The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 April 2021, 07:40 AM   #61
GGGMT
2024 Pledge Member
 
GGGMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Itinerant
Watch: 79010sg
Posts: 8,283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
The Explorer has been bling-free, SS-only since it came out in the 1950s. Now it's succumbed. Will be an unpopular move, but the SS return to 36mm makes up for it.

This


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
GGGMT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 08:36 AM   #62
polaris72
2024 Pledge Member
 
polaris72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: U.S./Vienna, AT
Posts: 1,967
My prediction is that TT will move like hot cakes.
polaris72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 08:38 AM   #63
Prism
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Geneva, CH
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alcibiades View Post
I like it - adds some elegance to the watch. Would have preferred in 39mm, but whatever. Hopefully demand is low so I can at least examine one at my AD
Bling bling, that’s what.
Prism is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 08:44 AM   #64
Rado63
"TRF" Member
 
Rado63's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Alan
Location: Northern, CA
Watch: 116334
Posts: 2,215
Take that TT Explorer and add that new green leaf dial and diamond 3,6,9 and winner, winner chicken dinner. Yes someone said ladies watch, but I think the 36mm is just a way to get watches that can work for both men and women.
__________________
Rolex 116334 126600 228235
Rado63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 08:58 AM   #65
GradyPhilpott
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Tudor BB36
Posts: 34,419
There's nothing wrong with the TT Explorer.

Those who like it will buy it and those who don't like it won't.

See? No problem at all.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 08:58 AM   #66
Lew Archer
"TRF" Member
 
Lew Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: L.A., Calif.
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 2,220
As I said in another thread, I’m delighted to see the return of the 36mm stainless Explorer. A classic’s classic.

If a diver’s watch, a race car driver’s chronograph, a pilot’s watch, a yacht racer’s watch can be in two tone offerings, then so can an explorer’s watch. I won’t be buying one, but someone will. Obviously, the resurgence of interest in two tone is seen as a trend with “legs” and this was a chance to capitalize on that trend and offer something “new”, an iconic model never before offered in that configuration.

When the stainless model is obtainable only at inflated gray market prices, many buyers will say, “for that money it should have some gold”.
Lew Archer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 09:01 AM   #67
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
To me personally, TT Explorer is an abomination. For the wider market, 36mm really hurts they hype potential. The difference between a DD36 blinged and DD40 blinged gives you an idea of the demand for size. I personally love both sizes but after owning the 36, decided on the 39 for my seven incher.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 05:49 PM   #68
SS Oyster
2024 Pledge Member
 
SS Oyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,057
It’s horrific ... worse that TT SD43!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SS Oyster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 06:06 PM   #69
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: SEIKO TUNA
Posts: 28,624
This one was only 34mm
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2008_HGK_02627_3554_000(045405).jpg (167.2 KB, 128 views)
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 06:36 PM   #70
Brew
"TRF" Member
 
Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
It's like watching a birthday party attended by spoiled brats who demand a different flavored icing for "their" cake.
Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 08:00 PM   #71
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
This one was only 34mm
OMG they ruined it years ago! I hope everybody now feels better about the new TT.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 08:56 PM   #72
Rohela1122
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1
Shoot me, but I love it!

I like it. It reminds me of my TT 36mm Datejust with the Jubilee bracelet that stretched within ten years. This one won’t. At 36mm I could wear it for dress and casual occasions. And The Oyster TT band looks better than the Jubilee.

It is more subdued than only gold. It says “I choose to be this subdued.” Yes, subdued. In my industry the mid levels have gold Rolexes, and the higher levels have AP and PT. And the highest levels have the custom watches. The problem with those watches is they alienate the workers, many of whom wear SS Rolex. So I have been looking for something that lets me move between worlds.

In the East this fits many of the managers who get pushback when they wear obviously high end watches (not saying that Rolex is low end, but this is certainly not the high end of the Rolex line.)

I realize that liking this watch will not be popular, but I think is a very carefully thought out niche product designed for someone who is buying utility and looks, and needs to appeal to a wide audience. It responds nicely to the TT Omega CONSTELLATIONs that have been popular.

So as a business owner who does not care what others think, i will probably purchase one of these.

And is it. “Ladylike?” In a decade of wearing the 36 TT Datejust no one even hinted that it looked ladylike. My wrist is 7.25”, not tiny.

However, my wife does not want me to give up my SS. I think the SS craze will fade, all marketing trends run in cycles. The recent movement to rubber straps, even within Rolex, show that is is happening. Look at the Sky Dweller. Look at rubber strapped watches in PT and VC.
Rohela1122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 09:00 PM   #73
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,552
I thought about this overnight and have yet to come up with a single explanation for what's RIGHT about this release. Can't come up with a single positive.

Just a God awful release for so many reasons. Two Tone on a fucking Explorer??? WTF were they thinking. This may actually be even WORSE than adding a TT Sea Dweller.

Then they eliminate the 39mm version on top of it? Only thing I can come up with is they are going for the women's market with this release. But there are so many other references they could have done this with.

And the marketing crap of people scaling Mt Everest. Yeah a two tone bling machine is the exact watch any normal climber would pick to wear for that journey. Yep, sure makes sense!

Ugghhh disgusted with this release and just about everything Rolex did this year. But this Exp I TT absolutely takes the cake
samson66 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 09:11 PM   #74
Jari from Finland
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 387
I think

that when there are people on watch forums writing about disliking
36 mm TT Exp doesn't mean that those who don't read watch forums wouldn't like it.
__________________
"I am interested in watches,
that's why I like them."
Jari from Finland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 09:17 PM   #75
garyk
2024 Pledge Member
 
garyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,504
It’s like a lot of cars, a butt for every seat. I’m sure it will sell well...and face it chaps, most explorer wearers are scaling the elevator or escalator at work not Mt Everest...
__________________
garyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 09:26 PM   #76
David001
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 538
It will sell well in Asia and that's who their target market is.

But you have to laugh, a 36mm TT spelunking watch, lol.
David001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 09:28 PM   #77
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
I thought about this overnight and have yet to come up with a single explanation for what's RIGHT about this release. Can't come up with a single positive.

Just a God awful release for so many reasons. Two Tone on a fucking Explorer??? WTF were they thinking. This may actually be even WORSE than adding a TT Sea Dweller.

Then they eliminate the 39mm version on top of it? Only thing I can come up with is they are going for the women's market with this release. But there are so many other references they could have done this with.

And the marketing crap of people scaling Mt Everest. Yeah a two tone bling machine is the exact watch any normal climber would pick to wear for that journey. Yep, sure makes sense!

Ugghhh disgusted with this release and just about everything Rolex did this year. But this Exp I TT absolutely takes the cake
Google Submariner Serti dial. That will blow your mind.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 09:32 PM   #78
Unclebuck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 74
A nice women's watch.
Unclebuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 10:29 PM   #79
FORTN
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: US
Posts: 120
36mm and S&G feinted everyone's expectaton.
FORTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 10:33 PM   #80
Tone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: London
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
I thought about this overnight and have yet to come up with a single explanation for what's RIGHT about this release. Can't come up with a single positive.

Just a God awful release for so many reasons. Two Tone on a fucking Explorer??? WTF were they thinking. This may actually be even WORSE than adding a TT Sea Dweller.

Then they eliminate the 39mm version on top of it? Only thing I can come up with is they are going for the women's market with this release. But there are so many other references they could have done this with.

And the marketing crap of people scaling Mt Everest. Yeah a two tone bling machine is the exact watch any normal climber would pick to wear for that journey. Yep, sure makes sense!

Ugghhh disgusted with this release and just about everything Rolex did this year. But this Exp I TT absolutely takes the cake
Well said
Tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 10:49 PM   #81
Fleetlord
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fleetlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vain
Posts: 5,996
Looks like a longines

https://www.jomashop.com/longines-wa...SABEgLjIvD_BwE
Fleetlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 11:13 PM   #82
richydave99
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Posts: 125
Absolutely nothing wrong with it, looks good to me too.
richydave99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 11:53 PM   #83
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unclebuck View Post
A nice women's watch.
Increase the diameter with 9% to get a regular Alfa male watch, amirite?
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 April 2021, 11:57 PM   #84
SaddleSC
"TRF" Member
 
SaddleSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
I thought about this overnight and have yet to come up with a single explanation for what's RIGHT about this release. Can't come up with a single positive.

Just a God awful release for so many reasons. Two Tone on a fucking Explorer??? WTF were they thinking. This may actually be even WORSE than adding a TT Sea Dweller.

Then they eliminate the 39mm version on top of it? Only thing I can come up with is they are going for the women's market with this release. But there are so many other references they could have done this with.

And the marketing crap of people scaling Mt Everest. Yeah a two tone bling machine is the exact watch any normal climber would pick to wear for that journey. Yep, sure makes sense!

Ugghhh disgusted with this release and just about everything Rolex did this year. But this Exp I TT absolutely takes the cake
I couldn't have said it better myself.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB
SaddleSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.