ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 August 2024, 02:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Ben
Location: Utah
Watch: Sub date
Posts: 157
|
Opinions on 3185 vs 3186
Folks, one of the watches I am considering for my next Rolex is the Polar Explorer 2. It would have to be the 40mm (I don't like any version of the 42), but I am not specific on whether it needs to have the 3186 movement vs the 3185. I kind of like the idea of occasionally changing out the bracelet for a leather strap, and lug holes would make this easier, but are not mandatory. Solid end links and super luminova are mandatory.
My question is should I avoid the 3185 movement, or is it a solid and dependable movement that will be serviceable for the next several decades? Thank you |
7 August 2024, 02:55 AM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Carlos.
Location: NNJ - MDE
Watch: = Want them all.
Posts: 3,641
|
The 3185 is as solid and as dependable as the 3186.
I personally would not pay the premium for a 3186.... if prices were the same, I'd go for newer (Because I'm a fan of rehaut engravings) aside from that... I'll take the 3185 and put the $700 ish or so towards a delicious steak dinner.
__________________
| Breguet | Cartier | Casio | Hublot | Omega | Oris | Rolex | Seiko | |
7 August 2024, 03:21 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 52,936
|
Speaking for myself would take the cal 3185 over the 3186 and would not pay extra for the 3186.The 3186 had a few problems which the 3185 never had but was rectified by Rolex but still would always prefer the 3185.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
7 August 2024, 03:27 AM | #4 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,834
|
What Padi said. However, I’ve always considered the 3186 v. 3185 issue of rarity a pretty silly pursuit. They’re so similar it’s not worth a premium.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
7 August 2024, 03:31 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 572
|
Quote:
Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t the 3185 power 95% of GMT‘s from that pre-ceramic generation? If it is indeed unreliable, then I need to sell mine posthaste. You guys are on a roll today. . Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
7 August 2024, 03:35 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Uk
Watch: RolexGMT/Tudor7928
Posts: 3,989
|
|
7 August 2024, 05:41 AM | #7 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Ron
Location: Detroitish
Watch: GMT II/Sub/Exp II
Posts: 2,503
|
First priority for me would be overall condition of the watch. What you see on your wrist trumps the guts by a mile. I have a couple of each (3185/6) and don't notice any difference other than the 24 hr hand wiggle. Enjoy the hunt!
|
7 August 2024, 05:51 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: Australia
Posts: 188
|
I’ve owned my explorer II for 18 years, most of the time it was my daily. Only serviced once. It has the 3185 movement. Never had a single issue. Didn’t even notice the gmt hand wiggle until I joined this forum! I recently acquired a later model 16710 also with the 3185 movement. The secondary market premium for the later 3186 movement was not a step I was willing to take.
|
7 August 2024, 06:03 AM | #9 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SUBMARINER Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,445
|
Quote:
It is the later 3186 that has had the problems and have had to have the bugs worked out. I expect that it is the earlier 16570 Exp II's that would have had the problematic first generation of 3186's so you would want to know if it has had the fixes incorporated. The newer Ceramic Exp II's use the 3187 movement.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
7 August 2024, 10:30 AM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Neo-Vintage
Posts: 1,211
|
As others have stated, there is no reason to avoid the 3185 movement. It’s likely more robust than the 3186.
However, if you are looking at 16750 Polar Explorer IIs, late versions (those with a 3186, but not all 3186s) have what is called a “thin frame dial” where the black surrounds are noticeably thinner around the circular lume plots. This is an aesthetic preference, so it is up to the individual — but these do tend to carry a cost premium. As many others have said, I tend to look at overall condition first, as that is more important than the small nuances to me. |
7 August 2024, 10:54 AM | #11 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: Brian
Location: Nashville
Watch: 16750
Posts: 6,502
|
Just go 3185.
I own a 3186 variant that I recently acquired. Truth be told having recently been looking at this and having the same debate I would look for a 2000-2003 era variant. Sort of the best of all worlds, yet no premium that the seller look for in a 3186. That was my original plan, but was offered a 3186 variant locally for a good deal so just went for it.
__________________
16750 | 6516(wife’s) | 126334 | 16570 | SBGA413 | SRPE33 | 126610LV |
7 August 2024, 11:29 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: FL
Posts: 183
|
Find a nice P serial watch. 3185, lug holes, SEL.
|
7 August 2024, 03:23 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: EARTH
Watch: What is "watch"?
Posts: 1,238
|
3185 > 3186 in the 5 digit era for the above mentioned “problems”
__________________
“UNpolished or I’m not interested” 😎 2FA Enabled |
7 August 2024, 03:34 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: down the drain
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,100
|
No brainer for me, 3186 with the RRR rehaut.
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
8 August 2024, 03:08 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Stephen
Location: Beach
Watch: 16660
Posts: 9,356
|
Opinions on 3185 vs 3186
Quote:
I ended up getting the 3186, engraved rehaut, and thin surrounds. I bought it NOS relatively recently. I needed to correct one of my few watch regrets — I sold the 16570 Polar I bought new from an AD back in circa 2001. While I regret selling my original one, I am thrilled with the one I have now - it’s one of my favorites. OP, I suggest finding one in top condition within the price range you are comfortable with. Then wear and enjoy it!
__________________
"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." --- RWE |
|
9 August 2024, 09:26 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Real Name: Ben
Location: Utah
Watch: Sub date
Posts: 157
|
Thank you all for your input.
Back in 2016 I had the chance to try on a 2002 Y serial number polar dial that was for sell at the local used Rolex dealer (where I had just purchased my first Sub). I was surprised at how much I liked it, but was low on funds (ie, just purchased a Sub). I've always kicked myself for not just using the credit card, as it was in excellent shape, box and papers, and the price was $3900. I've always liked the idea of putting this watch on a brown leather strap, and using it as a travel / field watch. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.