Talk me out of the Air King

[Marciano]

So, here’s my situation: I currently own a 116500 black Daytona and the Batgirl (GMT-Master II with Jubilee bracelet). I’m looking to add a third piece to my collection, and I keep finding myself drawn to the new 126900 Air King. I’ve handled it a few times in person, and there’s something about the slimness that appeals to me, especially compared to the Sub41. Plus, I think the dial has a quirky, adventurous charm to it.

That said, I have a lot of friends urging me in other directions. They’re suggesting I go for a classic like the no-date Submariner or even make a move into something with gold. But something keeps pulling me back to the Air King. It feels different, almost like it’s calling to be the unique piece in my collection alongside the Daytona and GMT.

So… convince me why the Air King isn’t the right choice! I want to hear all the reasons why I might regret going this route instead of following the more traditional advice to get a Sub or a gold piece. Thanks in advance for helping me keep my collection balanced (and my wallet intact)!

[116510lv]

Originally Posted by Marciano

So, here’s my situation: I currently own a 116500 black Daytona and the Batgirl (GMT-Master II with Jubilee bracelet). I’m looking to add a third piece to my collection, and I keep finding myself drawn to the new 126900 Air King. I’ve handled it a few times in person, and there’s something about the slimness that appeals to me, especially compared to the Sub41. Plus, I think the dial has a quirky, adventurous charm to it.



That said, I have a lot of friends urging me in other directions. They’re suggesting I go for a classic like the no-date Submariner or even make a move into something with gold. But something keeps pulling me back to the Air King. It feels different, almost like it’s calling to be the unique piece in my collection alongside the Daytona and GMT.



So… convince me why the Air King isn’t the right choice! I want to hear all the reasons why I might regret going this route instead of following the more traditional advice to get a Sub or a gold piece. Thanks in advance for helping me keep my collection balanced (and my wallet intact)!

The allure of the Air King 126900 is understandable—it’s distinct, versatile, and has a quirky dial design that stands out, especially compared to the classics. That said, here are some reasons why it might not be the best third piece for your collection right now....

1. The Icon Factor

Compared to the Submariner: The no-date Submariner has a status that’s nearly unmatched in the Rolex lineup. With its heritage and versatility, it's a model that can easily complement the Daytona and GMT-Master II in terms of both style and stature. The Air King, on the other hand, doesn’t carry the same universal appeal or iconic status, which might leave it feeling.... a little less special over time.

Future Value Retention: The Submariner (especially a classic no-date version) holds its value exceptionally well, while the Air King, despite improvements, doesn’t have the same track record. If part of your strategy is to hold or appreciate value over time, a Sub would give you a better position there.


2. Design Continuity and Balance

Quirkiness vs. Timelessness: While the Air King’s dial certainly has personality, it’s a bit unconventional compared to the Daytona’s balanced chronograph layout and the GMT’s iconic bezel. In a collection, it might not have the same timeless look that will age as gracefully as the Submariner or a classic gold piece.

Rolex DNA: The Submariner and GMT both represent iconic pillars of Rolex design. The Air King does not carry the same Rolex DNA


3. Understated but Overlooked

Versatility: The Submariner is endlessly versatile, transitioning from casual to formal with ease. While the Air King has a certain appeal, it lacks the universal styling flexibility that the Sub can offer. A watch like the Sub or even an Explorer might wear just as slim while offering more versatility in wardrobe pairing and daily wear.

Risk of Getting Overlooked: The Air King’s eccentricity might feel novel and fun now, but it risks becoming that piece in your collection that doesn't get as much wrist time because it lacks the timeless appeal that makes the Sub so wearable every day.


4. The Unique Factor—Too Unique?

While you’re right that the Air King could be the "unique" piece of the trio, it’s worth considering whether that uniqueness will keep its charm in the long run. The quirky factor can make it an odd piece out rather than a defining statement, especially when compared to the solid and balanced design language of the Daytona and GMT. The novelty could wear off faster, making you question the decision a few years down the line.


5. Gold—A Taste of the Luxe Side

If you’re considering adding something with gold, it could bring a whole new dimension to your collection. A Submariner or GMT with a touch of gold (two-tone or solid) could be that unique and adventurous addition you’re craving while still being versatile and classic. It would also add some variety in materials, balancing the all-steel look of your Daytona and GMT. Rolex’s use of precious metals elevates the feel and experience, bringing a bit more of that “wow” factor every time you put it on.


6. A Potential "One and Done" Model

Air King Limited Appeal: Many collectors get an Air King as a one-off piece—something to enjoy but not necessarily to keep forever. It’s the type of model that could be a novelty within a larger collection, but it might not have that “keeper” status in the way a Submariner or gold-accented piece could.


In short, while the Air King is a cool watch, it could easily end up being the odd man out in a Daytona-GMT trio. Going with a Submariner would bring a level of enduring style, value retention, and continuity that rounds out a collection. Or if you crave a unique twist, a two-tone model could give you that bit of adventure while still aligning with the established icons Rolex is known for.

But if you’re genuinely drawn to it, that passion for the piece should also carry weight! Just be sure it’s a long-term connection, not just the pull of novelty.



Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

[Guppydriver]

Originally Posted by 116510lv

The allure of the Air King 126900 is understandable—it’s distinct, versatile, and has a quirky dial design that stands out, especially compared to the classics. That said, here are some reasons why it might not be the best third piece for your collection right now....

1. The Icon Factor

Compared to the Submariner: The no-date Submariner has a status that’s nearly unmatched in the Rolex lineup. With its heritage and versatility, it's a model that can easily complement the Daytona and GMT-Master II in terms of both style and stature. The Air King, on the other hand, doesn’t carry the same universal appeal or iconic status, which might leave it feeling.... a little less special over time.

Future Value Retention: The Submariner (especially a classic no-date version) holds its value exceptionally well, while the Air King, despite improvements, doesn’t have the same track record. If part of your strategy is to hold or appreciate value over time, a Sub would give you a better position there.


2. Design Continuity and Balance

Quirkiness vs. Timelessness: While the Air King’s dial certainly has personality, it’s a bit unconventional compared to the Daytona’s balanced chronograph layout and the GMT’s iconic bezel. In a collection, it might not have the same timeless look that will age as gracefully as the Submariner or a classic gold piece.

Rolex DNA: The Submariner and GMT both represent iconic pillars of Rolex design. The Air King does not carry the same Rolex DNA


3. Understated but Overlooked

Versatility: The Submariner is endlessly versatile, transitioning from casual to formal with ease. While the Air King has a certain appeal, it lacks the universal styling flexibility that the Sub can offer. A watch like the Sub or even an Explorer might wear just as slim while offering more versatility in wardrobe pairing and daily wear.

Risk of Getting Overlooked: The Air King’s eccentricity might feel novel and fun now, but it risks becoming that piece in your collection that doesn't get as much wrist time because it lacks the timeless appeal that makes the Sub so wearable every day.


4. The Unique Factor—Too Unique?

While you’re right that the Air King could be the "unique" piece of the trio, it’s worth considering whether that uniqueness will keep its charm in the long run. The quirky factor can make it an odd piece out rather than a defining statement, especially when compared to the solid and balanced design language of the Daytona and GMT. The novelty could wear off faster, making you question the decision a few years down the line.


5. Gold—A Taste of the Luxe Side

If you’re considering adding something with gold, it could bring a whole new dimension to your collection. A Submariner or GMT with a touch of gold (two-tone or solid) could be that unique and adventurous addition you’re craving while still being versatile and classic. It would also add some variety in materials, balancing the all-steel look of your Daytona and GMT. Rolex’s use of precious metals elevates the feel and experience, bringing a bit more of that “wow” factor every time you put it on.


6. A Potential "One and Done" Model

Air King Limited Appeal: Many collectors get an Air King as a one-off piece—something to enjoy but not necessarily to keep forever. It’s the type of model that could be a novelty within a larger collection, but it might not have that “keeper” status in the way a Submariner or gold-accented piece could.


In short, while the Air King is a cool watch, it could easily end up being the odd man out in a Daytona-GMT trio. Going with a Submariner would bring a level of enduring style, value retention, and continuity that rounds out a collection. Or if you crave a unique twist, a two-tone model could give you that bit of adventure while still aligning with the established icons Rolex is known for.

But if you’re genuinely drawn to it, that passion for the piece should also carry weight! Just be sure it’s a long-term connection, not just the pull of novelty.



Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

Now this is what I call an answer to a question. Well done.

OP, read these and if you still want the AK….GO FOR IT!

[cascadez71]

Originally Posted by Guppydriver

Now this is what I call an answer to a question. Well done.

OP, read these and if you still want the AK….GO FOR IT!

That reply is probably an AI response, it is literally is formatted and written like a Chatgpt answer.

[msum]

Originally Posted by 116510lv

The allure of the Air King 126900 is understandable—it’s distinct, versatile, and has a quirky dial design that stands out, especially compared to the classics. That said, here are some reasons why it might not be the best third piece for your collection right now....

1. The Icon Factor

Compared to the Submariner: The no-date Submariner has a status that’s nearly unmatched in the Rolex lineup. With its heritage and versatility, it's a model that can easily complement the Daytona and GMT-Master II in terms of both style and stature. The Air King, on the other hand, doesn’t carry the same universal appeal or iconic status, which might leave it feeling.... a little less special over time.

Future Value Retention: The Submariner (especially a classic no-date version) holds its value exceptionally well, while the Air King, despite improvements, doesn’t have the same track record. If part of your strategy is to hold or appreciate value over time, a Sub would give you a better position there.


2. Design Continuity and Balance

Quirkiness vs. Timelessness: While the Air King’s dial certainly has personality, it’s a bit unconventional compared to the Daytona’s balanced chronograph layout and the GMT’s iconic bezel. In a collection, it might not have the same timeless look that will age as gracefully as the Submariner or a classic gold piece.

Rolex DNA: The Submariner and GMT both represent iconic pillars of Rolex design. The Air King does not carry the same Rolex DNA


3. Understated but Overlooked

Versatility: The Submariner is endlessly versatile, transitioning from casual to formal with ease. While the Air King has a certain appeal, it lacks the universal styling flexibility that the Sub can offer. A watch like the Sub or even an Explorer might wear just as slim while offering more versatility in wardrobe pairing and daily wear.

Risk of Getting Overlooked: The Air King’s eccentricity might feel novel and fun now, but it risks becoming that piece in your collection that doesn't get as much wrist time because it lacks the timeless appeal that makes the Sub so wearable every day.


4. The Unique Factor—Too Unique?

While you’re right that the Air King could be the "unique" piece of the trio, it’s worth considering whether that uniqueness will keep its charm in the long run. The quirky factor can make it an odd piece out rather than a defining statement, especially when compared to the solid and balanced design language of the Daytona and GMT. The novelty could wear off faster, making you question the decision a few years down the line.


5. Gold—A Taste of the Luxe Side

If you’re considering adding something with gold, it could bring a whole new dimension to your collection. A Submariner or GMT with a touch of gold (two-tone or solid) could be that unique and adventurous addition you’re craving while still being versatile and classic. It would also add some variety in materials, balancing the all-steel look of your Daytona and GMT. Rolex’s use of precious metals elevates the feel and experience, bringing a bit more of that “wow” factor every time you put it on.


6. A Potential "One and Done" Model

Air King Limited Appeal: Many collectors get an Air King as a one-off piece—something to enjoy but not necessarily to keep forever. It’s the type of model that could be a novelty within a larger collection, but it might not have that “keeper” status in the way a Submariner or gold-accented piece could.


In short, while the Air King is a cool watch, it could easily end up being the odd man out in a Daytona-GMT trio. Going with a Submariner would bring a level of enduring style, value retention, and continuity that rounds out a collection. Or if you crave a unique twist, a two-tone model could give you that bit of adventure while still aligning with the established icons Rolex is known for.

But if you’re genuinely drawn to it, that passion for the piece should also carry weight! Just be sure it’s a long-term connection, not just the pull of novelty.



Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

Was this indeed AI generated?

Regardless, it seems to put forward some reasonable points.

Nevertheless, it seems fairly obvious that you should buy the AK, since it seems to appeal so strongly. I actually like the updates, but I’m no vintage expert. I certainly don’t think it’s as classic as a Submariner and it doesn’t have Glidelock (good and bad, depending on one’s perspective).

[tlbarrs]

Sorry I can’t talk you out of it ! You should [emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]][emoji[emoji[emoji6]][emoji[emoji6]]]% buy it it’s obviously calling to you and that’s what really matters forget about value retention and icon status and buy what sings to you and you will be much happier long term than buying one just because your friends rate it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Andad]

I think the Air King is nice model to own.

But then I also think my Milgauss GV is a keeper.

[brandrea]

Go for it. I really like the latest iteration

[Nyl]

Originally Posted by Marciano

So, here’s my situation: I currently own a 116500 black Daytona and the Batgirl (GMT-Master II with Jubilee bracelet). I’m looking to add a third piece to my collection, and I keep finding myself drawn to the new 126900 Air King. I’ve handled it a few times in person, and there’s something about the slimness that appeals to me, especially compared to the Sub41. Plus, I think the dial has a quirky, adventurous charm to it.

That said, I have a lot of friends urging me in other directions. They’re suggesting I go for a classic like the no-date Submariner or even make a move into something with gold. But something keeps pulling me back to the Air King. It feels different, almost like it’s calling to be the unique piece in my collection alongside the Daytona and GMT.

So… convince me why the Air King isn’t the right choice! I want to hear all the reasons why I might regret going this route instead of following the more traditional advice to get a Sub or a gold piece. Thanks in advance for helping me keep my collection balanced (and my wallet intact)!

Don't listen to other people. Most of them prefer to follow the trends, have a watch that everybody owns (Submariner in that case) or a watch that has a high re-sell value. A watch is an emotional object and you'll be the one dealing with your emotions.
If you like the Air King and you know you'll wear it: buy it!

[travisb]

Sounds like you've already made your mind up. Go with it!
It's an iconic reference in it's own right.

[ratty]

Buy what you want, not what others think you should.

[Lesnerelli23]

Originally Posted by ratty

Buy what you want, not what others think you should.

This! Plus that watch is cool af.

Sounds like your friends care about the wrong things for watches.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[MarioB83]

It was my second Rolex and is a watch that can really enjoy without any concerns regarding people looking at it, receiving weird looks and beat it up without any issue due to the brushed surfaces (except the bezel).
Great daily, special dial, great money for value...all pro's in my opinion

[Harry-57]

Originally Posted by Marciano

That said, I have a lot of friends urging me in other directions.

Who cares what they think? Are you buying it for them? If you want it and you like it, go for it. Life is too short.

My personal view, the one that I apply to me, is that if you are having second thoughts or being persuaded to think twice, maybe you don't want is much is you believe? A quick reality check never hurts, even if it's just a stepping stone to buying it.

[1William]

I don't like the Air-King. I have tried and even had the ability to buy one from my AD and still could not make it work for me. When the new design came out someone said it looked like Rolex threw up on the dial. I could not summarize it better. The classic and iconic Submariner would be my choice to go with the two others you have. Just because you can, does not mean that you should.

[kwcross]

I am of no help; I think the AK is great! Probably my favorite pilot-style watch currently in production.

[Marcjvr]

Originally Posted by Marciano

So, here’s my situation: I currently own a 116500 black Daytona and the Batgirl (GMT-Master II with Jubilee bracelet). I’m looking to add a third piece to my collection, and I keep finding myself drawn to the new 126900 Air King. I’ve handled it a few times in person, and there’s something about the slimness that appeals to me, especially compared to the Sub41. Plus, I think the dial has a quirky, adventurous charm to it.

That said, I have a lot of friends urging me in other directions. They’re suggesting I go for a classic like the no-date Submariner or even make a move into something with gold. But something keeps pulling me back to the Air King. It feels different, almost like it’s calling to be the unique piece in my collection alongside the Daytona and GMT.

So… convince me why the Air King isn’t the right choice! I want to hear all the reasons why I might regret going this route instead of following the more traditional advice to get a Sub or a gold piece. Thanks in advance for helping me keep my collection balanced (and my wallet intact)!

It’s good enough for Gordon Ramsay

Why is it not good enough for your friends?

[Andad]

Originally Posted by Marcjvr

It’s good enough for Gordon Ramsay

Why is it not good enough for your friends?

You will give the AirKing a bad name.

[aboutime]

It’s a great watch, you’ll love the airking especially the later reference. I have one together with a gmt master II (5 digit ref). I’ve been trying to convince myself I need a sub, but even with this two watches in isolation, I can’t see myself diving into a sub (especially a no date ref). To me, there just isn’t enough difference.

[michael6120]

You have a Daytona and a Batgirl! You have some big bases already covered! Honestly I would go for the Airking. I too think it’s a super cool watch. I can understand it being an odd purchase if you didn’t already have some heavy hitter Rolex’, but as it turns out you already have those other two amazing watches.

[DVDA]

Some of these replies such as It doesn't have "status" people won't recognize it etc., make it seem like people don't like the Air King because it's the least expensive model in the lineup. Are they thinking "I don't want the Air King because no one will realize it's a Rolex? Or if they realize it's a Rolex they will think I am broke cause it's the cheapest one?"

I buy a watch because I like it. I don't care what people think. I'll wear a very expensive watch to a bar and a citizen beater to a black tie event. Who cares. If you like the Air King get the Air King. I fly as a hobby so I am drawn to pilot watches so I like the lastest Air Kings. The old ones not so much. Will I get one? Probably eventually but not at over MSRP.

[CaptT]

The newest Air-King is awesome, no talking you out of it here. Crown guards, flip lock clasp, “improved” dial, all cool features of the latest iteration. And sized right for daily wear.

Seems to be a polarizing model, mostly because some think the dial is too much. On the wrist, the dial is just not as obvious as it appears in pictures; as you said, it’s got a quirky adventurous charm.

Downright cool model, go for it!

[Zach69SS]

Air king is a Yes, I really like the new one. All the updates are great. Good daily.


Cheers,

[Thomas Mudge]

Most people also have no idea that the Air King is equipped with the fame cage as a Milgauss.
That's a huge selling point in my eyes!!

The old model 116900 has it
They removed it for the new model??

[Lesnerelli23]

Originally Posted by Thomas Mudge

Most people also have no idea that the Air King is equipped with the fame cage as a Milgauss.
That's a huge selling point in my eyes!!

The old model 116900 has it
They removed it for the new model??

I did not realize that as well.

However, it would seem they’ve probably removed now as the cage is inconsequential with the materials they’ve been using in the movements of late. The anti magnetic properties of the Milgauss are basically standard at this point on everything. (As I understand it)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kopi-c]

Originally Posted by Marciano

So, here’s my situation: I currently own a 116500 black Daytona and the Batgirl (GMT-Master II with Jubilee bracelet). I’m looking to add a third piece to my collection, and I keep finding myself drawn to the new 126900 Air King. I’ve handled it a few times in person, and there’s something about the slimness that appeals to me, especially compared to the Sub41. Plus, I think the dial has a quirky, adventurous charm to it.

That said, I have a lot of friends urging me in other directions. They’re suggesting I go for a classic like the no-date Submariner or even make a move into something with gold. But something keeps pulling me back to the Air King. It feels different, almost like it’s calling to be the unique piece in my collection alongside the Daytona and GMT.

So… convince me why the Air King isn’t the right choice! I want to hear all the reasons why I might regret going this route instead of following the more traditional advice to get a Sub or a gold piece. Thanks in advance for helping me keep my collection balanced (and my wallet intact)!

Get a DateJust and forget about the Air King.

[cdmorenot]

It's a dog of a watch.

I would love to own one.

[996marty]

Ok here goes. Don’t do it

[Funkle]

Since you asked.. I love the Air-king design and would probably eventually own one IF it didn't say Air-King on it! That's a deal breaker for me, the script looks like it belongs on a vent-a-hood or vintage oscillating fan or something. Can't get past it

[CH69]

The large digits and colour logo is taking sometime for me to like it (still in progress but moving in the right direction), but clearly you don’t have the same issue with it, so follow your heart.