ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 August 2015, 05:49 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Tony
Location: london
Watch: Datejust 11
Posts: 356
|
Speedmaster watch buy advise.
Forum members.
I am looking to add a Speedmaster to my collection, and would welcome any advise on Omega watches. At the moment i own a Rolex DJ11 2tone, which i love. Love the look of the Speedmaster, and am torn between the "Professional Moon Watch" and the "Racing Chronometer" in red dial with rubber strap. Both are within my price range. The Racing comes in a lovely red dial colour, to which i would love, and as i have only a small wrist 40mm would be ok. Any advise or knowledge on these two watches would be most gratefull. Many thanks.. |
27 August 2015, 12:10 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,834
|
There is only one moon watch....
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
27 August 2015, 04:08 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: David
Location: New England
Posts: 1,888
|
I'd say the classic one and only moonwatch. One of my favorite watches by far.
|
27 August 2015, 05:04 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
SpeedmasterProfessional with Hesalite.....the one and only.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
27 August 2015, 12:19 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
|
|
27 August 2015, 02:11 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
|
|
27 August 2015, 06:57 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Tony
Location: london
Watch: Datejust 11
Posts: 356
|
Many thanks members for your advise.
I know what you mean about the "moon watch" being a class act. Been studying this watch online and seems that there is a number of different types, and sizes. Can anyone furnish me with the watch code, if possible please. One more question, what is "hasalite"?. Many thanks gang,as i am new to watch collecting.. Thanks for your help... |
27 August 2015, 05:06 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Boston North
Watch: Meteorite Daytona
Posts: 1,467
|
I have to agree here. I love colored dials and interesting watches... but the Speedy Pro moon with plastic crystal is such a classic.
__________________
Pepsi GMT/SD43/DSSD Blue/ DJ41 TT Rose Diamond Dial/ Daytona Meteorite/ SS Sky Dweller White Dial/ IWC Bronze Big Pilot/ Aquanautic Super King / Omega Ploprof 1200 / Graham Scarab Diver |
27 August 2015, 08:49 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Rod
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: YG DD 18238
Posts: 1,540
|
Go with the Speedy Pro. If not it will be the one you'll look back at and think, "I really should have."
Besides, it's the freaking watch Pete Conrad, Alan Shepard, John Young and Gene Cernan wore on the Moon!
__________________
I ask you to judge me by the enemies I have made. -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
27 August 2015, 11:11 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Superleggera
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: Guy
Posts: 129
|
Stay with the classics Tony. 42mm is also great on a smaller wrist. Good luck.
|
27 August 2015, 12:02 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,837
|
Yep I have to agree. I have a very sweet mark II and still want the original...
Plus there is something soothing about the manual wind that is lost with the automatics. |
27 August 2015, 09:41 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Hestalite or plexiglass for the crystal instead of sapphire
There is only one true Speedmaster
__________________
Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
27 August 2015, 11:04 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Steven
Location: Miami Beach
Watch: 214270 &Speedy Pro
Posts: 391
|
My 42 mm Speedy Pro measures almost identically to my 40 mm Sub C No Date. Not sure why they claim the Speedy is 42 mm. Both fit very well on my 6.5 inch wrist. My vote is Speedy Pro.
|
28 August 2015, 08:54 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Tony
Location: london
Watch: Datejust 11
Posts: 356
|
Many thanks gang for your input and knowledge.
Will do some more research before i pull the trigger.. |
7 September 2015, 04:09 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
~~~Hi Steven! the 2mm difference between the Submariner and the Speedmaster is dial size...the Speedmaster's dial is 2mm larger in diameter. The Sub *may* appear to be just as wide, when you include the O.D. of the bezel too, but when measuring actual dial diamters, the Sub's is 2mm less FWIW, I bought a 3570.50 (Man on the Moon) just about a year ago. Lovely watch, no doubt, then May of this year I purchased an 114060. For a couple of reasons, the Speedmaster does not get any wrist time, but not because it isn't a good/handsome/awesome/etc. watch In a lot of ways, the Speedmaster, for me, is a better watch than the 114060. For one, the dial on the 3570.50 is a lot easier to read (tell time), but that might just be my aging eyes...but I doubt it as the Speedmaster's dial is bigger (by 2mm anyways=:-), but it's also a cleaner more efficient dial design IMO, and not because of the four lines on the 114060 Something else I've had a hard time with, wearing the Speedie Pro since acquiring the Subc, and that's the lack of a true second hand. Now before I catch some chit from other members here about this last statement, and I realize this is a problem I have with the Speedmaster, and I may very well be the only one with a Speedmaster that feels this way, the way I see it, and the way I've worn my Speedie Pro, I don't let the hand of the chronometer run, unless I'm timing something, and at the risk of getting off tangent with this particular thought, it 's something I think about and that's the fact that the Speedie Pro, being a chronometer, at least this particular mechanical version, is really two movements in one, with the chrono function piggy backed onto the main movement, if I may so refer to it that way... Still following my train of thought? What I'm trying to say is two things. For one, and this is strictly my hang up with it, I can't seem to let the chrono function just run and run, unless I'm using it to time a particular event, and maybe that timing event is to see 10 seconds go by to time the flush on my HX espresso machine when I want to pull a shot Also, and I'm one of those (since acquiring the Subc) that constantly refers to time.is, just to see how my watch (114060) is keeping time. With the Speedmaster verifying actual time, you're checking the time of two different movements, if one were to check/verify the time, since there are two separate individual movements, if you're looking to see how the seconds and minutes of this Omega, stack up against the atomic time clock Whew!, glad I got that off my chest And just to be clear, I'll reiterate, this dilemma is strictly one I've talked my OCD self into |
|
8 September 2015, 03:39 AM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northwest
Posts: 1,366
|
Quote:
- The 3570.50 does have a true seconds hand... it's in the 9 o'clock subdial, runs all the time the watch is wound, just like the Daytona's subdial at 6 o'clock. The larger seconds hand is for timing seconds when using the chronograph function. - The 3570.50 is a chronograph, not a chronometer, although it can be adjusted to within chronometer (COSC) standards. - It is not a modular chronograph, rather it is an integrated chronograph designed as a chronograph from ground up. It is one of the true classic chronographs and I find it to be one of the most comfortable and legible watches made. The ceramic Sub is very nice as well, just a different type of watch...both very enjoyable to wear. |
|
8 September 2015, 07:19 PM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
~~~all good points you made here toolr yes, you can set the second hand that runs with the minute/hour hands using the teeny dial at 9 o'clock I get crossed eyed trying to see, and you can stop that second hand from running by turning the crown (while pulled out) counter clockwise, but the problem I have, and I realize I'm in the minority here, which is fine with me...the second hand of the chronograph is not synched w/the hour/minute hands...again, most that own and wear this watch, don't have the aversion that I do with these two separate functions (chronograph hand running continuously), and you're right, I misspoke when I called the Speedmaster a chronometer once in my original reply in this thread, it's not a chronometer it's a chronograph! Good point Also, good choice of words when you said the Speedmaster was one of the most legible watches ever made, or words to that effect. It's that stellar dial legibility I prefer over my Submariner, despite the fact I enjoy wearing my Submariner over the Speedmaster. Who knows?, maybe one day I'll fall back in love with my Speedie Pro again and actually wear it I've day dreamed more than thrice, to put together a trade ad (member to member) on the forum here, seeing if someone wanted to trade a watch for it...but haven't been able to bring myself to doing just that. Sorry, but I digress |
|
9 September 2015, 11:57 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Watch: Many...
Posts: 427
|
Quote:
|
|
8 September 2015, 07:12 PM | #19 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,413
|
Quote:
__________________
E |
|
8 September 2015, 07:21 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
|
7 September 2015, 02:18 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,224
|
Get the original Moonwatch.
|
7 September 2015, 04:21 PM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
~~~I have a possible answer to your situation...buy this Hirsch Robby strap and stick it on a Speedmaster, problem solved http://www.hirschstraps.com/collecti...ed-09120940504 |
|
7 September 2015, 04:23 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Chill out. It's one movement.
Your cal. 1861 isn't even a modular chrono movement, like some Speedies have. |
7 September 2015, 04:25 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
|
8 September 2015, 07:08 PM | #25 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,413
|
Say what!!!!
__________________
E |
8 September 2015, 07:31 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
So Solly
~~~I forgot to answer this for you, and that said, if anyone else ever expects an answer from me in this and any other thread, it's not that I am ignoring you, quite the contrary, I am not receiving thread notifications from this forum, despite asking to be notified... As to my statement about the chronograph function piggy backed onto the movement, for the life of me, back when I was researching the 3570.50 before purchase, I swear I read somewhere, that this in fact was how this caliber was created. If in fact it wasn't, do yourself a favor and don't get your tidy whites in a knot over my statement. Life is short, have fun, and don't believe everything you read on the internet, or in an internet forum |
7 September 2015, 04:27 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
IOW, they aren't running in sync
Put another way, when timing the 3570.50, the Chrono's second hand does not influence the time of the minute and hour hands...separate functions |
7 September 2015, 04:44 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 30
|
What is the most desirable speedy?
|
8 September 2015, 06:41 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Jake
Location: north central Fla
Watch: Omega SpeedMaster
Posts: 118
|
~~~the one on your wrist you could have three guys wanting Speedies and all three end up with different Speedmasters. My choice may not be desirable for someone else. Sorry, you have to figure out which one you want, and who knows, that may change before you pull the trigger. For instance, before settling on the Speedmaster (3570.50 in my case), I was sure I was going to purchase a chrono heritage blue Tudor but the more I thought about the orange and blue colour scheme, I decided on a more sedate chronograph and went with the Speedmaster If you end up deciding on the currently available model, that you can buy from an AD/trusted seller, give some thought about going with a used piece in good condition. Like a new car rolling off the lot, the new watch will suffer depreciation Just a thought |
8 September 2015, 01:07 AM | #30 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,465
|
Great watches. Love the look and heritage of the Speedy Pro.
Ended up selling mine after a year because I found the small crown made the daily wind a chore. Not so with my Seamasters. Good luck with your choice. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.