ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
24 June 2019, 12:23 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
Tudor 79190 questions
In doing some research on on the Tudor 79190 I've been able to find some interesting facts.
- appears it has more in common with the 1680 Submariner series than the 16610. I really like this over say my current 14060M due to the matte dial, painted indicies, and less "shine" than its Rolex cousin. Before I further down this rabbit hole I have a few questions: 1.) Would anyone have the dial differences / measurements compared to a 14060 and/or 16610? 2.) Is a 93150 or 78790 bracelet compatible with the head? 3.) With a proper service would a 90's watch in your opinion be up for water activities? |
24 June 2019, 12:44 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,609
|
Quote:
About a year ago I wore a 1601 that was older than I am at a depth of about 30-33 meters. It was last serviced by RSC in 2013. Coincidentally, it was also subjected to multiple temperature changes as the water was cool at about 60’F but air temps were in the 90s to 100s. The 1601 is no dive watch but it still works fine today. Your mileage may vary but I imagine a Tudor Sub would fare much better AOW |
|
24 June 2019, 12:50 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
I always loved the Tudor Submariner (with date). I was hoping to see it re-introduced at Basel this past show.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
24 June 2019, 12:51 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: CNY
Posts: 152
|
TGN related?
|
24 June 2019, 01:37 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
|
24 June 2019, 02:32 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
|
I can't say for sure if the newer bracelet would fit, but if I had to guess I'd say it will.
Also don't see any issue with a properly serviced watch from that era maintaining water resistance. |
24 June 2019, 04:04 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: United States
Posts: 2,410
|
Tudor 79190 questions
Don’t know the answer but awesome vintage watch that retain and appreciate in value over time. Find one with paper and box.
|
24 June 2019, 04:23 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
Thank you all for the input so far!
|
24 June 2019, 05:03 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
93150 fits. All dials age differently and there are multiple variants and service dials for each in circulation. You’ll be fine in the water. Case dimensions are very similar - the watches use the same crown.
|
24 June 2019, 08:23 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Tennessee
Watch: DW-5600
Posts: 1,584
|
|
24 June 2019, 11:34 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
So was I.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
24 June 2019, 01:16 PM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,007
|
I had a Tudor 94110 Snowflake, which I put in for service at the RSC and was offered both a Rolex and Tudor signed bracelet to replace the original, badly stretched bracelet. I chose the Tudor bracelet, but I daresay the Rolex signed bracelet would've been the 93150 (and it should equally fit a 79190).
A properly serviced and pressure tested 79190 would definitely be up for water activities. Good luck in your hunt! Those Tudor subs are fantastic. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.