ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 January 2018, 06:14 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 19
|
Problem with Chrono?
I just bought a new Speedy Professional Moonwatch from Jomashop and once I would it and checked the chronology function, I found something odd:
When the chronology second hand moves between 59 seconds and 1:00, the minute sub-dial advances to show 1min. So, If i stop the chronology at 59.3 or 59.5 seconds, the watch will register 1:59.5. Has anyone else seen/experienced this? It seems like it shouldn't be happening. I looked at a friend's speedy (different model) and his chronology behavior seemed normal. Thinking I should probably return it as defective? Thanks for any advice! -Evan |
26 January 2018, 10:27 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Here
Watch: SpeedyPro Explorer
Posts: 235
|
Congrats on your Speedmaster
Mine behaves like yours too. It doesn’t bother me, I use the chronograph function quite often...at least once a day... and for my use that doesn’t have any effect at all. |
27 January 2018, 01:28 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,353
|
This is normal. Your Speedmaster Professional with Caliber 1861 features a "jumping" minutes register, meaning that the minutes elapsed are advanced as you describe. The chronograph's elapsed time should be read as minutes registered on the chronograph's minutes sub-dial, plus seconds registered by the chronograph's central seconds hand.
|
27 January 2018, 05:50 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: The Sun
Posts: 232
|
Same experience here on my last speedmaster. From my research this seems to be quite typical on most speedies.
|
27 January 2018, 01:03 PM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: CT
Posts: 9,091
|
Mine does that as well, it's normal
|
29 January 2018, 11:34 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Real Name: Viktor
Location: New York
Watch: Broad Arrow
Posts: 98
|
Quote:
|
|
31 January 2018, 07:19 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
|
|
1 February 2018, 01:16 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,353
|
Watching mine, I guess it's possible the chronograph's minutes register advances a fraction of a second before the chronograph seconds hand passes top-dead-center. My sense is you could ask Omega to correct this, but their response may be to inform you that your watch is performing as designed.
As for the hand of the hours register not being centered, I suppose you could also ask them to correct this. It should be centered with the chronograph not running and reset to zero. Speedmasters produced prior to 1968 used Caliber 321, which was prone to having its hours register creep a tiny bit. Without switching the chronograph on, an owner may have observed the hours hand advancing a tiny distance over the course of, say, a month or so. If he pressed the button to reset the chronograph, he would see the hand on the hours register move a tiny distance back to top-dead-center. If you think your watch's hours register may be creeping like this, then use your watch without activating the chronograph for a couple of weeks, and observe the hand in the hours register to see if it seems to be advancing a tiny distance. If so, then you might ask Omega to correct that. I'm sure this is not a common problem with Caliber 1861 in the contemporary Speedmaster Professional, though. |
1 February 2018, 03:40 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
|
My 4030 Zenith Daytona has a little bit of creepiness with the 30 minute subdial hand, but it does snap. Both my Speedies snap pretty cleanly.
__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro |
1 February 2018, 03:46 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,502
|
Normal
|
1 February 2018, 11:05 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 19
|
Below is an image of the issue. seems off to me that it would have started advancing at 58sec and completed the tick to 1min at 59 sec as shown
IMG_5638.jpg |
1 February 2018, 08:32 PM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Tony
Location: Orchard Park, NY
Watch: Idiot Savant
Posts: 3,353
|
Quote:
|
|
10 February 2018, 02:57 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sub 16610
Posts: 19
|
Got it at Jomashop
|
12 February 2018, 07:57 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: CH
Posts: 14
|
Mine does it to. And it doesn’t bother me at all.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.