ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: If given the choice ... | |||
I like the value retention and positive brand attributes that scarcity brings. | 182 | 42.82% | |
I would prefer unlimited access to sports models. Second-hand market be damned. | 108 | 25.41% | |
I don’t really care either way. Value shmalue and I don’t get frustrated by unavailability. | 40 | 9.41% | |
This poll sucks. Bring on Basel, 2018. | 95 | 22.35% | |
Voters: 425. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10 March 2018, 10:35 PM | #91 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Home!
Posts: 3,307
|
|
10 March 2018, 10:53 PM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: your attitude
Posts: 135
|
Rolex is doing a great job at protecting the brand. This forum is a good confirmation of that, a Rolex watch is so much more than just a watch to many here, due to the excellent marketing strategy.
Significantly rising the price of SS models would make people look elsewhere, making people wait is less outrageous. Either way, expensive (or hard to get) are essential attributes of any luxury item. And those who don't care about exclusivity or value retention and focus on functionality instead buy apple watches anyway ;-) |
10 March 2018, 11:59 PM | #93 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
once the markets go down you are gonna see a reverse. dont complain.
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.