The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Watch Gallery

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 November 2007, 09:07 AM   #1
dwaine99
"TRF" Member
 
dwaine99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dwaine
Location: SC
Watch: 124060
Posts: 357
GMT and Toys

dwaine99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2007, 01:38 PM   #2
flumazenil
"TRF" Member
 
flumazenil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Texas
Watch: Tog TT GMT TT SD4K
Posts: 600
Is that a silencer?
flumazenil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2007, 08:42 PM   #3
dwaine99
"TRF" Member
 
dwaine99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dwaine
Location: SC
Watch: 124060
Posts: 357
100% legal and registered with ATF... most don't realize that private ownership is allowed in the following states: AL, AR, AK, AZ, CO, CT, FL, GA, ID, IN, KY, LA, ME, MD, MS, MT, NE, NV, NH, NM, NC, OH, OK, OR, PA, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, and WY
dwaine99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 01:24 AM   #4
GrandDaddy
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaine99 View Post
100% legal and registered with ATF... most don't realize that private ownership is allowed in the following states: AL, AR, AK, AZ, CO, CT, FL, GA, ID, IN, KY, LA, ME, MD, MS, MT, NE, NV, NH, NM, NC, OH, OK, OR, PA, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, and WY
Yup, you can own one in Washington State, but you cannot legally use it, not even at the range. So what's the point of owning it if you can't use it?
GrandDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 03:04 AM   #5
dwaine99
"TRF" Member
 
dwaine99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dwaine
Location: SC
Watch: 124060
Posts: 357
Va is "supressor" friendly..... can even transport thru other "friendly" states....machine gun friendly too.... only problem is a nice one cost as much as GOLD Rolex...
dwaine99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 03:46 AM   #6
GrandDaddy
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwaine99 View Post
Va is "supressor" friendly..... can even transport thru other "friendly" states....machine gun friendly too.... only problem is a nice one cost as much as GOLD Rolex...
I would rather own a full-auto rifle than a suppresor. I had the pleasure of firing full auto (M4 and several versions of MP5) during one of my overseas vacations. It was a kick in the pants. And yes, there was a supressed glock there too. The trigger reset was actually louder than the actual bang.
GrandDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2007, 09:57 PM   #7
Robb
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Robb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
Great pic!
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 11:46 AM   #8
gha
"TRF" Member
 
gha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: gha
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex DateJust
Posts: 664
Just wondering, why would it be recommended that you carry it that way? (Hammer back/safety on?)
I admit, I know squat about guns. Just a question...don't shoot....gha
gha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 12:24 PM   #9
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by gha View Post
Just wondering, why would it be recommended that you carry it that way? (Hammer back/safety on?)
I admit, I know squat about guns. Just a question...don't shoot....gha
To simply answer your question, it's called condition "one". It's the prefered method of carry for the professional.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 12:47 PM   #10
GrandDaddy
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 576
Cocked and locked, ready to rock. Just strange that you have a supressor in the picture and neither pistol has a threaded barrel. Just showin' off, maybe?
GrandDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 December 2007, 07:03 AM   #11
jbrockiii
"TRF" Member
 
jbrockiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Madison, MS
Posts: 22
Can't think of a better combo, fine watches and fine guns.
jbrockiii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2007, 03:06 AM   #12
JBat
"TRF" Member
 
JBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Washington
Watch: 16710, 16610, DJ
Posts: 7,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by gha View Post
Just wondering, why would it be recommended that you carry it that way? (Hammer back/safety on?)
I admit, I know squat about guns. Just a question...don't shoot....gha
Short answer, because it's not a double action pistol, just like most 1911 style autos. It's single action (the hammer has to be pulled back for the weapon to fire). In a stress situation, the last thing you want to be doing is messing around with cocking the hammer when your life is on the line. Cocked, it's just release the safety and fire away. Condition one like a previous poster said, and really the only way you want to carry a pistol used for self defense.

Otherwise, what's the point?
JBat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 01:02 PM   #13
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
I was a US Army MP. I was trained on the 1911 and carried one every shift for 4 years less some time in MPI when I carried a concealed .38.

At every duty station I was at we were not allowed to have a round in the chamber or the hammer cocked back. We had to have the weapon on safe. Hammer down. Therefore if I needed to fire my weapon (which of course would be under stress and duress) I needed to take the weapon off of safe, chamber a round, hope the grip safety worked properly and fire the weapon.

Baaaaah.

Love the Glock 17 I carry now. Point and shoot.

Having said that, I am really offended by all this gun talk and actual pictures of weapons here.






























Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 01:05 PM   #14
Rawhyde
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Craig
Location: NW Georgia
Watch: Blue Sub+Tud Chron
Posts: 834
I got a new FN FiveSeven a couple of weeks ago. My camera is pretty lousy or I'd post a pic. I passed up a Colt civilian version National Match made in the 1950's about 20 years ago and have regretted it ever since. (At least I was smart enough to pick up a Colt Woodsman Match Target that day....)

Rawhyde
Rawhyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 01:14 PM   #15
dwaine99
"TRF" Member
 
dwaine99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dwaine
Location: SC
Watch: 124060
Posts: 357
I have one of the first 1000 G17's imported into the US... I'd post a pic but it might offend someone.........hehehehehe I trust the Glocks more than any other handgun...... but since I offended KansaiVet, I'm seriously thinking of selling all my handguns, my wife's datejust 18kt/ss, my GMT-II for a $100.00 and buying his and hers Casios.............hehehehe
dwaine99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 02:32 PM   #16
Mike734
"TRF" Member
 
Mike734's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Near Seattle
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
To simply answer your question, it's called condition "one". It's the prefered method of carry for the professional.
LEO weapons around here don't have external safety's of that nature. No cop would carry his .45 in that state. The risk of accidental discharge is too great.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandDaddy View Post
Wow, that's scary. You would think that since you are an LEO you would have an idea on the manual of arms for most (if not all) handguns. What if your only weapon of opportunity is a 1911 (BTW, it's called a 1911, not a .45), would you be S.O.L. then? Think about it.
I was being a little humble. I know how to use the weapon but have not qualified on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KansaiVet View Post
I was a US Army MP. I was trained on the 1911 and carried one every shift for 4 years less some time in MPI when I carried a concealed .38.

At every duty station I was at we were not allowed to have a round in the chamber or the hammer cocked back. We had to have the weapon on safe. Hammer down.
He too should not have the hammer cocked nor should he have a round in the chamber unless he is about to shoot or unless his SOP's require it.


Sorry if I started something here that sidetracked the thread. I just get offended by people who LOVE guns a little too much. They are a necessary evil IMHO.
__________________
Be Brief
Be Brilliant
Be Gone
Mike734 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 02:42 PM   #17
fear
"TRF" Member
 
fear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mililani, Oahu
Posts: 1,307
Guns are bad! Why do some Rolex fans glorify an evil object?












































Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC04542.jpg (83.5 KB, 285 views)
fear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2007, 08:47 AM   #18
jasonbellevue
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Jason
Location: at home
Posts: 5,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by fear View Post
Guns are bad! Why do some Rolex fans glorify an evil object?


__________________
jasonbellevue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 02:45 PM   #19
Gaijin
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Gaijin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
I actually don't really like guns and hate having to go to the range every three months and having to qualify. All that means to me is that I am going to have to clean my weapon afterwards. Hate cleaning my weapon.

I have never understood my co-workers who love to go shoot even on thier days off.

As far as the 1911 .45, it is carried that way in most police departments. The 1911 has a grip safety that allows it to be carried safely with a round in the chamber and the normal safety off. The Army just had strick post SOP which prohibited that. I am guessing that since 9-11 those policies have changed.

The action reaction principle dictates that if I need to use deadly force and I have to jack a round and take my weapon off of safe I am probably dead already. That and not training to do it under stress and getting some serious muscle memory skills is going to diminish your survivability in a close quarter gun fight or with a crazed person up close armed with an edged weapon. Not having a round in the chamber and having your weapon on safe for an on duty urban police officer is sheer madness.
Gaijin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 02:54 PM   #20
fear
"TRF" Member
 
fear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mililani, Oahu
Posts: 1,307
[QUOTE=KansaiVet;356369Hate cleaning my weapon.

Ain't that the truth!!! I hate cleaning guns!!
fear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2007, 02:09 AM   #21
Rawhyde
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Craig
Location: NW Georgia
Watch: Blue Sub+Tud Chron
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by KansaiVet View Post

I have never understood my co-workers who love to go shoot even on thier days off.
Shooting is a fantastic hobby/sport to some of us. With all due respect, have you ever tried any shooting other than "qualification" type shooting?

Have you tried shooting oyster crackers off a bosrd with a .22 target pistol at 50 feet? That's fun, but none too easy.... Ever tried blasting a 2 liter cola bottle filled with water at 75-100 yards with a .44 Magnum? Want something that'll really get you hooked? Try Sporting Clays! Skeet and trap are almost as entertaining also.

For some reason, enforcement types are fascinated with shooting at sillouette targets at 7 yards, 9 mm, .40, and .45 auto pistols. Best group I can generally get out of one of those things is 4-6" at 25 yards, whereas a fine magnum revolver or target pistol can do a ragged hole at the same range.

Get an accurate gun and select some reactive target (such as bottles of water or a box of clay targets) and get on a range that is safe for "plinking", then place your targets at a range that they test the limits of man and machine. 5 clays at 50 yards are great. You start on the left, I start on the right, and whoever breaks the one in the center first "wins"!

SSD and I shot recreationally all through college like this. When he decided to go into enforcement, his new buddies were ribbing him on his first trip to a "real range". They even had the gall to poke fun at his Colt Python! I think he shot a 97 his first time and he thought the whole process was a joke!

The whole point of this rambling post is to convince you to try some shooting where the only "rules" relate to safe gun handling. You might be plesantly surprised at how much fun it can be to shoot for fun. If you're ever in the Chattanooga area, I'd be glad to arrange a demonstration!

Rawhyde
Rawhyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2007, 08:45 AM   #22
jasonbellevue
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Jason
Location: at home
Posts: 5,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by KansaiVet View Post
Hate cleaning my weapon.
I don't. I love cleaning my guns (i'm an avid 1911 fan as well) as much as I love cleaning my watches.
__________________
jasonbellevue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 03:13 PM   #23
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike734 View Post
LEO weapons around here don't have external safety's of that nature. No cop would carry his .45 in that state. The risk of accidental discharge is too great.


Mike,

Not to start one of those "here we go again" threads, but The condition one 1911 is in fact the prefered sidearm of many law enforcement agencies.

The SWAT team I served on for one, not to mention the U.S. Marshall SOG teams and the FBI HRT teams. I trained with both and can surely state both those agencies are in fact issued that weapon.
Over the years it's been my honor to train many of these guys.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 03:23 PM   #24
dwaine99
"TRF" Member
 
dwaine99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dwaine
Location: SC
Watch: 124060
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
Mike,

Not to start one of those "here we go again" threads, but The condition one 1911 is in fact the prefered sidearm of many law enforcement agencies.

The SWAT team I served on for one, not to mention the U.S. Marshall SOG teams and the FBI HRT teams. I trained with both and can surely state both those agencies are in fact issued that weapon.
Over the years it's been my honor to train many of these guys.
You are correct... I know this is true because I have been in the their gear locker many times.....One more pic of my favorite carry gun... the G36......I will not speak of these evil things again.......hehehe

dwaine99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2007, 12:29 AM   #25
GrandDaddy
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike734 View Post
LEO weapons around here don't have external safety's of that nature. No cop would carry his .45 in that state.
Wrong again! I am from Washington, just like you. I know 1911 are authorized for Tacoma PD. Keep trying!
GrandDaddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2007, 04:36 AM   #26
Mike734
"TRF" Member
 
Mike734's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Near Seattle
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrandDaddy View Post
Wrong again! I am from Washington, just like you. I know 1911 are authorized for Tacoma PD. Keep trying!
Seattle PD do not walk around with the hammer back. Seattle PD weapons do not have external safety's. That's all I'm saying. But, I am not a local PD, so I'm not an expert.

My only point was that if I was going to take a photo of my weapon it would not be loaded with the hammer back. The 1911 can be made safer if you lower the hammer.

Local SOP's differ. Tacoma may be different.
__________________
Be Brief
Be Brilliant
Be Gone
Mike734 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 January 2008, 02:05 AM   #27
cbsmohai
"TRF" Member
 
cbsmohai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Travis
Location: Central Texas
Watch: Sub Date 16610
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike734 View Post
LEO weapons around here don't have external safety's of that nature. No cop would carry his .45 in that state. The risk of accidental discharge is too great.



I was being a little humble. I know how to use the weapon but have not qualified on it.



He too should not have the hammer cocked nor should he have a round in the chamber unless he is about to shoot or unless his SOP's require it.


Sorry if I started something here that sidetracked the thread. I just get offended by people who LOVE guns a little too much. They are a necessary evil IMHO.
Being an advocate of the 1911, and the way it was designed, I'll have to interject. It was designed to be a combat sidearm. My grandfather carried his trusty Colt cocked and locked for over 50 years. I keep my nearby my bed also "ready to rock"

I can safely say that with a grip safety, a 1911 with a round chambered and the hammer back is as safe as a loaded Glock or revolver.

Now as far as cops and accidental discharge is concerned, I've seen and heard quite a few Glock stories. It's amazing how many will draw their sidearm with their finger already inside the trigger guard.

If you have a gun on you, or nearby you, there is no reason why a bullet shouldn't be in the chamber. No matter WHAT type of pistol/revolver.
cbsmohai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 09:13 PM   #28
blackgt3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Austra
Posts: 1
I love this GMT & Toys Stuff

I love these piccys of watches and guns so heres mine, im not much of a photographer though.....but what the heck.

Just picked up my new Daytona today, so......more to come.

This is my first post but I have been stalking around for the past few months
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMGP03401.jpg (53.5 KB, 242 views)
blackgt3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2007, 10:52 PM   #29
Andad
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,411
I prefer a black dial with a black grip.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 November 2007, 07:28 AM   #30
Automatic Art
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Derek
Location: Smyrna, GA
Watch: Solar G-Shock
Posts: 35
Dude I love it! I'm a GMT and HK and pistol fan too. TT GMTc, HK 45 and USP .45.
Automatic Art is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.