ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

rickdoss · 12 January 2020, 06:17 AM

I have a 14270 “Swiss” only dial and absolutely love it. It gets a lot of wrist time and it’s a strap monster. Here it with an Everest band.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

rickdoss · 12 January 2020, 06:20 AM

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pauln · 12 January 2020, 07:33 AM

I had the 39mm. But just too much empty space on the dial. And a big flat bezel. I traded for a 114270. Much happier with it. It’s a stunner, really. Everything in perfect proportion.

Dr. Robert · 12 January 2020, 07:37 AM

I have both 114270 & 214270, I am a big fan of both!

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Doc Savage · 12 January 2020, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pauln

I had the 39mm. But just too much empty space on the dial. And a big flat bezel. I traded for a 114270. Much happier with it. It’s a stunner, really. Everything in perfect proportion.

It's funny - that empty space on the dial is what attracted me to the 214270. Different strokes...

LeBapt · 12 January 2020, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cerendigit

Get the 39mm it's the perfect size.

Also, don't underestimate the overall build quality improvements that rolex makes over the years. Those are not specified on a spec sheet, but that's the first thing you'll realize when you have an old and a modern Rolex in hand.

The 39mm dosent suit my tiny wrist very well. Compare to the tudor date day 36mm that I already have, I know this is the size that I need. And for me, older is better

LeBapt · 12 January 2020, 04:25 PM

Here is the best deal that I've spotted there.

About $5000 but that shop cannot offer tax free. At least the set is complete if I am not wrong.

junamuan · 12 January 2020, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doc Savage

It's funny - that empty space on the dial is what attracted me to the 214270. Different strokes...

Same here. Clean. Simple. Classic.

Thuilln · 13 January 2020, 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by javier

I sold it because of the size.IMO too small even in my 6.5 inches wrist

Definitely not too small.

12 January 2020, 07:37 AM	#34
Dr. Robert 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 63,634	I have both 114270 & 214270, I am a big fan of both! Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

12 January 2020, 06:17 AM	#31
rickdoss "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: texas Posts: 33	I have a 14270 “Swiss” only dial and absolutely love it. It gets a lot of wrist time and it’s a strap monster. Here it with an Everest band. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 January 2020, 06:20 AM	#32
rickdoss "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: texas Posts: 33	Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

12 January 2020, 07:33 AM	#33
Pauln "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Real Name: Paul Location: Colorado Watch: Explorer Posts: 1,543	I had the 39mm. But just too much empty space on the dial. And a big flat bezel. I traded for a 114270. Much happier with it. It’s a stunner, really. Everything in perfect proportion.

12 January 2020, 04:25 PM	#37
LeBapt 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Hong Kong Posts: 90	Here is the best deal that I've spotted there. About $5000 but that shop cannot offer tax free. At least the set is complete if I am not wrong.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)