ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 February 2024, 12:22 PM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,653
|
Modern 321 Movement
Forgive my ignorance, but does Omega use modern lubricants and oils in the modern 321 movements (e.g., EW 321)?
Know someone who has a safe queen EW 321 that has been in a bank safe. Wondering if that could pose an issue with the 321 movement, given Watch has been sitting idle. |
20 February 2024, 08:30 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,653
|
Bump. Anyone know?
|
20 February 2024, 08:34 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Croatia
Posts: 512
|
I would be surprised if they didn't, I'm confident you're safe with it in a safe
Sent from my SM-A415F using Tapatalk |
20 February 2024, 10:12 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,653
|
|
8 March 2024, 04:07 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,521
|
|
10 March 2024, 04:57 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,141
|
|
14 March 2024, 05:37 AM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: New York City
Posts: 608
|
No answer on the lubricants, but for watches I wear rarely, I still wind them fully & run the chrono/spin through the date wheel/etc. every few months or so just to keep things moving.
__________________
“Own time or time will own you.” —Brian Norgard |
22 March 2024, 10:27 PM | #8 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,521
|
Quote:
I had an exchange with “Archer” over on the Omega forums About this topic and the 321 specially. What he said to me is “wind it when you wear it” Archer is an Omega watchmaker, and highly regarded from what I gather |
|
23 March 2024, 01:08 AM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,473
|
Everybody uses modern lubricants. Specs for lube at key points is about viscosity and its ability to stay where put, not if it is modern or not. Modern isn't really a characteristic of lubricants.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
23 March 2024, 11:23 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,653
|
Sadly, no!
Thanks for the clarification! The concern is idle watches not being good for the movement. Sounds like ok for the watch and just worse for the owner - wear and enjoy ‘em! |
26 March 2024, 05:10 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: London, UK
Posts: 11
|
A few days ago I asked an Omega watchmaker this question, his reply was that modern lubricants are used in the Ed White.
|
1 April 2024, 03:21 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,141
|
Might anyone know how they handle ‘everyday exposure’ to magnetism? It is obviously far more susceptible than a modern day Omega Master Chronometer movement that is (largely) impervious to everyday magnetic fields, but can someone wear it without undue concerns? I would assume the answer is yes as the movement (and others like it) were used for decades before the newfangled silicon this and non-magnetic that came along, but I still want to ask. I travel a lot and I’ve found myself wearing every watch apart from my 321 for flights.
Thank you. |
1 April 2024, 04:52 PM | #13 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,444
|
Quote:
__________________
E |
|
1 April 2024, 07:58 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Tony
Location: Global
Watch: All of them.
Posts: 1,141
|
Yes, it did.
As I wrote, I am fully cognizant that such movements (by Omega and other manufactures) served for decades. The reasons behind my question are: 1. Considering how long an issue with a 321 would take to resolve, I have probably babied it more than any other watch I have; 2. while magnetism is not a big issue, I would rather not use my demagnetizer on that particular watch, and 3. I have other timepieces that I am significantly more comfortable flying with. With that said, if another owner of a 321 has experience traveling with a modern EW, I would highly appreciate any helpful views. Thanks, |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.