![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 664
|
5212 vs 5205G-010
Gents I’m looking to add another Patek to the collection. I have a blue 5172 and several other nice watches. No moonphase and, obviously, no weekly calendar. So price being fairly equal used which of these do you prefer and why?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Socal
Watch: AP/PP/Rolex
Posts: 1,990
|
I have both the 5205g 013 and the 5212a. If I had to choose, it would be the 5212. It looks good with just about any strap, which makes it very versatile.
__________________
PP 5205G-013/ PP 5212A / AP 15416CE /26574 st QP/ AP 50th 16202st /AP 15500st Black / AP 26405CE / AP 77350CE / AP 15551st / AP 67540sk / Rolex 116500 Panda / Rolex 126710 BLRO / Rolex 126610LV Green / Rolex 16570 Black/ Rolex 116300 Blue / Rolex 126710 BLNR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 19
|
5205G/R or 5212a for me are 2 super nice watches 5212a for sure more versatile and under the radar.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: England
Posts: 928
|
One is an annual calendar in precious metal, the other is not. But I’m biased, the 5205 is my only Patek and I love it.
__________________
The collection is never complete |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,894
|
The 5205 would easily win this one for me.
Neither is the wrong choice but for me I'm a huge fan of Patek AC, especially the triple aperture display. Couple this with the scalloped case and skeletonised lugs, in PM, it's an easy winner. Both are gambles by patek to move the brand into new design territories. Good luck with your choice. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,703
|
5205 easy, the 5212 looks clutter to me , matter of taste . But legibility on the 5212 is a problem for me (my eyesight is not as it’s used to be , lol) , but it’s a unique watch I have to say that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing happens until something moves " Albert Einstein |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,375
|
I find the 5205 dial design quite poor just like most Patek AC dial designs. Also don't like hollow lugs. So not for me at all. Not a big fan of 5212 either TBH. Very busy for a complication I have no use for. I'd look elsewhere altogether.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: US
Posts: 680
|
5212 for sure - very unique watch!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 664
|
Thanks all - I'm leaning 5212 simply because it's so unique and quirky. And I already have a PC so the AC may feel a bit superfluous. Keep the input coming though - a decision will be made soon!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
![]() Last week I got my 5205G-0010 and I absolutely love it. Let us know what you decide. You can’t go wrong with those choices! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 664
|
Thanks your 5205 looks great. I’ve settled on the 5212 and I have one incoming soon. Thanks for all the feedback here!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: UK
Posts: 16
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: USA
Posts: 159
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.