![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 33
|
Patek Aquanaut 5164a vs new 5164g
I was planning to get the 5164a for use as a travel watch but sadly it got discontinued. I preferred its black dial, steel construction and 120m WR. Would you recommend I get the 5164a at $75k usd secondary price or try to get new 5164g from AD (50/50 chance), and why?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: US
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,471
|
I like the 5164a better. I’d go grey and get that…seems you like the black version better anyway. Plus who knows if/when your AD might allocate you the new model.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,265
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 728
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: ireland
Watch: 5167a/216570 black
Posts: 309
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: US
Posts: 65
|
Quote:
Gold is a soft metal, get scratches very easily compared to steel. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: US
Posts: 680
|
I would definitely get the new white gold one.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Merica
Posts: 1,315
|
New one for sure
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 1,133
|
50/50 chance of getting allocated the 5164G at retail… crazy question to me on it even being a choice. Of course go with the 5164G.
But I agree with others, I’d pick a different travel watch. Personally I feel the aquanaut is too much watch for traveling. Doesn’t feel comfortable visiting unknown parts of the world wearing a watch that is highly recognizable by thieves and robbers. Whether you get the 5164A or 5164G, both to me have the same level of recognizability. If you’re traveling regularly to known parts that you’re comfortable with, then another reason to get the 5164G. Some say WG will scratch more, but I haven’t found that to be the case. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,236
|
Putting pricing and grey/retail aside, I’d much rather own the new 5164g. I think the blue grey coloring is done to perfection.
I’m not kicking the acier out of bed either though. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 741
|
If I could get the 5164g at retail I’d do that over buying grey. If you had to buy both at grey pricing I’d get the 5164a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,517
|
I have a 5164A and find it the perfect travel watch. I like the idea of the 5164G but when I tried one on, found it too “top heavy” for me, sorry to say.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: Slam Diego
Watch: 16233, 116619LB
Posts: 2,221
|
Quote:
I also would be a bit apprehensive to take this watch in whichever metal to parts unknown. LA to NYC, sure. But into Mogadishu, the Kalahari or Barcalona, no.
__________________
What's the time? It's time to get ill. Wishlist: 128236; 5396G; 15550ST; 384.029 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Dotonbori
Watch: Mostly blue dials
Posts: 7,877
|
I only have less than 0.1% chance of getting the G from AD but I will go for it. The G is jaw dropping gorgeous and the only Aquanaut I ever want.
438874934_898740495385351_1147464368653520492_n.jpg 438840637_421485173859881_923379833053064263_n.jpg @markkauzlarich |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,894
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Dotonbori
Watch: Mostly blue dials
Posts: 7,877
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: HK
Posts: 1,061
|
The white gold and blue does look more interesting than the black 5164. if you want lightweight, go for the 5167. it wears so comfy that it feels like it's not even there.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,507
|
Why not get both? Buy the 5164a grey while you wait to see if you are allocated the 5164g, then if you are you can sell the 5164a and not damage your patek relationship since you bought grey.
I do agree with Michael, the 5164G is truly spectacular. Still difficult to visually get over the phallic shaped GMT hand though.
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2024
Location: USA
Posts: 6
|
5167a all the way. I’ve been in this dilemma before. I tried in a 5164a and it’s way too thick. It’s a cool complication but I hated the date wheel, too hard to read and clutters the dial. 5167a is class, thin and light. Beautiful dial. Extremely legible and better lume.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: HK
Posts: 1,061
|
Quote:
The 5167 is so much more thinner, lighter, and you definitely won't accidently hit the buttons to the left. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: ireland
Watch: 5167a/216570 black
Posts: 309
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,375
|
The color of the new 5164G is just gorgeous but somehow the watch looks busier and less legible than the black dial 5164A to me.
That said, I'd love a 5968G in the new color. The green one is too loud for me and the dark blue a little boring in my eyes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: WG BLRO, Sub C, WG
Posts: 1,618
|
Patek Aquanaut 5164a vs new 5164g
Quote:
The 5968G in the new color would be epic. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: David Farkas
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116610, 5712/1A
Posts: 8,131
|
5164a for sure
if I was buying a white gold travel time aquanaut the only one to get is the 5650G
__________________
Instagram: @SwissWatchTime |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2024
Real Name: Frederic Wunsc
Location: USA
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
White gold case instead of steel Waterproofing reduced to 60m Slightly different aesthetic If you have a real chance (50%) of getting the 5164G from an AD, this might be a more economical option. However, it must be considered that the wait can be long and uncertain. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: US
Posts: 381
|
One of the key features of the 5164a (or 5167a) is that it is one of the most comfortable and light watches around. I would avoid anything that changes that but haven't tried on the 5164g to see how it feels. As a travel watch, and particularly vacation watch, 5164a, is about as perfect as it gets. Also, PP's travel time function is the best - a couple pushes and you are ready to go.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: New York
Posts: 72
|
is anyone bothered by how the numbers on the date wheel seem to flip upside down from 7 to 9 and 23 to 25?
somewhat reminds me of the subdials on the Daytona versus how they're implemented on the Speedy which has better legibility IMO. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Here!
Watch: 6098, 5513, 16700
Posts: 65
|
5164a all day
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.