![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,378
|
When Will We HAVE To Go Aftermarket..
With all the new offerings coming out of Rolex lately..
The new GMT ceramic, the latest Sub Ceramic...The SD ceramic.. The announced discontinuation or phase-out of 15xx parts and repair.... It seems like it is just a matter of time before Rolex won't be supporting movements and bezel inserts........Possibly even acrylic crystals.. At what point do we have to go aftermarket for our parts....... ?? Will the quality of aftermarkets meet OEM... ??
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,024
|
It's a real shame Rolex doesn't value it's vintage pieces.
![]() ![]() ![]() dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band ![]() Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation ![]() The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Ιt will have an effect on the profit that rolex is making in many ways
As i have said many times it is not cost effective for a business to have two separate manufacturing technologies Rolex is refreshing it's manufacturing procedures and equipment it is very expensive in the beginning but in the long term you are experiencing profit due to the economies of scale as all of it's watches are manufactured under the same technology + they will not have to produce extra parts since ceramic bezels can take a lot of punishment. From a business perspective this is what rolex is doing From a marketing point of view they are trying to facelift all of their watches without destroying that much the classic design which is their trademark and that's what other manufacturers are doing too so rolex has to change some things or else competitors will have a bigger slice of the market. Last but not least rolex is trying to re-establish itself as a luxury watch in the affluent market as many competitors like PP,VC, Ulysse nardin, jaeger are dominant there
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN Last edited by frostie; 13 July 2008 at 12:43 AM.. Reason: Add Info |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Jim Snyder
Location: Ohio
Watch: Ask me later.....
Posts: 7,716
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
"You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
|
Well put Velitsko, perhaps they will realise how much their heritage is worth one day.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best. f |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Quote:
![]() We are facing a transition period we just gotta get used to it ![]() In 20 years it will be like it never happened The interesting thing though is that they will have the chance to boost up sales as they will be able to offer old and new models at the same time until they empty their warehouses from the old models that they were producing. Old rolex fans will start buying the older models and new rolex fans like myself will buy the new stuff so this = Revenues for Rolex
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Velitsko, you make some excellent points.
![]() However; to chip in on Larry's original post and to echo Dan's statement, it is a crying shame Rolex is turning it's back on the very references that brought them to the place they are. ![]() As I've said before, in great measure the legacy that is Rolex has in some sense fallen to the collector to preserve. Thankfully parts for these common calibers exist and will continue to do so for some time. It is the factory support that is being curtailed. I'm one of the "nature abhors a vacuum" guys. At some point (and I think it's already begun) collectors will accept the work of select master watchmakers to service, and make, parts for these treasured pieces. Certainly originality will always reign supreme with some, but having a watch that runs is a lot better than one that doesn't. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Quote:
![]() Collectors will suffer a bit since as you mentioned they will have to find master watchmakers Too bad that rolex is turning it's back to their heritage but business is business i know that this sounds hard but that's how things are.
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
A shame it is. Patek will fix any watch it has manufactured in its 169 year history (yes, it has more of a "history" than Rolex) and replace and/or re-manufacture any part for your vintage piece. Perhaps this (and the fact that they are known for "jacking up" the bids on Antiquarium) explains why no Rolex has ever surpassed the value of the highest Patek.
Actually, if Rolex were to act a bit more like Patek (and other brands) in regards to their vintage pieces, they would increase their profits, not decrease them. Just my $0.02.
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Quote:
Patek is manufacturing 13,000 watches per year if i am not mistaken whereas rolex is manufacturing 800,000 watches a year and probably rolex is servicing 200,000 watches a year. Patek has the ability to produce vintage spare parts for their vintage watches since their production is not 24/7 like rolex whereas rolex doesn't have the time to produce any spare parts as they are on a non-stop production all the time since they have to cover the huge demand all around the world. So from a manufacturing perspective rolex is searching for a higher and faster automation of the manufacturing procedure. In other words it is impossible to produce spare parts for all of the watches that you've manufactured firstly when you have such a huge production schedule every year and secondly when there are variations on the movements since a 2006 rolex movement is a lot more different than a 1960 rolex movement All of their moves are completely justified It's all part of the game and the game for rolex is to be No.1
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, the watch business has changed - now, a watch company's present collection is valued by how they treat their earlier offerings. And Rolex is losing its image because of their refusal to treat their prior products with the reverance that they demand of their current line. Just my $0.02. Oh, and Patek releases about 35K or so watches per year currently, give or take.
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Quote:
They prefer to have 5.000 or 10.000 (don't exactly remember the number) employees and have such huge profits
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
Agreed. But I think it's a dumb business decision on their part, and I think it's de-valuing the brand. But that's just my opinion, and I've been catastrophically wrong about this kind of thing before.
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
|
Nicely put (the whole post) Wonder why they can't set up a vintage company like Omega have done
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
I don't know why maybe they don't feel threatened in the market or maybe there is no need since they sell all of their new watches
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ally
Location: Surrey (UK)
Watch: 15223
Posts: 638
|
I spoke to Rolex UK and they told me they would service and repair watches that were manufactured going back to the 1950's
Are US RSC refusing to servce older watches? I did not think there was a problem getting them to service these watches. AJF. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
RUSA still services 15xx movements subject to parts availability. (Though I've heard 1580 movements might be problematic). 10xx movements are a no go to my knowledge. One of problems here as opposed to our overseas friends is RUSA's forcing more and more hands and or dial changes. Additionally "Exotic" dials are an issue with RUSA. References like the 1680 RED, 1655, etc... raise issues even though the movement is the same as in other references. I had NY RSC service a 1680 WHITE with no problem yet I was refused service on a RED two weeks later with the explanation "We don't service those". Dallas RSC on the other hand had no problem with service on the RED. As I understand it now BH RSC is the best shot for these pieces, but at the lack of warranty. The two Independent Rolex service centers in Chicago and San Francisco offer a bit more leeway--so far, but who knows for how long. It's more a matter of doing your homework before hand...at least for now. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Mark
Location: U.K.
Watch: Too Many
Posts: 2,097
|
Personally I think Rolex as a company can serve both very well.
Sales are of course top priority, but machines punching out bezels for the older Subs, GMTs or movement parts for the 1500 series movements is not going to cost them anything in real terms especially labour, which is the most expensive part of any business operation. I don't think Rolex want to put themselves in the Luxury bracket either not entirely anyway, as they would need to down production and raise their prices considerably. Patek Philippes bottom line watch is around £6750 GBP while Rolex's is around £1800 GBP. They are not even close. Luxury is exclusive and expensive, Rolex are not exclusive and not expensive compared to some. They do of course have very expensive pieces, but you can pay £65000 GBP for a quartz Jacob and Co watch if it has enough diamonds on it, exclusive POS IMO, but some people love them (David Beckham you should be ashamed of yourself). Rolex could easily give their vintage watches good service back up, make good profits servicing them and selling parts without damaging their future sales, but they have yet to realise it. I have spent £2000 GBP in the past year with RSC Bexley, but they wouldn't have had a penny out of me if I wasn't having my existing watches serviced as I am not in the market for a new one. Just my tuppence worth ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SAN DIEGO, CA USA
Watch: me pass...
Posts: 1,111
|
Quote:
![]() I would hate to think that a watch could be considered "obsolete" after a certain point... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
|
Quote:
i don't know how they are doing it but the auto manufactures are getting out of having to supply parts for 10 years. i have a 1998 lincoln mark vlll and a 1999 oldsmobile aurora. there have been many parts unavailable on those 2 cars for 3 years now. 2 years ago i couldn't buy new fog lamp assy's for the olds and that is a high sale item due to front impacts. likewise on the lincoln, haven't been able to buy new hid headlight bulbs or capsules for 3 years now. there are lots of parts for those 2 cars unavailable now. they are doing something to get around that law. ![]()
__________________
cmr OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona, |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: rudolph
Location: chicago burbs
Posts: 2,026
|
i better get my 1575 to the rsc soon after reading this post.i might drop it off in dallas on my way home from colorado.
__________________
tt date circa 69' 5513 circa 81' ss sub w/date (z) pepsi gmt for dad(D) polar expy II(z) 1675 gmt circa 68' ladies datejust on jubilee for mom (z) sea dweller16600(M) SS Sub-C(g) Omega Planet Ocean,45.5 on mesh(2500D) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mililani, Oahu
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
So, some guy has a COMEX, he wants to wear it but Rolex does not service anymore. Replacement parts are available but not Rolex parts. What does a WIS do? 1) Keep the COMEX in a box-and like stamps- people can look at it? 2) Service and fit it with non-rolex parts knowing that the watch ain't pure? 3) Cannibalize other vintage to service the COMEX? Why can't Rolex set up (or outsource) a branch that's independent of current manufacturing which services only vintage/discontinued watches? Give all the old parts and machinery to that branch and they can do all the vintage/discontinued repairs, make/outsource parts.... This repair facility will still have the Rolex imprimatur and the value of these vintage will not be affected. Rolex may make money off of it too? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
This is what I don't get - Rolex hires more watchmakers, fixes its vintage watches and charges enough for that service to pay for the additional watchmakers it hired. How does this eat into their profits or reduce their productivity? I guess I just don't get it - can someone explain how repairing vintage watches hurts Rolex?
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 242
|
Quote:
With the new improved ceramic bezel, maxi dial models coming out now, are the above considered discontinued? Or does discontinued mean when a line is completely dropped not just modified? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
|
I read some time ago that Mercedes set up a facility in Southern California that will service any Mercedes vehicle, no matter how old. If a needed part is not available, they will manufacture one. I don't have any idea how much this costs the consumer. Undoubtedly a lot!!!
I don't know how this would go over for Rolex watches. If it's a money maker, then Rolex could do it. If Rolex doesn't think it will be a money maker, then they won't. I don't think Rolex is sentimental about its vintage watches. They just want to make the money.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves. Rolexers do it with perpetual movements. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: marcus
Location: us, oklahoma
Posts: 1,646
|
since i can't afford a comex sub or a drsd i have to stay with the newer stuff. i am 50 so i figure it like this, any rolex i buy will be able to be serviced as long as i am alive so i don't need to worry about it. even if i land a 10 year old yg day date i figure i am good to go.
![]()
__________________
cmr OA-Black dial SS Daytona, V-White dial SS Daytona, Z-GMT2C Wife, Z-Platinum Yacht Master, Black ceramic White dial SS Daytona, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.