ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 January 2022, 08:26 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Switzerland
Watch: yourself
Posts: 1,256
|
Now let’s see a deep sea! The largest Rolex with this caliber would look even more strange.
At least Rolex has the good taste to hide this, unlike Patek who proudly presents undersized calibers with exhibition caseback. |
14 January 2022, 08:38 AM | #32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,703
|
Thanks for the photo. While off topic, your photo raises more questions than answers. Namely, why the absurdly uncomfortable bulbous caseback on the SD43? Clearly the movement is sufficiently recessed/flat to accommodate a flatter caseback…
If anyone from Rolex is reading, ditch that caseback and I will rebuy a SD43 tomorrow
__________________
♛ 116689 ♛ 116500LN Blk ♛ 116500LN Wht ♛ Sky Dweller 326934-003 ♛ 126710BLNR ♛ 126710BLRO - ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16520 ♛ 16523 ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1A-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Fiddy 127, Bronzo 671, 687, 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Daniel Roth Endurer Chronosprint, Cartier Santos XL - ✿ Tudor Black Bay 58 Bronze M79012M, Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41 |
14 January 2022, 08:39 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
The 3187 caliber would fit snug as the SD43 case is the exact size as the 216570 Ref.
|
15 January 2022, 04:21 PM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,070
|
Rolex Back To Using Case Clamp Tabs On Their Movements?
|
15 January 2022, 08:20 PM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Home
Watch: Patek Aquanaut
Posts: 837
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.