The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex Reference Library

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 February 2008, 06:54 AM   #1
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,473
The Rolex Milgauss

Originally introduced in 1954 for people who worked around strong magnetic fields such as power plant workers, hospital employees, and research laboratories.

Current production models, using Faraday Cage construction, are good for work around 1,000 Gauss

Milgauss Reference Numbers: 6451, 1019, 116400

Date of production: 1954 to ~1986, 2007 to current

Movements: 1019 -1580 & 116400 - 3131

Case size: 1019-38mm; 116400 - 40mm

Weight: 116400 - 154 grams

Power Reserve: ~44 hours

Photographs:

Dial. Matt Black
(Photos courtesy of Mike)




__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member

Last edited by Tools; 23 April 2010 at 01:18 PM.. Reason: Contributions: Mike
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2008, 10:58 AM   #2
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Please allow me to qoute this nice overview over the history of the Milgauss watches, posted by Mike on 2008-05-25:

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
(...)

I'm certainly no expert on the Milgauss and will quickly defer to those who have done more research in the reference than I have. I did a bit of reading/research on the reference prior to getting mine.

Any discussion on the Milgauss must include the relationship between CERN--Counseil European pour la Recherche Nuclearire--a French concern based outside Geneva that controlls the world's largest cyclotron.

Born circa 1954 circumstantial evidence seems to find that CERN approached Rolex to create an anti-magnetic watch for use in it's enviornment.

The watch was to be used by scientists in magnetic fields and at least initially was not designed for public release.

It appears there were various incantations of the reference 6541 as Rolex refined the model with functions seemingly borrowed from the Submariner side of the house. This seems logical as this was the time Rolex was really getting into the "tool watch" business.

Never a popular model when finally released to the public the Milgauss now rests with the grails such as the Mil Sub and others.



PHOTO CREDIT BJSONLINE

Interestingly a much rarer model of the Milgauss than the 6541 exists, the reference 6543.

While the 6541 was anti-magnetic the 6543 was amagnetic. James Dowling indicates this was done by creating an escapement made from materials unaffected by magnetism and therefor rendering part of the farady cage in the Milgauss unnecessary. Estimates place the number of 6543s in existence at about 80. (CREDIT JAMES DOWLING)

In the 60s Rolex created another version of the Milgauss, the reference 1019.
The model used a 15xx movement and could be had in a couple of dial configurations including one called the CERN dial that was void of any luminous material. This was done, so they say, because CERN scientists working with the smallest particles of radiation could not have ANY radiation emitting from their watches. Estimates place the CERN version at around 5oo examples and information exists that the dial was at least an option to the general public. (though how well known an option I haven't a clue)

CERN DIAL 1019--CREDIT KEVIN O



That Rolex chose to release a modern version of the Milgauss I think speaks to the regard the reference is held in by the vintage community.



Hope this helps a little.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 July 2009, 11:53 AM   #3
bartonjet
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Watch: vintage gilt subs
Posts: 61
As a proud owner of a 1019, I am excited to get my GV soon.
bartonjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2010, 04:42 PM   #4
Evanjoe610
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Posts: 2
CERN DIAL 1019

I have this very same similar watch. Same dial and the model designation of 1019. When I brought into Rolex USA in NY, they thought that ti was a counterfeit, because none of the technician ever saw one! The watch had to go back to Switzerland for servicing. I bought my Milgauss in Belgium when I was touring Europe. What is this watch worth nowadays?

Evan
Evanjoe610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 January 2010, 06:24 AM   #5
Evanjoe610
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Robbinsville, NJ
Posts: 2
Guess that no one wanted to answer this one. I found out how rare it is, this morning. I was told with all the paperwork,box, and any service record, consider it to range from $35,000 and up.

Glad I found this website...



Quote:
Originally Posted by Evanjoe610 View Post
CERN DIAL 1019

I have this very same similar watch. Same dial and the model designation of 1019. When I brought into Rolex USA in NY, they thought that ti was a counterfeit, because none of the technician ever saw one! The watch had to go back to Switzerland for servicing. I bought my Milgauss in Belgium when I was touring Europe. What is this watch worth nowadays?

Evan
Evanjoe610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2013, 01:51 AM   #6
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
Please allow me to qoute this nice overview over the history of the Milgauss watches, posted by Mike on 2008-05-25:
Fascinated by the old 6541 - maybe someday I'll win the lottery!
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2013, 02:47 PM   #7
Speed Metal Army
"TRF" Member
 
Speed Metal Army's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The woods
Watch: SixSixSix
Posts: 133
Mine on a nato. I love the color of the dial. Black isn't totally accurate. I love this watch,and it shows!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1011443.jpg (111.9 KB, 1168 views)
File Type: jpg P1011444.jpg (112.1 KB, 1167 views)
Speed Metal Army is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2008, 01:35 PM   #8
shedlock2000
2024 Pledge Member
 
shedlock2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
Excellent thread, thanks guys, i have a question regarding Gauss, and tesla, whats the difference in measurment, and what numerical value makes the two equivilent, ?
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.


SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT
shedlock2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2008, 02:19 PM   #9
brainbizz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 608
I believe 1 Tesla is 10,000 Gauss
brainbizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2008, 02:45 PM   #10
shedlock2000
2024 Pledge Member
 
shedlock2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
Quote:
Originally Posted by brainbizz View Post
I believe 1 Tesla is 10,000 Gauss
Ahh, thanks, it came up in a recent thread. They made a amagnetic watch before, why did they not do this for the new release?
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it.


SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT
shedlock2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 May 2008, 11:05 PM   #11
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
As an interesting sidenote, the ONLY current Rolex watch that does not sport the laser etched coronet ("LEC") in the crystal is the Milgauss GV (green edged crystal):


(From a German watch forum. Pic originally posted by Jocke).
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 July 2008, 08:58 PM   #12
Tommasi
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England
Posts: 18
Newbie here



My dad has this watch, any idea how much it is worth? Im not sure if its this exact dial, or a normal white face though.
Tommasi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 July 2008, 02:31 PM   #13
cstegall
"TRF" Member
 
cstegall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Watch: YMII
Posts: 106
Thanks for this review. About to buy a Milgauss and this really helped.
__________________
7 people asked me today if I was rodeo or circus. Clown profiling should be illegal.
cstegall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 July 2008, 01:46 AM   #14
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
Nice report Everyone!!!
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2008, 07:16 AM   #15
Spare201
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Spare201
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1970 Day-Date
Posts: 197
You know I've wondered about the millgaus for a while. Doesn't the use of a parachrome hairspring and 904L kinda make the milgauss kinda, well redundant? The hairspring is really the only bit on a conventional watch that could be screwed up by magnetism. Parachrom kinda takes that out of the equation. All of the leaves and pinions are brass, pivots and bridges are steel though (still not enough for magnetism to cause a malfunction).
Spare201 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2009, 01:43 AM   #16
Vanessa CW21
TechXpert & 2016 Patron
 
Vanessa CW21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mx
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spare201 View Post
You know I've wondered about the millgaus for a while. Doesn't the use of a parachrome hairspring and 904L kinda make the milgauss kinda, well redundant? The hairspring is really the only bit on a conventional watch that could be screwed up by magnetism. Parachrom kinda takes that out of the equation. All of the leaves and pinions are brass, pivots and bridges are steel though (still not enough for magnetism to cause a malfunction).
That's not true. The rest of the movement can get magnetic and this will cause the watch to malfunction. Like the pallet fork and the escape wheel which are made out of steel too.
__________________
Member# 5731
Instagram: @vanessa.cw21

Watch my Rolex repair video: https://youtu.be/jDnaotCTpTA
Vanessa CW21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2009, 07:41 AM   #17
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanessa View Post
That's not true. The rest of the movement can get magnetic and this will cause the watch to malfunction. Like the pallet fork and the escape wheel which are made out of steel too.
The mainspring can also get magnetized which will cause erratic power applied to the gear-train...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 December 2009, 06:52 AM   #18
KarlFr
"TRF" Member
 
KarlFr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scandinavia
Watch: ♛
Posts: 1,330
great review, thanks!
KarlFr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2010, 03:52 AM   #19
1000ftSub
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,471
Thanks Larry, i am not sure if should get this watch or a GMT II C
1000ftSub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 February 2009, 07:11 AM   #20
masskc
"TRF" Member
 
masskc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: toronto
Watch: SS 16520 "L"
Posts: 103
does anyone know if the original GV's had the coronet engraving at 6pm? or sorry were at least attempted by rolex?

does anyone know why can it not be done?
masskc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 May 2009, 11:42 AM   #21
Fishbone
"TRF" Member
 
Fishbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: So Cal, US
Watch: ss yacht-master
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by masskc View Post
does anyone know if the original GV's had the coronet engraving at 6pm? or sorry were at least attempted by rolex?

does anyone know why can it not be done?

this link will answer at least one of your questions...

quote from the link below: "It is worth noting that the Milgauss GV does NOT sport the laser etched coronet at 6 in the crystal... It has been said that the laser etched coronet would be too obvious due to the green edged crystal. Other reports state that the laser etched coronet would simply be distorted due to the green crystal. The other two Milgauss models (both named "116400", too, but without the GV nomenclature) both sport the laser etched coronet:"


Fishbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2011, 08:57 AM   #22
Cosmographer
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Bret
Location: IL
Watch: Daytona SS 1988
Posts: 85
the milgauss is a nice looking watch---I was surprised to learn that it had been around so long---I'd never seen one before finding this forum. Maybe they aren't as common or maybe I didn't recognize them when I did see them---easier to spot the subs, etc..
Cosmographer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2009, 01:21 PM   #23
hflee55
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Andy
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY
Watch: Me Watching You!!
Posts: 3,260
this review might just make me want to go out to get the GV.
hflee55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2009, 06:21 PM   #24
Esquire
"TRF" Member
 
Esquire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gator Country
Watch: GMT-II Ceramic
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by hflee55 View Post
this review might just make me want to go out to get the GV.
It's not really going to resist anything magnetic in a hospital, to be quite honest. Resisting 1000 gauss is nothing when you look at modern medical equipment. That would be like having a watch that was waterproof to one foot for one second, and going for a swim in the ocean.
__________________
GMT-IIc, SMP, 312
Go Gators!
Esquire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 March 2009, 07:57 PM   #25
clonmult
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by mgarami View Post
anybody know how much the original ones are worth?
I've seen quotes all over the place.

Mine was passed down from grandfather->father->me, and when I received it in the mid 90s, went straight for a valuation (for insurance purposes). Came in at around £2k.

Then chatting to a watchmaker on a motoring forum about 18months back, I was informed that it was worth more like £20k.

A few weeks back I read that its more like £30k. But I'm sure I've seen mentions on here and elsewhere that it could be worth considerably more.

Which is somewhat of an indecent proposal.
clonmult is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2009, 08:16 AM   #26
PalmSpringsCaVault
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: palm springs CA
Watch: Plat.118296DayDate
Posts: 192
The milguass was a total flop once it was released, it drove down production numbers and became the rare item because it was intially rejected. Upon the release i only wonder if the white face less fancy onces will repeat the patern. I have watched them do nothing but fall in price as time goes on, they were a dealer to dealer item and expected to be really rear but there wasnt any total production numbers given and now they are everywhere, here in los angeles they are at almost every dealers booth. I think people want to replicate the rareness of the older one but its sad its gonna be a long time comming in my humble opinnion. The old ones are the most collected and saught after rolex of all time bring extremely high prices considering the orginiall retail cost.
PalmSpringsCaVault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 April 2009, 11:57 PM   #27
clonmult
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by PalmSpringsCaVault View Post
The old ones are the most collected and saught after rolex of all time bring extremely high prices considering the orginiall retail cost.
Do you have any details of what sort of prices original Milgauss have gone for over the last few years?

I'm definitely having mixed feelings on mine. I do love the feel of it, and the emotional value is absolutely huge, but there's a varying element within me that considers selling it on, and possibly buying a recent model milgauss (or other rolex) as a replacement.
clonmult is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2009, 06:44 AM   #28
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by clonmult View Post
Do you have any details of what sort of prices original Milgauss have gone for over the last few years?

I'm definitely having mixed feelings on mine. I do love the feel of it, and the emotional value is absolutely huge, but there's a varying element within me that considers selling it on, and possibly buying a recent model milgauss (or other rolex) as a replacement.
The original 6541 Milgauss is a rare beast indeed and will command £50,000+ depending on condition.

It's an auction house piece if you care to sell it.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2009, 08:01 PM   #29
clonmult
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southern UK
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshwatchman View Post
The original 6541 Milgauss is a rare beast indeed and will command £50,000+ depending on condition.

It's an auction house piece if you care to sell it.
Thats what I was told by a watchmaker last night. Mild surprise, as the first valuation I had on it circa 15 years ago, it was around £2k. Then 18 months ago it had gone up in value to about £20k.

And now £50k.

Ouch. And double ouch.
clonmult is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 April 2009, 07:41 AM   #30
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,227
Good review. Thanks.
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.