The pinnacle of Rolex

[pearson1995]

I’ve often wondered, what Rolex is the one which is as good as it gets. I would presume it has to be PM. Sub/GMT/Daytona and DD are probably the likely contenders. Platinum over gold? If so that would be the platinum Daytona vs the DD. I would say I don’t like diamonds on a man’s watch (general rule of thumb). Is the Daytona / DD platinum the best it gets for Rolex in your opinion?

[Calatrava r]

They are all made the same in the same factories out of the same materials. So, the answer lies in the one you like best.

[Mystro]

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

They are all made the same in the same factories out of the same materials. So, the answer lies in the one you like best.

^^^This is the answer.

[thesharkfactor]

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

They are all made the same in the same factories out of the same materials. So, the answer lies in the one you like best.

Perfect answer.

[travisb]

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

They are all made the same in the same factories out of the same materials. So, the answer lies in the one you like best.

[Afratello03]

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

They are all made the same in the same factories out of the same materials. So, the answer lies in the one you like best.

Exactly! It all depends on you to make a choice that befits your life style.

[PenDelicate]

Yup.

[Oyster Al]

Modern tech integrated with a direct visual from the past, what could possibly beat the Le Mans as pinnacle?or at least in the conversation.

[brandrea]

Beauty in the eye of the beholder. One could argue that any which one is the pinnacle.

For me, it’s probably the Submariner.

[garyk]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Beauty in the eye of the beholder. One could argue that any which one is the pinnacle.

For me, it’s probably the Submariner.

I agree!!

[Kenny G]

Originally Posted by Calatrava r

They are all made the same in the same factories out of the same materials. So, the answer lies in the one you like best.

Originally Posted by brandrea

Beauty in the eye of the beholder. One could argue that any which one is the pinnacle.

Fully agree. It’s completely subjective.

The platinum DD is certainly a beaut though…

[dolceman81]

Originally Posted by pearson1995

I’ve often wondered, what Rolex is the one which is as good as it gets. I would presume it has to be PM. Sub/GMT/Daytona and DD are probably the likely contenders. Platinum over gold? If so that would be the platinum Daytona vs the DD. I would say I don’t like diamonds on a man’s watch (general rule of thumb). Is the Daytona / DD platinum the best it gets for Rolex in your opinion?

IMHO a DD platinum quadrant dial!

[1William]

Maybe. PM take a pick.

[Kevin of Larchmont]

Every one of my Rolexes has been the pinnacle until the next one.

[LuxLemon]

Ah the holy grail? That is up to you - until you buy it - and think of a new grail.

[Robf52]

Originally Posted by LuxLemon

Ah the holy grail? That is up to you - until you buy it - and think of a new grail.

This.

[Sephiroth]

Probably Daytona and SkyD from a movement perspective.

[Yobber76]

I agree with everyone, it's in the eye of the beholder. And for me, every time I get one that I think is the ONE, before too long there's another. Right now it's GMTs.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by pearson1995

I’ve often wondered, what Rolex is the one which is as good as it gets. I would presume it has to be PM. Sub/GMT/Daytona and DD are probably the likely contenders. Platinum over gold? If so that would be the platinum Daytona vs the DD. I would say I don’t like diamonds on a man’s watch (general rule of thumb). Is the Daytona / DD platinum the best it gets for Rolex in your opinion?

Myself not a fan of any of the Daytona range especially any precious metal ones but what's best in any Rolex is what that person wants to own and wear. Irrespective perceived price hype etc.

[fozzyf18]

Like Brian said, it is a personal choice. I too shunned diamonds on a man's watch, but the platinum DD with ice blue dial and diamond hour markers would definitely be the exception for me. Love the roman numerals, never thought I would like the diamonds, but I can't refute that pics of that dial really looks good. On the other hand, I am not a fan of diamond bezels.

Other than that, a gold Sub- 126618LB to be exact.

[nyc2la]

To each his/her own for defining the pinnacle Rolex.

This is my choice.

Although I love my SS sports Rolex as well.

There’s room in the Watchbox for it all, not just the “pinnacle”.

[fozzyf18]

Originally Posted by nyc2la

To each his/her own for defining the pinnacle Rolex.

This is my choice.

Although I love my SS sports Rolex as well.

There’s room in the Watchbox for it all, not just the “pinnacle”.

That's it. That's the one that I spoke of. She is a beaut Clarke!

[0nly5iv3Digits]

More or less any model from the 5 digit era

[ROlesorusLEX]

Originally Posted by 0nly5iv3Digits

More or less any model from the 5 digit era

Bingo.

For me, it's the 16600 Sea Dweller. Beautiful lines. A bit thicker and prouder on the wrist, but not too dissimilar from a Submariner. Not jewelry like a 6 digit. Capable. Indestructible. Subtle. Economic.

Will look good in 50 years.

Sent from my CPH2583 using Tapatalk

[dmash]

Originally Posted by ROlesorusLEX

Bingo.

For me, it's the 16600 Sea Dweller. Beautiful lines. A bit thicker and prouder on the wrist, but not too dissimilar from a Submariner. Not jewelry like a 6 digit. Capable. Indestructible. Subtle. Economic.

Will look good in 50 years.

Sent from my CPH2583 using Tapatalk

Agree

And it’s exactly why I just bought a NOS one. It’s pinnacle Rolex tool watch, hands down (imo).

5 digit and before has a soul, 6 digit is kind of lifeless jewelry. Although many models look good, they just don’t sing to me like the older ones do. Feel sterile in all honesty.

[ROlesorusLEX]

Originally Posted by dmash

Agree

And it’s exactly why I just bought a NOS one. It’s pinnacle Rolex tool watch, hands down (imo).

5 digit and before has a soul, 6 digit is kind of lifeless jewelry. Although many models look good, they just don’t sing to me like the older ones do. Feel sterile in all honesty.

I have owned and sold every 6 digit I've ever bought and replaced it with a 5, except for my first watch, a 6 digit DJ36. It goes nowhere. But I did buy an NOS 5 digit 1993 DJ a few months ago as well.

I saw your incoming on the NOS 16600. Congratulations. I bought a V serial NOS 16600 about 3 years ago myself.

I love it when people don't wear their Rolexes for the next guy. . .

Sent from my CPH2583 using Tapatalk

[dmash]

Originally Posted by ROlesorusLEX

I have owned and sold every 6 digit I've ever bought and replaced it with a 5, except for my first watch, a 6 digit DJ36. It goes nowhere. But I did buy an NOS 5 digit 1993 DJ a few months ago as well.

I saw your incoming on the NOS 16600. Congratulations. I bought a V serial NOS 16600 about 3 years ago myself.

I love it when people don't wear their Rolexes for the next guy. . .

Sent from my CPH2583 using Tapatalk

Haha v series SD brothers, nice!

But yeah man, the 6 series, I enjoy them and they’re nice pieces. But the only way to describe it to me is as I did, most of it feels like lifeless jewelry, evokes no real emotion to me. It’s why I overhauled my entire arsenal with stuff that sings to me more. My 136660 JC Deepsea is an exception with its feats of engineering to go so deep, the nice transition blue dial, it’s something special. But yeah a run of the mill GMT, Sub? 5 series and prior for the win, 100%

Maybe I’m just an extreme weirdo though

[Old Geezer]

Originally Posted by pearson1995

I’ve often wondered, what Rolex is the one which is as good as it gets. I would presume it has to be PM. Sub/GMT/Daytona and DD are probably the likely contenders. Platinum over gold? If so that would be the platinum Daytona vs the DD. I would say I don’t like diamonds on a man’s watch (general rule of thumb). Is the Daytona / DD platinum the best it gets for Rolex in your opinion?

Everything in the Rolex public catalog is varying degrees of greatness. The off catalog pieces are next level.

[yowlie]

For me it became the 1665. It was a true feat of engineering . . .

[Barada7]

Explorer 214270 MkII, 39 mm. Great movement, comfortable, easy to read. It’s the pinnacle of Rolex engineering.