ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 September 2024, 06:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 34
|
Realistic water resistance at depth. Exp 2.
I have no qualms about swimming with my exp2 and it rarely left my wrist this summer. I have full confidence in it's water resistance when messing around in the sea.
I'm planning on diving with it in a couple of weeks for the simple reason I'd prefer to have it on me than leave it ashore in a dive bag. It won't be used for timekeeping as I'll have a couple of dive computers. I rarely exceed 40m / 130ft and never go beyond 150ft. I know it's not a sub but is this a reasonable proposition? I've had watches in the past with a nominal 50m rating but with the practical water resistance of a cardboard box. Hopefully rolex are different. The watch is around 3 years old and as I'm sure you're aware has a 100m rating. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.