ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
14 November 2024, 09:30 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Advice on 16660 condition
I am looking for a 16660 and this one has come on my radar. I know the dial has some issues around the date window.
I’m not very familiar with the SD’s but the crown guards look really thick to me (almost too thick). Model number stamp the 6’s look to be stamped higher than the 1 and the 0. I notice the caseback engraving is very worn down, I don’t know how the hell that happens. Are these concerns? Are there any other issues I am not noticing? Watch is priced at $7,500 and will be worn the same as I wear my 16613lb (daily through any task) so a perfect condition watch is not in the running. I appreciate all help and advice!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 November 2024, 09:31 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 November 2024, 10:51 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,617
|
Ask for a photo of the movement. The moisture likely came up through the date window and caused that damage. Regardless, the dial is everything and holds most of the value in my opinion. I personally wouldn’t go for it.
|
14 November 2024, 11:29 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,423
|
This. It looks like moisture damage. I think you can do better although maybe not for that price. I'd personally spend a little more for a watch in better condition.
|
14 November 2024, 11:35 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: VA
Watch: SD43
Posts: 545
|
|
14 November 2024, 03:49 PM | #6 | ||
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks y’all. These are harder to come by than I thought. Especially with an undamaged dial. I haven’t even contacted the seller yet to see if it’s been serviced or not. If movement is working and not damaged is it really worth passing on and paying 2-3k more for a better watch that I’m going to put through hell? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
||
14 November 2024, 04:11 PM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,339
|
I could live with the scratches and beat up lugs but that date window would drive me crazy at any price.
|
14 November 2024, 06:15 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,728
|
For me its ruined, even for this price I would not buy it
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
15 November 2024, 08:06 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,475
|
Exactly
__________________
Rolex Oyster Perpetual Date 115200 Submariner 14060M Sea-Dweller 16600T Submariner Date 116610LN Panerai Luminor 176 |
14 November 2024, 09:24 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Joseph
Location: USA
Posts: 2,621
|
Better examples for that model. I would pass based on condition and overall look. I would say a little more than 1 k you would get a great example of a SD. Good luck with your hunt!
|
14 November 2024, 11:40 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,867
|
The date window is a red flag in my view. Who knows whats going on behind that clear moisture damage? The fact it got to that date window location surely means other hidden issues below and behind within the movement.
Hard pass for me unfortunately.
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41 |
15 November 2024, 12:16 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hillside
Posts: 363
|
16660 is not rare, dial condition is everything, pass and find a better example
|
15 November 2024, 01:41 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2024
Location: Zurich
Posts: 3
|
I would pass, you can find 16660 in better condition
|
15 November 2024, 01:51 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Seth
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 16610
Posts: 281
|
Epitome of the Rolex tool watch
__________________
In Pace Paratus |
15 November 2024, 02:26 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Real Name: G
Location: Illinois
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,599
|
I have more bracelet stretch on newer watches. If the bracelet is original, it wasn't worn a lot considering the age. In this condition, it may not have been serviced since new. With concerns about moisture showing on the dial and service history I would question whether the movement is in good order.
Even at the low end of the value range (and it will be a daily beater), I would pass on this watch with the information you have. |
15 November 2024, 09:38 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Sector 001
Posts: 593
|
Op, I would pass on it, unless you are getting a very sweet deal, the dial condition is concerning as others have mentioned it looks like moisture damage. I would have the movement checked for water damage.
The overall condition is not bad for its age. Like all watches condition is everything. That is a great reference very under the radar. Cheers, |
15 November 2024, 09:44 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oakland
Watch: 1665 Great White
Posts: 152
|
No disagreements with what has been said but this is how I like my cases. Eventually this will surpass others in value. But the dial is an issue. Are we sure that is moisture damage? We often see paint loss around structures, i.e. indices, so maybe that edge just isn't holding paint well after sun . . .
|
15 November 2024, 02:21 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jeff
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,478
|
Water ruined that dial and who knows what else. Pass at that price.
|
Yesterday, 11:41 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Alright, I heard you all and have expanded my search. What about this one? $9650.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Today, 12:21 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Ice House
Watch: Ingersoll Mickey
Posts: 3,339
|
Less questionable.
|
Today, 04:08 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,617
|
Do they mention anything about the case being refinished in the ad? The bezel insert shows a lot of age, while the case looks pristine, which makes me think it might have been professionally refinished.
|
Today, 04:40 AM | #22 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Advice on 16660 condition
Quote:
Second watch has been polished and appears to have a service crystal. Listed by a reputable seller. As long as it’s not over polished I’m not phased by polishing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Today, 06:26 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Underground
Posts: 2,617
|
Just to clarify, when I say refinished, I mean laser welded and recut. It’s a bit different from a polished case. It’s not a bad thing, but I wanted to point it out as it does affect the value.
|
Today, 06:31 AM | #24 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Quote:
Jacek states it is “recently polished” not recut or laser welded. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Today, 05:11 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,663
|
Advice on 16660 condition
To me the price looks low and there a reason for that. Case loos like it’s been done a couple of times, lugs aren’t crisp and then it’s been battered again. Bezel insert looks new. There are better examples out there for not much more imo.
Second one looks much better but not brilliantly done refinishing on flanks. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Today, 05:11 AM | #26 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Quote:
Are you talking about the first or second example? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Today, 05:13 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,663
|
|
Today, 05:17 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,663
|
Tbh i would bite the bullet and get the 116600- bit more money but a better bet long term I’d say. A lot of the 5 digits are pretty beat up now. People were wearing them not putting them in the safe!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Today, 05:52 AM | #29 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Real Name: Goat
Location: Southwest Florida
Watch: 16613
Posts: 5,354
|
Advice on 16660 condition
Quote:
I don’t like the 6 digit models. 5 digits are my sweet spot. A watch that’s been worn and has some character to it is much more appealing to me than a pristine example. Especially because my watches aren’t safe queens. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.