|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 October 2021, 01:59 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 3,018
|
Teddy Reviews Explorer 36mm vs. 39mm
|
|
|
|
10 October 2021, 03:45 AM
|
#2 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,231
|
Nice review and images, thanks for sharing.
For me, the size of the 39's case and clasp + matte dial + balance of text on dial + more open/airy dial is the one. But, I can see the historic appeal of the 36 plus the appeal for smaller wrists. |
|
|
|
23 October 2021, 01:46 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Real Name: 3rd Coast
Location: sarasota
Posts: 59
|
Teddy has great content
|
|
|
|
|
12 November 2021, 03:13 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: New York
Posts: 11
|
I liked the review, the 39mm looks more masculine not because of the size!
|
|
|
|
|
12 November 2021, 05:58 AM
|
#5 | |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Thomas
Location: YVR
Watch: 116233/79190
Posts: 50,197
|
Quote:
__________________
.  ..- ' A Crown for every achievement '
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2021, 06:27 PM
|
#6 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: El Cerrito, CA
Posts: 2,234
|
I want to add that if they did a TT version of the Explorer but left it at 39mm, I think it wouldn't work. I think the TT version is right at 36mm, but I also feel like the SS version is perhaps a bit too stealth. It could use a little something, what exactly I don't know.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
