ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 July 2024, 11:38 PM | #91 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Real Name: Nadeem
Location: Chicago
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 967
|
I think I'm chasing and most likely need to pause and let the watch come to me. Otherwise I'll likely make a poor decision.
|
5 July 2024, 11:39 PM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2023
Real Name: Nadeem
Location: Chicago
Watch: GMT BLNR
Posts: 967
|
|
6 July 2024, 02:50 AM | #93 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
Just got the 36 14270 today.
It's a 2000 and pretty sure its never been worn. I have 6.8 in wrists and most of my watches are around 40 mm but I wanted the classic look the Exp is known for. It's not sized yet but Ive had it on about an hour and am glad I went 36. Here is a lousy pic I just snapped
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
6 July 2024, 03:12 AM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: EU
Posts: 50
|
36 all day every day. If you need a bigger no date watch, I’d go with the Sub.
|
6 July 2024, 08:14 AM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: CO
Watch: Explorer 1 224270
Posts: 69
|
Try and do whatever sings to you more. You will notice a lot of enthusiasts gravitate to the "classic" 36mm size. Do not let that sway your opinion. Which do you like more? I am not bashing the 36, its a beautiful watch. However, so is the 40. It seems to catch some hate on here for the size. Its an excellent watch. You could rock either.
|
6 July 2024, 09:48 AM | #96 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Traffic
Watch: DW-5600BB
Posts: 2,871
|
36mm.
|
6 July 2024, 09:07 PM | #97 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Sweden
Posts: 132
|
I bought the 36 with all the arguments regarding history, 36 being a mens size some decades ago etc. The thing is - you can build your universe around these history-inputs and be happy. My not so watch interested family and friends - different story. Too small, why are you wearing that instead of your other watches. I can live with that, but these illustrates two different perspectives.
If I choose a watch for my own personal style - not the 36. As a watch-entusiast-thing - sure. |
6 July 2024, 09:08 PM | #98 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,350
|
36, it's the classic size and looks right.
|
7 July 2024, 01:59 AM | #99 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Canada
Posts: 24
|
Honestly both look like they could work on your wrist.. But you have the wrist size to support a larger watch so I would so 40mm is the slight winner. Coming from the GMT, 36m may be quite underwhelming, but it'll provide a much different feel/aesthetic (which is the point, lol).
|
7 July 2024, 07:10 PM | #100 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: US
Posts: 688
|
36 for sure - can't beat the classic!
|
8 July 2024, 01:20 AM | #101 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 180
|
Quote:
|
|
8 July 2024, 01:44 AM | #102 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,269
|
I’d choose 40. If you initially found the 36 to be small, you may always feel that way.
|
17 July 2024, 05:02 AM | #103 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: U.S. East Coast
Posts: 174
|
I'd be in the 40mm camp, but I have a strong preference for 38-40mm cases on round timepieces as a whole, even for formal wear.
|
17 July 2024, 07:43 AM | #104 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 4
|
I own and wear a 36. I think it's the perfect size, but then I'm probably a bit unusual in this forum in that I don't really like big, heavy, clunky watches.
|
17 July 2024, 08:05 AM | #105 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
I know a few have mentioned the 39mm 214270 - but honestly, have you had a good look at it as an option? I know its not fresh from the AD, but its slightly smaller than the 40mm, with a different dial that makes use of the negative space. Worth a look.
|
17 July 2024, 08:21 AM | #106 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Traffic
Watch: DW-5600BB
Posts: 2,871
|
|
17 July 2024, 08:33 AM | #107 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,012
|
Quote:
If you choose the 40 over the 36, you WILL make a poor decision. The 36 is the classic size for the Explorer, and has a much more balanced appearance. It just looks better, on everyone. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
17 July 2024, 09:17 AM | #108 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: CO
Watch: Explorer 1 224270
Posts: 69
|
I respectfully disagree - thats a strong way to put it. 95% of the people out there cant spot the difference between the 36 v 40 on a larger wrist that supports the 40 case size. I never got the "proportions" argument.
|
17 July 2024, 09:39 AM | #109 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: USA
Watch: RolexPatekCartier
Posts: 2,366
|
I wear all sizes. But this model in 40mm better imho
__________________
PP5167a; PP5153r; PPNautilus 7118r; PP3733-YG; DD40 RG/Sundust-Roman;DD40YG/White/Roman;DD40 WG/Olive;Daytona RG;Sub Black YG; Daytona Panda; Celebration 41; GMT-II’s: Left VTNR; GRNR; Batman; SkyDweller SSJubilee/Black; SUB no-date; Oysterquartz SS; DJ SS 36mm’87; Cartier: Roadster YG;Santos YG; Panther YG; Panther SS; Tank’73 YG, Tank must 2023 ;Tank Americaine YG;BulgariBB38mm/YG |
17 July 2024, 11:40 AM | #110 | |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,012
|
Quote:
If a big guy has a very large wrist, maybe 8 1/2 inches, he should probably get the 40. For me, it’s a no brainer. Having seen both and tried them both on, I did note an aesthetic difference. The 36’s dial has a more appealing look. It is better balanced, because it has less empty real estate. This is only my own opinion, and yes I do have strong ones. Sorry, if that offends you. Cheers! Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
18 July 2024, 04:49 AM | #111 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
OK its been a few days now since I got the 36
As I said 40 is usually my sweet spot, I have a older 36 mm DJ which I NEVER wear as it feels too light and looks small so that's why I had such a hard time deciding what size to get the Exp in well I have to tell you I love the 36 mm Exp (14270) it just is comfortable, easy to read and is about the perfect watch for anything. If you have wrists bigger the 7.5 in I understand going 40 but if you have smaller wrists give the 36 a shot! If I could only have one and it had to be a SS watch Id have a hard time deciding between a ND sub or the 36 mm Exp
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
19 July 2024, 05:41 AM | #112 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: NJ
Watch: 224270 Exp I 40mm
Posts: 246
|
as a new owner of the 40mm.....the only advice I can give to the OP is go to the AD and wear both......yes, the 36mm is the classic size, but for me, the 40mm is perfect (7.25" wrist)....keep in mind that the size descriptions are deceptive....dimensionally they are smaller, so keep that in mind.....good luck with your choice....
__________________
♛ Explorer 224270 Ω Moonwatch 3861 Sapphire 🛡️ Black Bay Pro m79470-0001 |
20 July 2024, 09:51 AM | #113 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,773
|
Quote:
The first picture is more representative of how it actually wears on you, and in that picture (seeing as you asked), its too small IMO. From memory the current 36mm Exp is more like 35mm The Air King looks great on you.
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
20 July 2024, 10:13 AM | #114 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,773
|
Quote:
Quote:
If you downsize the 40mm to the same size as the 36 in image editing software, the proportions are pretty much identical. Dial proportionality is almost the same too, as the 40 has larger text, hour markers and hands. The whole "theres too much unused space on the 40's dial" doesn't really stack up because proportionally its almost identical to the 36. Its just larger overall. In isolation, on a plain background it would be extremely difficult to tell them apart
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
||
20 July 2024, 10:49 AM | #115 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,969
|
40
__________________
RRGHOST1 |
20 July 2024, 11:17 AM | #116 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,195
|
My wrists are just under 7". I like the look of the 40 mm Explorer over the 36 mm on my wrist. Interestingly, I like the way a 36 mm Day-Date looks on my wrist over the 40 mm Day-Date.
Try both on and don't over think things. Get what you think looks best and you'll be more likely to be happier with your purchase.
__________________
t65tampa |
20 July 2024, 11:26 AM | #117 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: NC
Posts: 377
|
This may have already been mentioned, but for me, overall body build is also important, including height. I'm 6'3", 200 lbs in good shape. I owned a TT Explorer 36 and loved it. However, my wife (and I) felt the watch looked too small on me after owning it for several months, though my wrists are 7.25". Currently, my smallest watch is 40mm. These considerations are not important to everyone, but they were for me and my wife who has to watch me wear them. Again, not everyone will consider this point important and that's fine, too. Just wanted share an additional viewpoint from first hand experience.
The only important decision here is the one you make. You did mention that initially you thought the 36 was too small IIRC. Another poster felt you would always think that and I tend to agree with that sentiment. But, it could always grow on you. The Explorer series is iconic. I wish you well.
__________________
♛Explorer II 16570 | ♛Submariner 14060M | ♛SDDS 116660 | ♛GMT Master II 126710BLRO | ♛Daytona 116503 |
20 July 2024, 01:44 PM | #118 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Canada
Posts: 74
|
I purchased the 40mm, the 36 just feels way under sized. Wrist for refrence is 6.5" maybe a tidbit larger. I think it looks and feels great! My 41mm Op definitely wears a smidgen larger, for those wondering. The Explorer does wear nicer! Image with the long sleeven is the 36mm. I know these type of photos can be deceiving but when in the flesh it's a no Brainer.
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk |
20 July 2024, 05:03 PM | #119 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: .
Posts: 367
|
Both 36mm & 40mm are great it just comes down to personal preference, some purists will always say 36mm because this is how they preceive this watch should be based on history.
The sub which is the most iconic watch was orginally a 39mm then 40mm and now 41mm, but majority seems happy with current iteration for being better proportioned than previous gen despite being larger. I opted for 40mm Explorer because the 36mm looks too small on my 7 inch wrist especially the bracelet which I was not comfortable with, the 40mm on the other hand, wears smaller than the previous 39mm generation and the dial is only 2.5mm bigger than the current 36mm. On top of that, the case thickness and the bracelet are better proportioned than the 36mm. Also the new texting, by placing the explorer wording on the top looks better and less crowded on the larger dial. In the end my advice would be to buy what you like and you are comfortable with and not what others think, it is your money, your watch. |
21 July 2024, 04:49 AM | #120 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 127
|
I've 6.5" wrists with reasonable definition on my arms - having now had the chance to try 36 and 40 back to back, the 36mm is my preference. Thats to say, just this watch, not across the board - IMO 36mm, suits this watch best.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.