![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 52
|
SD or 50 Anniversary SS GMTII?
First post. Awesome forum. I am set to purchase my 2nd Rolex, my 1st one a mid-90s GMTII which I have since sold. I was dead set on the SD mainly because of its rugged appeal and clean look, but after reading here about the new anniversary SS GMTII and the handsome pics i'm now undecided between the two. My local AD has the SD on stock and tells me he will have the new GMT in two months. Either is being offered to me at more or less same price of around $4,500.
I'm not sure whether to wait for the GMTII arrival so I can try them both side-by-side and decide which one i'll prefer. Or just get the SD now as i'm itching. Is this anniversary SS GMTII worth the wait? No fit issues with the SD as I have tried it and fits the wrist just fine. Also function of either tool watch is irrelevant to me as i'm neither a diver and although I travel frequently across timezones never found the need to use the timezone feature with my old GMT. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
|
Seadweller!
![]() ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
|
4500 USD for the SS gmt???? I doubt it. If this is true just buy it and then sell it for 5900 and buy the SD
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
|
Welcome to TRF.
Tough choices....I had a SD and I have the TT GMT II Anniv. Hands down I think the new GMT is amazing...... However you should try them on side by side and see which one "smiles back" at you. You will know then what your choice will be. Good luck and have fun. ![]()
__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,723
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,346
|
Welcome.
The GMT is a much more versatile time piece than the SD, unless you deep dive routinely. Having said that, purchasing a Rolex is generally an emotional issue rather than a technical one. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 576
|
Welcome Kabayan!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
|
Quote:
I have the SD, I would have to look at the new GMT II to make my decision. I also have the "old" GMT II 16710 Z series, and yes, the GMT is more versatile since it has the 2 time zones, the SD is a rugged watch that in my opinion, from bracelet link thickness to crystal to case is a Bradley fighting vehicle of a watch with a high end exterior polish and shine not normally seen on such a beast.... ![]() You need to see them both side by side. Take your time, go home after looking, think about it and come back to buy the one you couldn't stop thinking about.... Best of luck, Chris |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Nick
Location: Texas
Watch: SS GMT II
Posts: 88
|
Get the GMT at that price!!! Then flip it and with the money made, buy another GMT. GMT all the way. You won't be dissapointed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Real Name: Adrian
Location: Bolton, UK.
Watch: Daytona 116520
Posts: 6,844
|
I'd get the SD because I've got the TT GMT. Welcome to TRF.
![]()
__________________
A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.........Segal's Law Member #10 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Arturo
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: Black GMT ll
Posts: 1,271
|
I think he has misinformed you about the price of the GMT. That is the kind of discount that could get him in trouble with Rolex, especially with that new watch. Why on earth would he sell it for that kind of discount? Does not make sense.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
I'd get the GMT because I've got the SD.
![]() Seriously, I wasn't too impressed with photos of the GMT, but having tried on the TT GMT, whoa. It feels completely different, and I'm definitely looking at getting one when the circumstances are right. The other guys are right, though - the quoted price is way too low.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Robert
Location: Angelus Oaks, CA
Watch: 116713
Posts: 6,828
|
I got the GMT. Then I tried to trade for the SD. Now I am so glad I still have the GMT!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Michael
Location: Singapore
Watch: The Crown
Posts: 17
|
at that price,w/o hesitation i'll get the GMT if i were given the choice.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
Quote:
Hey Mic, I thought you had already sold your 116710. I notice it up for sale elsewhere.
__________________
..33 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: norcal
Posts: 3,031
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
Welcome Dnnaudio! Welcome to TRF!
Kamusta ka! Tagasaan ka? Ang mura and presyo ng GMT II... baka mali ang pag sabi ng AD! If the price is the same for both SD and GMT II anniversary, I'd go with the GMT II anniversary. GrandDaddy, You originally from the Phil as well?
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
If, however, that is the take away price, then I'd wait for it. JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! ![]() I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Ruben
Location: Orange County
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,317
|
As most have said, it's a matter of fit and personal preference.
Personally, I find the SD to be a bit heavy, large and uncomfortable. I have pretty large wrists but it still consistently feels "high-centered." ![]() ![]() I'd definitely go back to your AD and make sure the pricing on that anniv GMT-II...that's more like CURRENT GMT-II discounted pricing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 52
|
Thanks guys. I guess the AD could be wrong with the GMTII price. In that case it removes the GMT as a choice since i'm only willing to spend $4.5T at the moment. That makes the SD an easy pick. The AD is in Jakarta, Indonesia where I am based at the moment and Rolexes in this neck of the woods do not sell very easily so the price could be true.
If the AD confirms the pricing I am inclined to follow most of your suggestion to wait for the GMT's arrival before I decide. BTW mabuhay to my kabayans here in the forum. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Sea-Dweller,if you are man enough ....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 52
|
A bit more of these type of posts and i'll end up prematurely pulling the trigger on the SD. I've seen it at the AD and real looks good on my wrist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
I'll help nudge you a bit further Dnnaudio
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Louie
Location: California
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 644
|
Me, Too!
Quote:
Me, too. Pinoy din ako. It's nice to know that I have compatriots in this forum. Ang akala ko nag-iisa lang ako. ![]() Dnnaudio: I have both an SD and GMT II. It would be nice, isn't it if you can buy both? Many moons ago, I sold my first GMT, I had kicked myself on the butt since. Naturally, when I bought back to Rolex, my first choice was the GMT II. Based on the raving reviews I have had read, I bought the SD next--without the "Mrs." knowing. ![]() The SD from my experience is a substantial watch--heavy and tall on the wrist. While the GMT II master is lighter and sits nicely on the wrist. I get more compliments wearing it, due perhaps to its black and red bezel. IMHO, the SD is a (more) beautiful watch than the GMT II. If you ONLY have to buy one, my advice is to get the SD. All the best, Louie |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,887
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() You never buy a Rolex prematurely or impulsively.You only buy when you are 105 certain. Just as a bit more incentive,I would just like to mention, that I am wearing mine,right now ... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SEA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 87
|
Get the SD. Its a great watch.
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Philippines
Posts: 52
|
Well you guys were right on the new GMT pricing error. Apparently my AD has no idea on the MSRP yet and just assumed it will more or less be the same price as the current GMTII. As a reference I asked him the discounted price of the anniversary green Sub and he gave me $6T. So correct me if i'm wrong the new SS GMTII will probably fall in that same price range.
Great pics roadcarver, before I fall for the SD could you tell me if that elevated saphire glass is not prone to bumping and scratching. It seems so high-set and vulnerable. I'm going to use this as an everyday watch so this thing must be solid. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
|
I've had this watch since Jan of this year and have had no jarring of the crystal. I bought this SD pre-loved and the person that wore it really made use of the watch, and the crystal is still mint.
Quote:
__________________
I'm just a cook... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.