The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 September 2013, 10:49 PM   #1
3sheets86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 563
5513 wg

On my recent quest for my first vintage I have come across a nice 5513 WG full set. The case is crisp with nice sharp edges and it has Rolex service history from 2010. The asking price is £4,750.
Now, I realise that these aren't the most sought after of the 5513's but it happens to be a birth year one for me, it is from a reputable dealer too so I am confident that it is as good as it looks.
I want to start collecting and I know that these aren't strictly classed as vintage, if it wasn't from my birth year I don't think I'd be as tempted. I'm hoping to buy a wearable classic that will hold its value reasonably well should the roof get blown off my house or some other disaster.
Can I go wrong with this or if I really want vintage should I wait and pay more for a plexi matt dial sports model? Dilemma's.........
3sheets86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 10:50 PM   #2
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,297
Wg 5513?
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 10:55 PM   #3
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,962
Clearly you mean WG surrounds and if that is the case I personally would wait and get a plexi w/ matte dial!! Cheers,
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 11:00 PM   #4
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,519
As Ken says a matt dial non-WG surrounds would be preferable, but if the watch sings to you and is the right price then I would get it if that is what you want.

You will pay more, but you should get a 'better' piece.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 September 2013, 11:31 PM   #5
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3sheets86 View Post
On my recent quest for my first vintage I have come across a nice 5513 WG full set. The case is crisp with nice sharp edges and it has Rolex service history from 2010. The asking price is £4,750.
Now, I realise that these aren't the most sought after of the 5513's but it happens to be a birth year one for me, it is from a reputable dealer too so I am confident that it is as good as it looks.
I want to start collecting and I know that these aren't strictly classed as vintage, if it wasn't from my birth year I don't think I'd be as tempted. I'm hoping to buy a wearable classic that will hold its value reasonably well should the roof get blown off my house or some other disaster.
Can I go wrong with this or if I really want vintage should I wait and pay more for a plexi matt dial sports model? Dilemma's.........

I happen to be a big fan of the "unloved"...
The 16660, the 16800, the 5513's with the WG surounds...

The vintage die-hard guy (on average) is not draw to these pieces as they feel that they are not vintage...

The "Modern" watch guy isn't interested in these either as they are not really "Modern" watches any longer...

But I think they are great...And can be had, for the most part, for a reasonable sum of money...

If you find the right example, and like it, I would buy it...

Now, that being said...If what you really want is a Matt Dial 5513, then I would wait and buy that...

If you buy what you don't really love, then 99 times out of 100, you end up selling it in the end...

No question!!!
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2013, 12:11 AM   #6
3sheets86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 563
It was really because it was super clean, complete and most of all from my birth year. I suppose I ought to be grateful that I'm too young to buy a true vintage birth year! haha
3sheets86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 September 2013, 12:27 AM   #7
Clay
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3sheets86 View Post
It was really because it was super clean, complete and most of all from my birth year. I suppose I ought to be grateful that I'm too young to buy a true vintage birth year! haha
Hey...I don't think they had watches when I was born...

As I said, if you like it, buy it...If you buy "Smart" you can always resell and get your money back...
But if it's not what you "Really" want, you will end up selling it in the end...
Clay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.