![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 132
|
Feedback on Day Date 1803
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Hobart
Posts: 1,015
|
__________________
2 FA Enabled |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,671
|
.
Font looks good.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,881
|
The case engravings back in the day could often be a little rough. I’ve seen worse sloppiness.
What’s unusual is the non-lume dial with lumed hands. Perhaps something got switched, or maybe not. Worth investigating. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,184
|
The numbers look fine. The engravings were made with a pantograph which is why they aren't very sharp or perfect.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,184
|
All looks good
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,357
|
Fine for me. I've seen some dreadful pantograph engravings that I believe were original/authentic.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.