The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Patek Philippe Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 September 2024, 04:38 PM   #1
WatchYoSelf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: CO
Posts: 87
Any chance Patek will announce a 36mm or 37mm Calatrava at Watches and Wonders in 202

The current Calatrava watches are too large imo.
WatchYoSelf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2024, 04:40 PM   #2
WatchYoSelf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: CO
Posts: 87
*2025
WatchYoSelf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2024, 08:06 PM   #3
Vasco
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 667
Well, this is really not the trend, I doubt it.

Aside of Patek, when the watches got much larger in the 2012-2016 period (42 to even 45-46), we saw a reversal afterwards, with sometimes 2 size propositions (e.g. the Royal Oak).

Patek didn't go that route, they took maybe +1mm on many references over a 10-year period instead (maybe 2mm maximum for the smaller references).

However, with Patek, it depends on the demand. If many collectors ask for a smaller watch, Patek will certainly consider it. If not, I don't think they will.
Vasco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2024, 08:14 PM   #4
iginut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2023
Location: UK
Posts: 23
If they do I'll be first in the queue
iginut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:07 AM   #5
MRBolton
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: USA
Watch: ing my wrist
Posts: 1,205
Agree that they need to do this. The current size base Calatrava is way too big to that point that it looks a bit awkward. I've tried it on a couple times and wonder whom they're making it for. My wrist is a little over 7" inches, which I feel like is a normal size, and it just looks cheap to me because of the proportions. It could be a Fossil watch to my eyes.
MRBolton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:52 AM   #6
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,932
It would be a surprise to see a 38mm Calatrava using the new 30‑255 PS based on the size of the new movement.

I'm patiently waiting to see what they do with the new Platinum Calatrava which I'm sure will use the 30‑255 PS - I'll take it from there; expecting this next Spring. Looking forward to it.
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:13 AM   #7
WatchYoSelf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: CO
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasco View Post
Well, this is really not the trend, I doubt it.

Aside of Patek, when the watches got much larger in the 2012-2016 period (42 to even 45-46), we saw a reversal afterwards, with sometimes 2 size propositions (e.g. the Royal Oak).

Patek didn't go that route, they took maybe +1mm on many references over a 10-year period instead (maybe 2mm maximum for the smaller references).

However, with Patek, it depends on the demand. If many collectors ask for a smaller watch, Patek will certainly consider it. If not, I don't think they will.

No, it is the trend. And it has been for a couple years now. Men are even wearing 34mm and smaller women’s watches. Please refer to the articles below.

https://www.gq.com/story/the-weeknd-ladies-watches

https://www.mrporter.com/en-us/journ...bunny-17489916

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/08/f...y-matters.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/men-wea...mille-7f0ecceb

https://amp.scmp.com/magazines/style...lippe-timothee

https://www.gq.com/story/timothee-ch...rtier-panthere
WatchYoSelf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:16 AM   #8
WatchYoSelf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: CO
Posts: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by bp1000 View Post
It would be a surprise to see a 38mm Calatrava using the new 30‑255 PS based on the size of the new movement.

I'm patiently waiting to see what they do with the new Platinum Calatrava which I'm sure will use the 30‑255 PS - I'll take it from there; expecting this next Spring. Looking forward to it.

Did Patek mention they’re working on a new platinum Calatrava? I haven’t heard about that.
WatchYoSelf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:28 AM   #9
Ichiran
2024 Pledge Member
 
Ichiran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Michael
Location: Dotonbori
Watch: Mostly blue dials
Posts: 7,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vasco View Post
Well, this is really not the trend, I doubt it.

Patek didn't go that route, they took maybe +1mm on many references over a 10-year period instead (maybe 2mm maximum for the smaller references).
+1
No way Patek is going back to small watches. 40mm is the new small for them.
Ichiran is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:06 AM   #10
dchang81
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 2,127
Not sure why this is considered out of the realm of possibility when they just had the Tokyo 6127 in 36mm for men and 7127 in 31mm for women
dchang81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 07:33 PM   #11
Goose 104
"TRF" Member
 
Goose 104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Watch: 126622
Posts: 918
I really hope they do. A new 5196p would be most welcome!
__________________
♛126622 Rhodium // ♛126234 Blue //♛126613LB // ♛126000 Green + more ♛
76213 Prince Date+Day // Black Bay 58 // Black Bay Harrods // Heritage Advisor // Vertex M100 + more...
Goose 104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 08:12 PM   #12
ts3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,410
Not a manual one.

Cannot imagine the 215 movement back in regular production and can't see them developing a new manual movement after having launched the last one just a few years ago. And that one appears too large for 36mm or 37mm.
ts3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:04 PM   #13
JMac6
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2021
Location: USA
Posts: 197
I think 39mm is just about as small as Patek can go with the new hand wound base caliber or the newish micro rotor. I think we are in for 39mm+ for a while.

Also, while small watches are trendy, the bulk of watch buyers are purchasing 40mm+ watches.

I wish that we could return to slightly more reasonably sized watches. I think 34-38mm is probably the right size for a dress watch for most guys. I have a 7” wrist and most Patek dress watches don’t slip under my cuff that easily.
JMac6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (4 members and 1 guests)
Sapper801 , pessoa00 , Andy Mcpandy , w220
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.