![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,032 | 70.01% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
61 | 4.14% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
381 | 25.85% |
Voters: 1474. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: .
Posts: 2,782
|
Your new 3285 also exhibits a poor isochronism. As a final measurement (after approximately 1-2 months), I recommend to perform again a series of measurements at 0, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours to ascertain whether the isochronism has undergone any changes. You probably already thought of that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (1 members and 5 guests) | |
sheldonsmith |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.