ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Does your 32xx movement seem to be 100% ok? | |||
Yes, no issues | 1,046 | 69.83% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) but timekeeping is still fine | 62 | 4.14% | |
No, amplitude is low (below 200) and timekeeping is off (>5 s/d) | 390 | 26.03% | |
Voters: 1498. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Today, 01:01 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Sesame Street
Posts: 90
|
What's amazing, to me, is how little timekeeping deviation there is for DU positions across time intervals. I knew it would typically be one of the two fastest, but didn't realize it could maintain consistency so much better than others.
I don't have a timegrapher, so I tried a different experiment w/my 3230 (that averages about -3.8/d): Fully wound it and rested it 3U. Will take some measurements and see what happens. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 23 (1 members and 22 guests) | |
LNGSD43 |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.