![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: York
Posts: 9
|
Submariner 14060M
I'm going to buy a 14060M submariner and would like to know if the 4 line version has a more accurate movement than the 2 line.
I have read conflicting information with some saying they are exactly the same and others saying that only the 4 line meets the Superlative Chronometer standard. Can anyone give a definitive answer? I prefer the cleaner look of the 2 line but accuracy really matters to me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,742
|
They are exactly the same movements, one went through COSC certification and one did not. The movement in the 2 line could be regulated to the COSC standard.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Ian
Location: Hamburg
Watch: Sub 14060
Posts: 1,143
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 237
|
My two liner is the most accurate watch in my collection
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Scotland
Posts: 252
|
What a boring question. Literally pish....Has to be Borg generated?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 X2 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,918
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denver
Posts: 223
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 220
|
Quote:
Confucius is alleged to have said: The man who asks a question is a fool for a minute, the man who does not ask is a fool for life. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,853
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,371
|
No idea if it is more accurate but it is different. The "M" stands for "Modified". Different caliber designation too; 3000 vs 3130. Think the "M" has a full balance bridge, maybe a few other enhancements.
Never mind, I miss-read the question. Yes the 2 and 4 line M models have the same movement. Last edited by csaltphoto; 4 February 2022 at 10:45 AM.. Reason: Correction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Russ
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 5,760
|
The 2 line and 4 line 14060M is exactly the same. As previously stated a 14060 has a different movement.
__________________
Russ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Jeff
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,420
|
Both are great watches and classics. I will say if accuracy is your jam you might not want an automatic watch. What are you after? Perhaps some more context and we could be more helpful.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,194
|
Welcome!
As another poster mentioned, you may find more of a difference in potential accuracy/precision between the 14060 and the 14060M models as the movements are different. Amongst the 4-liner 14060M models, the latest serials of them have a parachrom bleu hairspring, which may have potentially better accuracy and more anti-magnetic. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: 5-digit steel
Posts: 384
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Merica
Posts: 1,315
|
The two line is way cooler, thats what matters most. Either is accurate enough.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: FL
Watch: ♛ & ✠
Posts: 943
|
i'd get the more elegant 2 lined dial version; as others have mentioned- movement can always be regulated by a watchmaker.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Asia
Watch: 5-digit steel
Posts: 384
|
It’s because the symmetry of the two liner is unmatched. And there will never be another 2 liner sub in the future.
__________________
♛ Submariner 14060m, 2-line ♛ Explorer II 16570, polar ♛ Cosmograph Daytona 16520, white dial |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 116710 BLNR
Posts: 34,404
|
Precision is the word we should use in this context.
A watch's accuracy is determined in relation to an official time, such as NIST or observatory time. If I have a watch that is precise to one second in 25 billion years, it will be inaccurate, if in my haste I set it five minutes slow or fast. I love my 14060M. Fewer lines of text are not necessarily more elegant. In this case, they are equally elegant. ![]()
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 128
|
![]() Great watch. Can’t recommend enough Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Nottingham UK
Posts: 60
|
4 liners appear to be attracting higher asking prices at the moment, probably being seen as a future collectable due to their short production run. Last of the best.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,766
|
Quote:
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,034
|
I prefer the 4-liner as it reminds me of the 5512 vs the 5513. I know those two had different movements, but makes me think the 4-liner is superior.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Nottingham UK
Posts: 60
|
4 liner is more symmetrical.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,234
|
My 2001 14060M is the most accurate watch I have.
Runs fast about 2 seconds/week. I can correct that by leaving it 6 up overnight. Last serviced about 3 years ago.
__________________
E |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,170
|
If accuracy is your primary concern you can do better than a mechanical watch but I suspect you know this.
Now. You want the two-liner. Repeat after me; “I want the two-liner I want the two-liner.” These damn fancy Subs in blue, green, gold are posers. Posers I say! And do NOT get me started on that weird goiter thing some have. Cut it off! Just cut it off! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: York
Posts: 9
|
Thank you all very much.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,821
|
Submariner 14060M
Yes.
Quote:
I own a 14060M (K-serial) with the 3130 movement. Its caliber is very accurate AND very precise. I measured Amplitudes, Rates, and Precision of 32xx and 31xx calibers. https://www.rolexforums.com/showpost...postcount=1232 The 3130 data points were taken for my 14060M. ![]() ![]() Even towards the end of the power reserve and at low amplitude (150 degrees) the 3130 remained very precise (0.5 s/d). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 464
|
My Y series 2 liner gains less than 1 second per day...
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Real Name: Will
Location: PacNW, USA
Watch: 16610/126610LV
Posts: 360
|
As so many have already said. The 2 liner and 4 liner 14060M's both have the same movement. The 4 liners were sent to COSC for certification and the two liners were not.
For me I just like the symmetry of the two liner more... 14060M 12_14_2021_1.jpeg |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,346
|
Quote:
My school of thought is that Rolex routinely sends all of their movements in for COSC testing and never set aside others, that are made at the same time, only to go into Subs. It should also be noted that a movement is only COSC tested once, then nobody ever tests it again, regardless of how it operates. I have thought that it was a choice by Rolex to keep the Sub as near to the original look as possible, hence, a minimalist dial. Possibly it was more perception that people want a "chronometer", or they were setting the table for the ensuing ceramic COSC model. Mine don't run any differently than a COSC version. SSSub2 copy.jpg
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.