciated.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,762
|
Unless you really, really, really have to have and are a huge fan of the 14060. Personally I would not trade the 114060 for it.
In fact, having a modern and a neo vintage is something I enjoy. Some days 5 digit, some days 6.
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex. Ian Fleming |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 24,964
|
Quote:
+1 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
|
I would keep it as having 2 watches from 2 eras. As you grow your collection, you can add other models along the way.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,675
|
If you have not tried it on. Do so first. If you have, then you should have your answer.
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: California/France
Posts: 326
|
Quote:
I always preferred the 5 digits in pictures, side by side with the ceramic, it always looked better to me. That was until I was able to try both and actually see them side by side, and I much preferred the ceramic, by a mile. I still can’t explain why. I’m not saying that will be your case, just don’t buy anything without looking at the real thing first. Good luck. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Coast
Watch: 16610
Posts: 4,933
|
No thanks on the giant lungs and the ceramic is not better, actually more likely to fail in any real distress and the bracelet not stronger as it’s held by the same pins. You will have a more balanced, more classically looking watch that is less blingy, go for it. Rolex changed the lugs back for a reason, to correct a mistake.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: East
Watch: ...
Posts: 1,171
|
I wouldn't do that trade. If your sole reason was down to aesthetics then you might have a case. Also, you got the 114060 quite recently so losing cash on a sub would be another no no.
__________________
Yacht-Master 126622, GMT-Master II 16710, Submariner 114060, Sea-Dweller 16600, Panerai Luminor PAM111 Lange Saxonia Moon Phase 384.029, Tudor Black Bay Harrods M79230G. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 6,957
|
I had the 114060. I now have the 124060. Best of both worlds, closer to the 5 digit subs with the modern upgrades.
__________________
126710 BLNR Jubilee |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,160
|
I have both and love both. But considering you started out with the ceramic sub, you may feel the 5 digit is cheaply built.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Bursa
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 493
|
I would do the trade with an excellent condition + full set 14060M
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,960
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Nash
Location: Europe
Watch: Rolex Only
Posts: 1,532
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: here AND there...
Posts: 2,240
|
the fat boy zero six zero is about as perfect a piece, even with the super case... dont do it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Richard
Location: USA
Watch: me set the time
Posts: 2,520
|
Do it. It's a hobby, might as well make it interesting. You can always trade back to 114060 or buy a 124060 down the road.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,234
|
Fortunate to have both.
It’s your decision. I’m sure you know that both have pros and cons. But a 14060M is my weekly wearer. They are very different watches.
__________________
E |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
|
I tried both on and overwhelmingly preferred the 114060. I love the super case and the ceramic bezel. I know some feel the very opposite though, but I'd keep the 114060.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,167
|
Sorry, can't advise.. Too tough to choose.. I have both of those and my favorite is the one I'm wearing at the time.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 967
|
In a split second. Much nicer proportions, dial, classic look. I predict at some point 5 digit models will be sought after and coveted and people will ask about the modern hunks of chunk: what were they thinking? It’s going to be like 1950s guitars and “improved” versions from the 70s. Just my 2c and I know that other people will call me crazy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 1,017
|
Personally I wouldn't do it.
Aesthetically the 14060 is more pleasing for me; but then the 114060 has all the upgrades.
__________________
Two-Factor Authentication Enabled |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Hans Wildorf
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
I am one of those rare people that enjoys a more messy dial than a minimal one. I like the 4 lines of text on the 114060.
I would keep the 114060 and save up to purchase the 14060 later on if you find you still want it. I would prefer to collect new, neo-vintage, and vintage. There's no rush, take your time. Tons of 14060 available at Tropical Watches (Jacek) or HQ Milton. You are always in time to find one, but you will never get back your 114060.
__________________
♛ Rolex Daytona 16520 Black dial ♛ Rolex Explorer 14270 Swiss only |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,361
|
Please advise: swap 114060 for 14060?
14060 with a tritium dial!
Another option (funds permitting) is to add the 14060 and see how you like it vs your current ceramic model. If you decide you want to part with it, you probably could sell it for the same amount (or slightly less or perhaps slightly more) Here is mine: ![]() I have a bunch of modern models as well |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
Please advise: swap 114060 for 14060?
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,911
|
I have had a 114060 and moved on from it for a 14060m. In my opinion the massive glidelock clasp and fatter lugs just didn’t do it for me with the 114060. Love the 5 digit.
![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,340
|
I wouldn’t
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Jay
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: 326934
Posts: 2,297
|
Both winners but I wouldn't do the trade.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Florida
Watch: Sub, DJ41, GMT
Posts: 7,706
|
I’d never do that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Juho
Location: Finland
Watch: Submariner 16610
Posts: 1,905
|
I'd definitely trade. 5-digit case is SO much better looking. It's just a taste thing though.
__________________
My Luxury Watch Reviews Blog |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Location: USA
Watch: DD40, hulk, Dayton
Posts: 2,039
|
I’d trade for the 124060. Has the body of the 5 digits and the upgrades of the 6 digit. I don’t put much stock in having my 2 rolexes from the same era.
Having a semi vintage and a newer Rolex is a better combination imo. Best of both worlds. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,312
|
Wouldn't do it personally - prefer the newer watch with the modern upgrades.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.