![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1,039 | 69.83% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
61 | 4.10% |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
388 | 26.08% |
Voters: 1488. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Sesame Street
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
1. Regardless of what this thread has become about, an even smaller fraction of people measure the amplitude of their watches; it simply doesn't matter (which is why it's only an internal metric of performance, not an advertised one). 2. One must wear the watch, not keep it in a safe, to notice. 3. The watch must be worn regularly. Those who wear them sporadically or rotate watches frequently (w/o using a winder) will never experience enough time loss to notice. 4. The watch must remain un-reset over similarly long periods, so frequent travelers (not using a GMT function) are unlikely to experience enough time loss to notice. 5. One must use their watch for time-telling, vs. referring to their phone despite having said watch on their wrist, to notice. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 14 (0 members and 14 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.