ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 May 2021, 10:58 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
|
16 May 2021, 11:10 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Bangkok
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
Just answered to ur thread. 124g for 124270 and 107g for 114270 Source from different guys and not sure how many links though. 124270 is heavier and I can definitely can feel that but mostly are from the bracelet. Not as comfortable as 114270 with older style bracelet but you get a a feeling of modern Oyster bracelet instead. Both are unique in it own. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Explorer : 114270 & 124270 GMT Master II : 16710 Jubilee & Oyster Bracelet BlackBay58 : 925 Silver Bullet Royal Oak : 34mm 77350st Nautilus : 7118/1a Blue dial |
|
17 May 2021, 05:49 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: East Coast
Watch: 124270
Posts: 979
|
117g for the 124270 w 1 link removed.
120g with all links. ;) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
ROLEX: 16234-Datejust / 16570-Explorer 2 / 116610LN-Submariner / 124270-Explorer 1 / 126710BLNR-GMT-Master 2 TUDOR: M79030-B Black Bay 58 |
17 May 2021, 05:54 AM | #34 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,047
|
Some measurements of 124270 Explorer
Quote:
We need a third scale to see whether it is 120 or 124g with full links! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
|
17 May 2021, 11:40 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
|
17 May 2021, 04:43 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: UK
Watch: 126622
Posts: 917
|
Thanks for doing this
__________________
♛126622 Rhodium // ♛126234 Blue //♛126613LB // ♛126000 Green + more ♛ 76213 Prince Date+Day // Black Bay 58 // Black Bay Harrods // Heritage Advisor // Vertex M100 + more... |
17 May 2021, 05:22 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: World
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 855
|
Wow, thank you for the great pictures and doing this. Lug to lug at 43mm, which is slightly shorter than 114270's 44mm, correct?
Are other aspects in line to say this is slightly smaller than the 114270 generation? |
17 May 2021, 09:09 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Brian
Location: East Coast
Watch: 124270
Posts: 979
|
Quote:
43.1 but it wears much larger if you include the solid end links. I don’t have a 114270 to know those dimensions. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
ROLEX: 16234-Datejust / 16570-Explorer 2 / 116610LN-Submariner / 124270-Explorer 1 / 126710BLNR-GMT-Master 2 TUDOR: M79030-B Black Bay 58 |
|
18 May 2021, 05:02 AM | #39 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Dan
Location: CT, by a lake
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,544
|
Bookmarking this thread - thank you, faz!
__________________
A watch is about the entire package, not just its appearance. Any large watch company not making its own movement is not making a watch at all; they’re just playing dress-up. --The Watch Snob |
18 May 2021, 07:13 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,340
|
Thank you for this... looks like it's a genuine 36mm (and bit) vs what I thought I read was 35mm and change. This is good!
|
19 May 2021, 10:38 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
|
I just measured my 114270 and got 44mm lug to lug and 45mm SEL to SEL.
|
20 May 2021, 12:35 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: New York
Posts: 88
|
Thanks.
I wonder how this compares to the 37mm Yachtmaster oyster bracelet. I think that may be slightly smaller still, perhaps 17mm or 18mm at the lugs. I hope to see a 37mm Yachtmaster with a slightly larger bracelet closer to this size. |
20 May 2021, 01:33 AM | #43 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Wouldn't surprise me if the YM37 is narrower. Even though it's 1mm larger than DJ/OP/Exp 36, this one is specifically marketed towards women (based on Rolex.com watch finder).
|
20 May 2021, 01:41 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 175
|
Very nice and understated. This won’t be the watch for those trying to flex with a big, chunky, brightly colored, and overpriced trophy.
|
20 May 2021, 03:09 AM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
I partially agree. Smaller watches, IMO, tend to make the wearer look larger, particularly in photos. With oversized pieces, it always looks like the watch is wearing the wearer instead of the other way around. In fact I think this may have something to do with larger, looser fitting watches becoming popular with women.
|
20 May 2021, 03:10 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Up Up North
Posts: 615
|
Nice
|
22 February 2024, 02:22 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Brazil
Posts: 215
|
36 is the one, super classy.
|
22 February 2024, 06:39 PM | #48 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 627
|
Great info!! Thanks for your time and effort.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.