ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

doramas · 13 October 2016, 02:36 AM

Planet Ocean 2201.50.00 Coaxial 2500 de 42mm vs Seamaster 2254.

what better maintain the value in the future?

Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk

sensui · 13 October 2016, 02:50 AM

Have no clue which will hold more value......But I'd still pick the 2254 between these 2. If it was the Liquid Metal LE....I'd sing a different tune.

Billyp7718 · 13 October 2016, 03:09 AM

My guess is the PO will hold value better especially being the first gen. I personally feel the 2254, though a wonderful piece, has a very 90s style to it that I can't get past. I've had both of these watches and feel the PO's more simplistic design and size options will stand the test of time no matter what the current watch size fads are.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

RW16610 · 13 October 2016, 05:51 AM

That's difficult to answer because both are very popular models. Only time will tell but the Planet Ocean is a first generation and people seem to really like that watch. It'll be close but at least you have both of them!

mato123 · 13 October 2016, 09:56 PM

Both are great watches, but I vote for PO. As mentioned above it's first generation PO and has simpler cleaner design with pretty unique hands.

GolfGuy · 13 October 2016, 11:45 PM

My vote is PO as well... esp since its the 2500 as oppose to the bulkier 8500...

Quicksilver · 14 October 2016, 01:01 AM

Tough as the hey are both nice watches and both already highly collectible . Although I personally prefer the Seamaster I think the PO has an edge in the collectibility stakes as it's a first gen with a cleaner design than later models.

doramas · 16 October 2016, 11:33 PM

Thanks

Maxtor · 17 October 2016, 08:14 AM

I own a 2254 and I am very happy with it.

But the PO is a great watch. Either way it is a win.

The Libertine · 31 October 2016, 06:26 AM

First generation PO.

JP(Canada) · 31 October 2016, 07:02 AM

The 2254 is already outperforming the PO in terms of value. They're costing more now than they did when they were new.

slorollin · 31 October 2016, 08:10 AM

2254

JeremyS · 31 October 2016, 01:09 PM

The 2254. It's a bit more unique. Also, the 1120 a tractor of a movement. The PO is a bit like the early generation Aqua Terra. Omega still makes almost the exact same-looking watch. Conversely, the 2254 in terms of the dial, and the bracelet, is different from the current incarnation of the SMP. Value aside, I would much rather wear the 2254 as well. It's a svelte, well-made 300M sports watch with a tried-and-true movement.

Chewbacca · 31 October 2016, 01:46 PM

2254 all day long.

i've owned both those watches along with about 9 different SMP's and PO's.

i always go back to the "Bond" era SMP... even the quartz versions satisfied me.

Bobby T · 1 November 2016, 02:22 AM

The PO is one of the great dive watches ever..........had the 2500 on the Shark Cage Mesh bracelet........my son has it now. The 2254 always reminded me of a Seiko diver.......

WJGESQ · 2 November 2016, 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doramas

Planet Ocean 2201.50.00 Coaxial 2500 de 42mm vs Seamaster 2254.

what better maintain the value in the future?

Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk

PO is a huge cut above.

JP Chestnut · 2 November 2016, 09:39 AM

Both good choices. I think it would be something like:
PO2500D >= 2254 >>PO2500C

donut · 9 November 2016, 10:46 PM

No one knows the future, but my vote is PO 1st Gen.

bondmag · 12 October 2023, 08:13 PM

Reviving this old thread.
The 2254 prices have rocketed in recent years so I am picking that. I also own one. Fabulous watch but confess I have mixed feelings. It runs very well, is superb under the sea and the dial is a work of art, but the Speedy style bracelet doesn't work for me. Never has. I have been ruined by jangly oyster bracelets and still believe the simple 114270 Explorer is the best watch for me. That being said, picking up a great 2254 is something I highly recommend.

Onequik135i · 13 October 2023, 08:47 PM

After owning both that’s a tough decision, I would imagine the 2500D would hold a little better but I haven’t checked recent values on either yet. These are the 2 references I usually recommend when someone asks fir my opinion on a nice first sports watch to purchase.

Cassidyanne · 14 October 2023, 12:04 AM

Planet Ocean is Omega at its best. Seamaster always reminded me of some of those cheap Seikos. It’s really quite unattractive.

AEC · 14 October 2023, 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassidyanne

...Seamaster always reminded me of some of those cheap Seikos. It’s really quite unattractive.

... she said with impolite disregard for the offense to forum members who own and enjoy a Seamaster Pro.

anodyne13 · 14 October 2023, 12:58 PM

You’re probably talking a few hundred dollars in difference. They are very different looking watches just get the one that sings to you more.

fskywalker · 15 October 2023, 10:50 PM

Have owned both (2254 and 2500D PO) over the years, currently own the 2230 which is the Non AC dial version of the 2254 with 18K bezel and raised markers on the dial. Prefer 2254 series over PO as they are slimmer; caliber 1120 is a workhorse !

Also own a Bond GMT which has the caliber 2628D coaxial movement :

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

13 October 2016, 02:36 AM	#1
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	Planet Ocean Coaxial 2500 vs Seamaster 2254 Planet Ocean 2201.50.00 Coaxial 2500 de 42mm vs Seamaster 2254. what better maintain the value in the future? Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk

14 October 2016, 01:01 AM	#7
Quicksilver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: David Location: London+Guangzhou Watch: ing watches Posts: 2,603	Tough as the hey are both nice watches and both already highly collectible . Although I personally prefer the Seamaster I think the PO has an edge in the collectibility stakes as it's a first gen with a cleaner design than later models. __________________ Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.

31 October 2016, 07:02 AM	#11
JP(Canada) "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Calgary, AB, CAN Posts: 795	The 2254 is already outperforming the PO in terms of value. They're costing more now than they did when they were new. __________________ JP

31 October 2016, 08:10 AM	#12
slorollin "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2016 Location: NC Watch: yer pints & quarts Posts: 372	2254 __________________ "The great Confucius said that he would rather be a profound political economist than chief of police." S. Clemens

13 October 2023, 08:47 PM	#20
Onequik135i "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Tampa, Florida Watch: 116610LV Posts: 2,563	After owning both that’s a tough decision, I would imagine the 2500D would hold a little better but I haven’t checked recent values on either yet. These are the 2 references I usually recommend when someone asks fir my opinion on a nice first sports watch to purchase. __________________ 16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170

13 October 2016, 02:50 AM	#2
sensui 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 12,436	Have no clue which will hold more value......But I'd still pick the 2254 between these 2. If it was the Liquid Metal LE....I'd sing a different tune.

13 October 2016, 03:09 AM	#3
Billyp7718 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: South Jersey Posts: 20	My guess is the PO will hold value better especially being the first gen. I personally feel the 2254, though a wonderful piece, has a very 90s style to it that I can't get past. I've had both of these watches and feel the PO's more simplistic design and size options will stand the test of time no matter what the current watch size fads are. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

13 October 2016, 05:51 AM	#4
RW16610 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Rommel Location: Toronto Canada Watch: 116710LN Posts: 9,178	That's difficult to answer because both are very popular models. Only time will tell but the Planet Ocean is a first generation and people seem to really like that watch. It'll be close but at least you have both of them!

13 October 2016, 09:56 PM	#5
mato123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Current Life Watch: Omega, IWC Posts: 95	Both are great watches, but I vote for PO. As mentioned above it's first generation PO and has simpler cleaner design with pretty unique hands.

13 October 2016, 11:45 PM	#6
GolfGuy "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 230	My vote is PO as well... esp since its the 2500 as oppose to the bulkier 8500...

16 October 2016, 11:33 PM	#8
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	Thanks

17 October 2016, 08:14 AM	#9
Maxtor 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Max Location: Toronto Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo Posts: 2,468	I own a 2254 and I am very happy with it. But the PO is a great watch. Either way it is a win.

31 October 2016, 06:26 AM	#10
The Libertine Banned Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Mike Location: BOS Watch: 16710;14060;214270 Posts: 6,375	First generation PO.

31 October 2016, 01:09 PM	#13
JeremyS "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Norfolk, VA Posts: 273	The 2254. It's a bit more unique. Also, the 1120 a tractor of a movement. The PO is a bit like the early generation Aqua Terra. Omega still makes almost the exact same-looking watch. Conversely, the 2254 in terms of the dial, and the bracelet, is different from the current incarnation of the SMP. Value aside, I would much rather wear the 2254 as well. It's a svelte, well-made 300M sports watch with a tried-and-true movement.

31 October 2016, 01:46 PM	#14
Chewbacca Banned Join Date: May 2012 Real Name: CJ Location: Kashyyyk Watch: Kessel Run Chrono Posts: 21,112	2254 all day long. i've owned both those watches along with about 9 different SMP's and PO's. i always go back to the "Bond" era SMP... even the quartz versions satisfied me.

1 November 2016, 02:22 AM	#15
Bobby T Banned Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: SoCal Posts: 934	The PO is one of the great dive watches ever..........had the 2500 on the Shark Cage Mesh bracelet........my son has it now. The 2254 always reminded me of a Seiko diver.......

2 November 2016, 09:39 AM	#17
JP Chestnut Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: Ann Arbor MI Watch: Rolex Ref 16600 Posts: 3,908	Both good choices. I think it would be something like: PO2500D >= 2254 >>PO2500C

9 November 2016, 10:46 PM	#18
donut "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Jerry Location: Unseen Thailand Watch: LN/LV/BLNR Posts: 543	No one knows the future, but my vote is PO 1st Gen.

12 October 2023, 08:13 PM	#19
bondmag "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2020 Real Name: don Location: Europe Watch: rolex explorer Posts: 7	Reviving this old thread. The 2254 prices have rocketed in recent years so I am picking that. I also own one. Fabulous watch but confess I have mixed feelings. It runs very well, is superb under the sea and the dial is a work of art, but the Speedy style bracelet doesn't work for me. Never has. I have been ruined by jangly oyster bracelets and still believe the simple 114270 Explorer is the best watch for me. That being said, picking up a great 2254 is something I highly recommend.

14 October 2023, 12:04 AM	#21
Cassidyanne Banned Join Date: Nov 2022 Location: Camarillo Posts: 361	Planet Ocean is Omega at its best. Seamaster always reminded me of some of those cheap Seikos. It’s really quite unattractive.

14 October 2023, 12:58 PM	#23
anodyne13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: USA Posts: 111	You’re probably talking a few hundred dollars in difference. They are very different looking watches just get the one that sings to you more.

15 October 2023, 10:50 PM	#24
fskywalker 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Francisco Location: San Juan, PR Watch: Is Ticking ! Posts: 25,148	Planet Ocean Coaxial 2500 vs Seamaster 2254 Have owned both (2254 and 2500D PO) over the years, currently own the 2230 which is the Non AC dial version of the 2254 with 18K bezel and raised markers on the dial. Prefer 2254 series over PO as they are slimmer; caliber 1120 is a workhorse ! Also own a Bond GMT which has the caliber 2628D coaxial movement : Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro __________________ Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)