The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 December 2021, 10:45 AM   #1
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Need some help on this Red Sub

Hi experts. I am looking to acquire this piece below:

https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/f...rvice.5363182/

Any red flags? The seller said its all original except the insert. Can anyone chime in on the validity? ITs a big purchase so can’t be too careful. Really appreciate any input on this piece. Thanks in advance.
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 12:29 PM   #2
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,363
Initial thoughts:

- The seller has made a particular point of disclosing everthing about the watch and its service history. That's a good sign, as long as it comes with the related paperwork from LAWW. I'd ask to see this first - it's pretty much a legit authentication.

- I don't mind color-matched hands when they're done as well as that. That's some awesome work.

- There might be some room for negotiation due to the repaired/chipped dial (Who doesn't build a negotiation margin into their selling price?), although 23k isn't ridiculous in today's market.

- The days of holding out for a perfect all-original 1680 Red are pretty much gone. You'd be waiting a very long time and would need a very thick wallet.

Good luck with it.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 12:38 PM   #3
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
- The seller has made a particular point of disclosing everthing about the watch and its service history. That's a good sign, as long as it comes with the related paperwork from LAWW. I'd ask to see this first - it's pretty much a legit authentication.
I'm not saying that anything is wrong with the watch at all, but how is the fact that LAWW serviced the watch an authentication? I'm pretty sure they will work on whatever they are paid to work on. Not a counterfeit, obviously, but they would certainly service watches with franken parts, service parts, aftermarket parts, etc.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 12:52 PM   #4
zapokee
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
I'm not saying that anything is wrong with the watch at all, but how is the fact that LAWW serviced the watch an authentication? I'm pretty sure they will work on whatever they are paid to work on. Not a counterfeit, obviously, but they would certainly service watches with franken parts, service parts, aftermarket parts, etc.
Yes, you might be right. I don't know their policy regarding what they will/won't work on, but they have an excellent reputation to protect, so I assume they wouldn't associate themselves with anything dreadful.

I do accept your point that LAWW paperwork isn't definitive authentication, but I wouldn't consider it worthless. They're famously legit guys.

They actually serviced my 1680 Red when they were part of the old outfit, and did an amazing job.
zapokee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 11:32 PM   #5
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapokee View Post
Initial thoughts:

- The seller has made a particular point of disclosing everthing about the watch and its service history. That's a good sign, as long as it comes with the related paperwork from LAWW. I'd ask to see this first - it's pretty much a legit authentication.

- I don't mind color-matched hands when they're done as well as that. That's some awesome work.

- There might be some room for negotiation due to the repaired/chipped dial (Who doesn't build a negotiation margin into their selling price?), although 23k isn't ridiculous in today's market.

- The days of holding out for a perfect all-original 1680 Red are pretty much gone. You'd be waiting a very long time and would need a very thick wallet.

Good luck with it.
Thanks for the note. I have worked w LAWW def top notch
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 01:18 PM   #6
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,214
Not a knock on LAWW at all. I have also had work done by them on multiple occasions and I have only good things to say about them.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 04:15 PM   #7
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
The price isn't too insane, but I'm not sure I could live with those chips on the dial, especially ones that were "professionally repaired".
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 11:33 PM   #8
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
The price isn't too insane, but I'm not sure I could live with those chips on the dial, especially ones that were "professionally repaired".
True. One of my main concern to be honest and the fact that it can continue to degrade.
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2021, 10:18 AM   #9
tekno
2024 Pledge Member
 
tekno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor Snowflake
Posts: 1,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryLime View Post
The price isn't too insane, but I'm not sure I could live with those chips on the dial, especially ones that were "professionally repaired".

I didn’t see those right off. If they were repaired professionally they wouldn’t be such a eye sore I assume. The paint used is too black.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
tekno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 December 2021, 04:45 PM   #10
Andad
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,422
At that price point I would have expected pix of the movement and any case /case back corrosion?
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 12:57 PM   #11
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andad View Post
At that price point I would have expected pix of the movement and any case /case back corrosion?
I am not comfortable removing the case back once the service was completed by LAWW as it will compromise the seal (I'm not a watchmaker). I do have a picture of the movement in parts (courtesy of LAWW) and can assure any potential buyer that there is no corrosion and the movement is in great condition. (Should/could have requested LAWW to take a picture of the movement but I did not have plans to sell the watch until recently.)
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2021, 01:40 AM   #12
Ascari_2
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: US
Posts: 1,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhak22 View Post
I am not comfortable removing the case back once the service was completed by LAWW as it will compromise the seal (I'm not a watchmaker). I do have a picture of the movement in parts (courtesy of LAWW) and can assure any potential buyer that there is no corrosion and the movement is in great condition. (Should/could have requested LAWW to take a picture of the movement but I did not have plans to sell the watch until recently.)
As far as removing/replacing the caseback, ideally it should be done by someone with the appropriate tool like this https://www.esslinger.com/bergeon-57...proof-watches/. There is nothing particularly special about the seal itself assuming that you have a relatively fresh gasket. All that's required is sufficient torque to screw down the caseback and compress the seal between the metal surfaces. But simply removing and replacing the caseback between service intervals is not frowned upon. As an added check, a water pressure test can always reconfirm the tightness of all seals.
Ascari_2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 12:14 AM   #13
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,214
I'm definitely not an expert on 1680s, but my general impression is that it's a nice watch to wear, but not a top-notch collector example, so it depends what you are looking for. I guess that's the type of Red Sub you will get for $23k on the internet these days. It has been restored so that it can be enjoyed, with relumed hands and repairs on the dial (I see one on the edge by the 23-24 second marks), new crystal, serviced, etc. The case, bezel, and insert seem mediocre, but I'm sure it will be appealing overall on the wrist. As an aside, the photos are annoyingly small, uncropped, and low-res, but perhaps the seller will send better photos on request.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 01:12 AM   #14
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
I'm definitely not an expert on 1680s, but my general impression is that it's a nice watch to wear, but not a top-notch collector example, so it depends what you are looking for. I guess that's the type of Red Sub you will get for $23k on the internet these days. It has been restored so that it can be enjoyed, with relumed hands and repairs on the dial (I see one on the edge by the 23-24 second marks), new crystal, serviced, etc. The case, bezel, and insert seem mediocre, but I'm sure it will be appealing overall on the wrist. As an aside, the photos are annoyingly small, uncropped, and low-res, but perhaps the seller will send better photos on request.
Dan always appreciate your honest feedback. I agree with you on pretty much all accounts here. The chip on the dial is really what bugs me the most as well, especially if it continue to degrade over time.
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 12:52 PM   #15
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkc324 View Post
Dan always appreciate your honest feedback. I agree with you on pretty much all accounts here. The chip on the dial is really what bugs me the most as well, especially if it continue to degrade over time.
Tom, as far as I know, chips aren't something that continues to degrade like other dial damage (ie. dial lacquer starts to degrade, lume patina, etc.).
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 12:54 PM   #16
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
I'm definitely not an expert on 1680s, but my general impression is that it's a nice watch to wear, but not a top-notch collector example, so it depends what you are looking for. I guess that's the type of Red Sub you will get for $23k on the internet these days. It has been restored so that it can be enjoyed, with relumed hands and repairs on the dial (I see one on the edge by the 23-24 second marks), new crystal, serviced, etc. The case, bezel, and insert seem mediocre, but I'm sure it will be appealing overall on the wrist. As an aside, the photos are annoyingly small, uncropped, and low-res, but perhaps the seller will send better photos on request.
Yes, I need to resize (ie. make smaller) for online image hosting reasons (although I could probably find a different provider) but always willing to send/share the original high-res images over email/text.
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 10:07 PM   #17
gilel
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Paris, France
Watch: Rolex white 1680
Posts: 51
Hi all,
The case seems overpolished on one side (very thin lug).
Am I wrong ?
gilel
gilel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 December 2021, 11:22 PM   #18
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by gilel View Post
Hi all,
The case seems overpolished on one side (very thin lug).
Am I wrong ?
gilel
All older cases like these, that were originally hand-cut, have different lug sizes to begin with. If a case has been subsequently polished over the years, it’s logical that the thinnest lug to begin with will suffer the most.
That said, I’d be very happy with this case considering its age.
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 04:54 AM   #19
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingface66 View Post
All older cases like these, that were originally hand-cut, have different lug sizes to begin with. If a case has been subsequently polished over the years, it’s logical that the thinnest lug to begin with will suffer the most.
That said, I’d be very happy with this case considering its age.
Agreed. the case is not bad for its age. i have seen way worse thats for sure
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 02:37 AM   #20
Ascari_2
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: US
Posts: 1,357
Amplitude of 224 in the dial-up position with the graph that it has on the time grapher is indicative of the watch needing a full overhaul. In my experience, the bare minimum amplitude for a Cal 15xx movement should be around 250 with a stable graph. As you start to approach the low 200s, that's clearly time for a service. Also, the non-straight graph would give me slight pause for concern.

That said, servicing one of these movements is fairly straight forward and unless you need new parts like a balance wheel with hairspring (which can run about $500) the cost would be between $300 and $700 from an independent.

As an example, here's one of my watches https://postimg.cc/Q9n6twvN (albeit this is with a 3035 movement, but the principles are the same).

As a final comment, the watch might not have been wound when the picture was taken ... though that would be odd since that's how you normally use the time grapher and you'd think that the person knows about it if they have access to it.
Ascari_2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 04:55 AM   #21
tkc324
"TRF" Member
 
tkc324's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Chi town
Watch: Daytona AP DD Sub
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascari_2 View Post
Amplitude of 224 in the dial-up position with the graph that it has on the time grapher is indicative of the watch needing a full overhaul. In my experience, the bare minimum amplitude for a Cal 15xx movement should be around 250 with a stable graph. As you start to approach the low 200s, that's clearly time for a service. Also, the non-straight graph would give me slight pause for concern.

That said, servicing one of these movements is fairly straight forward and unless you need new parts like a balance wheel with hairspring (which can run about $500) the cost would be between $300 and $700 from an independent.

As an example, here's one of my watches https://postimg.cc/Q9n6twvN (albeit this is with a 3035 movement, but the principles are the same).

As a final comment, the watch might not have been wound when the picture was taken ... though that would be odd since that's how you normally use the time grapher and you'd think that the person knows about it if they have access to it.

Great input. Really appreciate it. Something that I would have never thought to ask to be honest
tkc324 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 12:46 PM   #22
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascari_2 View Post
Amplitude of 224 in the dial-up position with the graph that it has on the time grapher is indicative of the watch needing a full overhaul. In my experience, the bare minimum amplitude for a Cal 15xx movement should be around 250 with a stable graph. As you start to approach the low 200s, that's clearly time for a service. Also, the non-straight graph would give me slight pause for concern.

That said, servicing one of these movements is fairly straight forward and unless you need new parts like a balance wheel with hairspring (which can run about $500) the cost would be between $300 and $700 from an independent.

As an example, here's one of my watches https://postimg.cc/Q9n6twvN (albeit this is with a 3035 movement, but the principles are the same).

As a final comment, the watch might not have been wound when the picture was taken ... though that would be odd since that's how you normally use the time grapher and you'd think that the person knows about it if they have access to it.
Appreciate the notes! I am the seller of the watch in question here and will admit, I don't know what I'm doing with the timegrapher, :) I am now realizing I probably should have done my due diligence in fully understanding how to leverage it before taking photos of a 5-figure watch with it. However, the watch was fully serviced by LAWW just this year so highly doubt it needs a "full overhaul" or a service. Simply my mistake in not winding the watch fully nor taking readings in different positions. Apologies, Tom/all.
__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2021, 01:33 AM   #23
Ascari_2
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: US
Posts: 1,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhak22 View Post
Appreciate the notes! I am the seller of the watch in question here and will admit, I don't know what I'm doing with the timegrapher, :) I am now realizing I probably should have done my due diligence in fully understanding how to leverage it before taking photos of a 5-figure watch with it. However, the watch was fully serviced by LAWW just this year so highly doubt it needs a "full overhaul" or a service. Simply my mistake in not winding the watch fully nor taking readings in different positions. Apologies, Tom/all.
dbhak22, glad for some feedback. Unfortunately, people are gong off of the pictures that they see and without the benefit of your explanation the pictures raise questions.

For your own benefit I would wind the watch fully and retake that picture. I am certainly not questioning the veracity of the watch being serviced by LAWW. Just saying that you'd be much better off with a picture showing the watch running as it should after being serviced rather than showing something that will create doubt in the buyer's mind.
Ascari_2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2021, 08:29 AM   #24
dbhak22
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
dbhak22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Daniel
Location: PNW
Watch: ♛
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ascari_2 View Post
dbhak22, glad for some feedback. Unfortunately, people are gong off of the pictures that they see and without the benefit of your explanation the pictures raise questions.

For your own benefit I would wind the watch fully and retake that picture. I am certainly not questioning the veracity of the watch being serviced by LAWW. Just saying that you'd be much better off with a picture showing the watch running as it should after being serviced rather than showing something that will create doubt in the buyer's mind.
Really appreciate the tips! I did as you said (wind the watch fully) and sure enough, the readings look much better, :)

I was completing doing myself a disservice with the previous photo (which I'll append to my listing)...

__________________
GMT II (16710) | Explorer I (1016) | Datejust I (116234) | Submariner (1680) | Day-Date (1803) | Royal Oak (25594) | FOIS (2998 spec) | Submariner (16808)
dbhak22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 December 2021, 08:38 AM   #25
Ascari_2
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: US
Posts: 1,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by dbhak22 View Post
Really appreciate the tips! I did as you said (wind the watch fully) and sure enough, the readings look much better, :)



I was completing doing myself a disservice with the previous photo (which I'll append to my listing)...



Now that's a serviced movement.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
__________________
NAWCC Member
Ascari_2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 07:02 AM   #26
karleone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,269
Case has been polished but it's pretty well done. A lot of information on the watch and transparency from the dealer that's good. I don't like the difference in coulours on plots on the dial (darker and lighter shades). That would bother me!
karleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 07:30 AM   #27
SaintMickey
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 885
Man I have clearly moved on from vintage. 23k is INSANE in my world... depending on how long one has done this I guess ruined me personally. Not that many years ago at 11k I'd be in. Not saying many won't pay that but...it didn't go yet.

I guess once you buy a new one at MSRP perspective changes dramatically.
SaintMickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 07:45 AM   #28
michaelodonnell123
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: Michael
Location: NJ
Watch: Panerai 112
Posts: 1,172
For that price, I expect a watch in much better condition. That one is all beat up.
michaelodonnell123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 December 2021, 07:58 AM   #29
SaintMickey
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelodonnell123 View Post
For that price, I expect a watch in much better condition. That one is all beat up.
Yeah nice polish, new dial, hands and insert and BOOM!
SaintMickey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.