![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 9,992
|
Adrian win! Stunner
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: USA
Watch: 15407ST
Posts: 959
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
Stunning! Can we please get more pics of your 26331OR's!!
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: California
Watch: PP,AP,Rolex,IWC
Posts: 578
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: somewhere
Posts: 350
|
Keep the 15400OR, wait for fully in house movement for the chrono. Then make the swap, u might get more for your current watch
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
How so? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: SG
Posts: 391
|
I would keep the 15400.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
Really?? Why would you suggest that? Give me a reason not to do it!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: SG
Posts: 391
|
The 15400 is a boutique edition. ROC subdials take away from the beautiful blue tapisserie dial. The position of the date window and a lack of an in-house movement would bother me. When I think of a royal oak a chronograph is not the first thing that comes to my mind.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
|
For the nominal increase to the ROC, I would consider it. Both are beautiful pieces. Value wise I think that is a good move (dollar for dollar).
However, it depends on personal preference. If you like the classic RO, it would defeat the purpose of trading it away just to get something that is worth more from a dollar standpoint. If your goal is a chrono, then its a no brainer for the ROC. What type of watch are you looking for (as the end goal)? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,357
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,290
|
Of these two, I'd do it.
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: Royal Oak Chrono
Posts: 301
|
Quote:
__________________
Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331OR Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15400OR Rolex Day-Date II 218235 Rolex GMT-Master II BLNR 116710 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Rolex, AP & Omega
Posts: 277
|
Go with the ROC.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Adrian
Location: USA
Watch: 15407ST
Posts: 959
|
I say do it!!!!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: somewhere
Posts: 350
|
It seems AP will start producing less Royal Oaks as of late 2018, your 15400 might have a higher price on the pre-owned market.
But i have to say the ROC is higher priced than the 15400 so if you do end up swapping, that's a hell of a good deal. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: US
Watch: FP Journe CB/ 5711
Posts: 345
|
No chance. With a blue dial, less is more. Keep it simple IMHO
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: DC
Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN
Posts: 1,015
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2019
Real Name: Nick
Location: USA
Posts: 15
|
I def would
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,433
|
Tough, but I think I like your watch more than the chrono.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: San Fran
Posts: 2,214
|
I am a sucker for Chronos..
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: toronto
Posts: 503
|
Without a doubt.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Jason
Location: Maine
Watch: AP & Patek
Posts: 462
|
YES! Blue RO doesn't do much for me but the blue chrono with he gold sub dials is a very nice.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.